1. Dear Drugs-Forum readers: We are a small non-profit that runs one of the most read drug information & addiction help websites in the world. We serve over 4 million readers per month, and have costs like all popular websites: servers, hosting, licenses and software. To protect our independence we do not run ads. We take no government funds. We run on donations which average $25. If everyone reading this would donate $5 then this fund raiser would be done in an hour. If Drugs-Forum is useful to you, take one minute to keep it online another year by donating whatever you can today. Donations are currently not sufficient to pay our bills and keep the site up. Your help is most welcome. Thank you.
    PLEASE HELP
    Dismiss Notice

About Organic Chemistry 1.0

By Docta, Oct 24, 2011 | | |
Rating:
4/5,
  1. Docta
    Introduction

    A common question in the basic chemistry forum is, “where can I learn about organic chemistry”.

    It was not easy coming from high school level general chemistry into organic chemistry, for many the most feared of all the experimental sciences. The strangest thing about the subject is that after studying it informally for around 7 years I really thought I understood it reasonably well until the day I started thinking like a chemist, that was when I realised I hardly comprehended the basics.

    Thinking like a chemist is the point when you suddenly no longer see the chemistry as letters, symbols or raw data but actual 3D physical parts of the world around us. It’s the observation of the world around us that gave us organic chemistry.

    The recognition of elementary composition and physical properties is fundamental to understanding chemical behaviour so here I am going to make an attempt to explain these fundamentals and behaviours starting with some background history.


    In the beginning

    The sixteenth and seventeenth century’s ushered in a new age of scientific thinking that washed away the mysticism and alchemy of the past, except for the belief that an “organic” substance derived from an organism was endowed with some kind of vital force of nature that a substance derived from an inanimate object was not.
    Such is the relationship of the word organic to the word chemistry.
    This belief that organically derived had superior quality’s to the synthetically derived was a great impatience to the evolution of organic chemistry.

    Although this “vital force of nature” was debunked by Wohler in 1882 when he synthesised urea by heating the “inorganic” compound ammonium cyanate, some people still believe in vitalism to this day but fortunately they no longer have any power over the sciences.

    The analytical scientific method

    The invention of quantitative analysis of organic compounds by combustion evolved quickly into an accurate method of ascertaining the hydrogen, carbon and nitrogen composition of compounds.
    This intern gave rise to the discovery and synthesis of thousands of new compounds.
    It was the successful commercialisation of discovery and synthesis that drove rapid dissemination of the new analytical method in organic chemistry. This great expansion of the analytical scientific method sparked the industrial revolution and the modern era.

    Breakthrough, The theory of structure

    One small word for Berzelius, one giant leap for man kind…… “Isomerism”

    TO BE CONTINUED….

    Share This Article

Comments

To make a comment simply sign up and become a member!
  1. C.D.rose
    Posted 24-10-2011 at 04:20... *giggle*

    Seriously though, if you're going to write more stuff about chemistry or the history of chemistry, I'd love that... it's (probably) a very interesting subject that I know very little about... so, yeah, looking forward to that :D...