1. Dear Drugs-Forum readers: We are a small non-profit that runs one of the most read drug information & addiction help websites in the world. We serve over 4 million readers per month, and have costs like all popular websites: servers, hosting, licenses and software. To protect our independence we do not run ads. We take no government funds. We run on donations which average $25. If everyone reading this would donate $5 then this fund raiser would be done in an hour. If Drugs-Forum is useful to you, take one minute to keep it online another year by donating whatever you can today. Donations are currently not sufficient to pay our bills and keep the site up. Your help is most welcome. Thank you.
    PLEASE HELP
  1. 5-HT2A
    It is no secret that opioids are addictive even when used as prescribed. That is why they were highly restricted until fairly recently. It is also no secret that there is no evidence of the long-term usefulness of opioids in chronic pain despite unethical Pharma marketing.

    Now Pfizer, the second biggest drug company in the world, has agreed to add warnings to the dangerous drugs that cause as many as 60 deaths a day in the U.S. Pfizer will disclose that opioids “carry serious risk of addiction—even when used properly,” says the Washington Post, and promises “not to promote opioids for unapproved, ‘off-label’ uses such as long-term back pain. The company also will acknowledge there is no good research on opioids’ effectiveness beyond 12 weeks.”

    The disclosures and warnings Pfizer has pledged are not a mea culpa. The city of Chicago sued five opioid makers in 2013—Johnson & Johnson, Purdue Pharma, Teva Pharmaceutical Industries, Endo Health, and Actavis—but Pfizer was not one of them. Pfizer, which sells one opioid painkiller, was not named in the lawsuit, and there’s no admission of wrongdoing.

    Instead, Pfizer is voluntarily drafting an opioid marketing code, a spokesperson told FiercePharma, because Pfizer considers opioid misuse a “public health issue” and is “happy to stand alongside them [Chicago] to ensure that painkillers are marketed responsibly. We want to make sure that the right people who need it have it.” The code reflects Pfizer’s current marketing policies, said the spokesperson, and follows FDA risk-management programs for extended-release and long-acting opioids.

    Pfizer makes and markets the extended-release opioid painkiller, Embeda, which is not as central to the opioid addiction epidemic as Purdue’s long-acting opioid OxyContin.

    Chicago’s lawsuit and similar suits brought by Santa Clara and Orange County charge the companies with a two-decade conspiracy to profiteer on opiate sales. In addition to disseminating misleading medical information that downplayed addiction and lied about the long-term effectiveness of opioids, the municipalities charge the opioid makers with creating faux “patient” groups that scream “more opioids” and buying the opinions of respected doctors. Chicago health plans spent millions of dollars on opioids, reported Crain’s Chicago, which the city says were inappropriately prescribed to city employees.

    Few if any studies show that workers kept on opioids return to work more quickly, and much of the medical literature points to the opposite. Workers who remained on opioids for more than seven days during the first six weeks after an injury were more than twice as likely to be disabled and out of work a year later, according to a study in the journal Spine. In another study in Spine, workers who received early opioid drugs in morphine equivalent amounts of more than 450 mg “were, on average, disabled 69 days longer than those who received no early opioids” and their “risk for surgery was three times greater.” The study concludes that “Given the negative association between receipt of early opioids for acute LBP [lower back pain] and outcomes, it is suggested that the use of opioids for the management of acute LBP may be counterproductive to recovery.”

    Workers who received high opioid doses actually stayed out of work three times longer in a California study and experienced “delayed recovery from work-place injuries,” say other data.

    Ineffective for Chronic Pain

    As AlterNet recently reported, Pharma churned the chronic pain market to sell opioids despite their ineffectiveness. “Despite more than a decade of booming use of narcotic painkillers for chronic pain conditions, solid evidence of the long-term safety and effectiveness of the drugs is scant to nonexistent,” reported John Fauber of the Journal Sentinel.

    After a decade of Pharma promising doctors and patients that opioids are good and necessary for chronic pain, two government-sponsored research papers published in the Annals of Internal Medicine in 2015 revealed that there have been only short-term studies of opioid pain relief and almost no data support their long-term use.

    As Pfizer will now concede, there is “no good research on opioids’ effectiveness beyond 12 weeks.” And that is not all. Opioids can actually make pain worse, says Richard W. Rosenquist, of the Cleveland Clinic; a phenomenon called opioid-induced hyperalgesia or OIA.

    “I have personally treated patients who were terrified to titrate off opioids because they were afraid of returning pain, only to find they were in less pain once off the opioids,” writes Sridhar Vasudevan, in Multidisciplinary Management of Chronic Pain, which offers many non-surgical, non-opioid treatments for chronic pain.

    Many chronic pain patients without terminal or malignant pain have drunk the Kool-Aid. The real problem is the media’s “misunderstanding” of opioids and chronic pain, much to the pleasure of Big Pharma. They do not remember that 20 years ago, before Pharma marketing, it would have been unheard of to treat chronic pain with narcotics.

    Opioid casualties are not just young people who turned to heroin after they could not get opioids. Elderly patients have especially been hurt by the opioid craze. “Older brains and bodies are prone to drug complications, from falls and respiratory failure to cognitive problems and dementia,” and “because older bodies metabolize drugs less quickly, those medications tend to build up in their bodies” said a 2014 expose in USA Today.

    Pfizer is right and could be commended for admitting that opioids are addictive as prescribed and that they do not work after a few weeks. However, this was known about opioids during the entire 20-year opioid addiction epidemic.

    by Martha Rosenberg

    July 8, 2016

    Source:
    http://www.alternet.org/drugs/pfizer-ads-warnings-opioids

Comments

  1. Beenthere2Hippie
    Re: After 20 Years And Many Billions, Pfizer Finally Admits That Opioids Are Addictiv

    Nice news catch, and kind of what we who live on opiates or "oiods" always knew was truth. Millions (perhaps billions) of people worldwide can't all be wrong.
  2. MrsRamirez
    Re: After 20 Years And Many Billions, Pfizer Finally Admits That Opioids Are Addictiv

    I took them as prescribed until both me and my husband were taking them at the same time and he took his at the time he was supposed to which happened to be right before bed and it made him open up and talk to me I had just taken mine 2 hours earlier so I went ahead and took them again and when I started feeling them kick in we ended up talking all night.... that's how it started with nightly heart to heart long talks then when the last couple of days before next prescription we had nothing to talk about until our refills and we were taking more than prescribed to feel them like the first night and taking another dose about 2 to 3 hours later to continue our new nightly routine... after 6 months total from the first prescription I knew there was a problem... it only got worse over the next 4 years.
  3. Calliope
    Re: After 20 Years And Many Billions, Pfizer Finally Admits That Opioids Are Addictiv

    It does annoy me that this story itself expresses in a less than fully careful way what is and isnt known about opiate/oid painkillers and their effectiveness and risks.

    What I mean is that a lack of evidence of longterm effectiveness and safety IS NOT evidence of longterm ineffectiveness and unacceptable risk. Yet the story seems to slip into at least implying it is:

    Few if any studies show that workers kept on opioids return to work more quickly, and much of the medical literature points to the opposite. Workers who remained on opioids for more than seven days during the first six weeks after an injury were more than twice as likely to be disabled and out of work a year later, according to a study in the journal Spine. In another study in Spine, workers who received early opioid drugs in morphine equivalent amounts of more than 450 mg “were, on average, disabled 69 days longer than those who received no early opioids” and their “risk for surgery was three times greater.” The study concludes that “Given the negative association between receipt of early opioids for acute LBP [lower back pain] and outcomes, it is suggested that the use of opioids for the management of acute LBP may be counterproductive to recovery.”​

    Unless these studies control for severity and type of injury the inference that use of opioids may be counterproductive is simply unfounded. Patients with more severe injury involving more severe pain and a longer recovery period are patients more likely to remain on opioids longer and also return to work less quickly, no? Not because opioids are not good choices here but because more pain and more severe injury is more debilitating for longer... I hope the studies they refer to controlled for this but if they did it would be really good practice to actually say so in the story.

    It would also be nice to see some facts about the risk of opioid-induced hyperalgesia (the increased sensitivity and experience of pain from use of opioids). How likely is this outcome and at what stage of use of opioids for pain does it become a more serious risk? Simply saying it happens gives the impression it is inevitable. Is it? If not than we should know so we can make choices about the rationality of risking it. Some of us cannot take NSAID pain meds and APAP at the levels required for relief risks serious liver damage. So, knowing these facts is kinda important.

    Finally, this line really pisses me off:
    "Pfizer is right and could be commended for admitting that opioids are addictive as prescribed and that they do not work after a few weeks."​

    Please for the love of beelzebub distinguish dependence and addiction first off. And if you insist on saying 'addictive' then say 'may be addictive'. And exactly when was it shown that opioids do not work after a few weeks? This is bloody sloppy and extremely annoying in the context of a story about the deliberately misleading expression of data and facts around these things by Pharma. Dont do what they do, seriously. Be better.

    And finally, for real this time: Does anyone not see that at heart the biggest problem here is THE VERY IDEA OF MARKETING BY PHARMA?
    ____________________________________

    EDIT: To help rectify what I see as the lack of needed information in the original story (this is a criticism of the original writer, not of 5-HT2A for his good work posting it!) I've uploaded a few recent articles on opioid-induced hyperalgesia:

    Kirsty Bannister (2015) Opioid-induced hyperalgesia: where are we now? (2015) Curr Opin Support Palliat Care 2015, 9:116–121. DOI:10.1097/SPC.0000000000000137. This article says "High-dose opioid therapy is associated with worsening pain sensations in a subset of susceptible patients." Note two things about this - 1. HIGH-DOSE and 2. SUBSET. This indicates to me that opioid-induced pain increases are not happening to ALL patients even amongst those on high doses. Implying they are isn't responsible journalism (and is pretty annoying in an article precisely on misrepresentation of risks and data.)

    Yi P, Pryzbylkowski P. (2015). Opioid Induced Hyperalgesia. Pain Med. 2015 Oct;16 Suppl 1:S32-6. doi: 10.1111/pme.12914. Review. PMID: 26461074

    David A. Fishbain, Brandly Cole, John E. Lewis, Jinrun Gao, and R. Steele Rosomoff. (2009) Do Opioids Induce Hyperalgesia in Humans? An Evidence-Based Structured Review. Pain Medicine Volume 10 • Number 5, 2009.
To make a comment simply sign up and become a member!