1. Dear Drugs-Forum readers: We are a small non-profit that runs one of the most read drug information & addiction help websites in the world. We serve over 4 million readers per month, and have costs like all popular websites: servers, hosting, licenses and software. To protect our independence we do not run ads. We take no government funds. We run on donations which average $25. If everyone reading this would donate $5 then this fund raiser would be done in an hour. If Drugs-Forum is useful to you, take one minute to keep it online another year by donating whatever you can today. Donations are currently not sufficient to pay our bills and keep the site up. Your help is most welcome. Thank you.
    PLEASE HELP
  1. Beenthere2Hippie
    View attachment 45212 ALASKA – Native Alaskan Leif Abel knew how to hunt, fish, trap and grow organically by the time he was eight. In the family greenhouse, marijuana plants grew among the tomatoes, cucumbers and garden flowers.

    “On the Yukon when I was a kid, it was as normal as anything else,” he recalled. “I probably was pretty old before I realized that it was a little bit of a societal taboo.”

    Last November, Alaska legalized recreational marijuana use. The voter initiative passed 53 percent to 47 percent, but it was hardly unforeseen to people like Abel living in the state’s interior. Long ingrained in their culture, Alaskans have been growing and using marijuana in their homes for decades. Nearly 40 years ago, the Alaska Supreme Court ruled that an adult’s right to use and possess a small amount of marijuana at home for personal use was protected under the Alaska Constitution’s right to privacy.

    But now, the state’s unique relationship to cannabis also poses unique challenges to legalization. Alaska has struggled to roll out regulations that please its conservative majority while at the same time staying true to the initiative’s intentions. Just one cannabis-related bill, which created the Marijuana Control Board (MCB), passed in this year’s legislative session.

    “We are struggling,” said Cynthia Franklin, director of the board and former prosecutor. “I’ve tried a death penalty capital murder and this is harder than that.”

    Senate Bill 30, arguably the most important piece of legislation on the table dealing with the legalization of cannabis, never was approved. Without it there are no clear guidelines on what is legal and what is not, leaving law enforcement officers not knowing what to do.

    “The tendency is to not enforce any of the laws,” said Deputy Chief Brad Johnson of the Fairbanks Police Department.

    Many questions remain unanswered. Regulations for the new cannabis market, including laws on licensing and zoning, are unresolved. Gov. Bill Walker (I) named five members to the MCB on July 1. The board has until November to draft and adopt state-wide regulations pertaining to the cultivation, manufacture and sale of cannabis. For now, it’s a time of uncertainty for Alaskans.

    A narrow dirt road leads up to Abel’s house. Until recently the road had no name, just a hand-painted number on a wooden plaque. Abel waited at the top of his two-story house, in a perfectly pressed, spotless navy button-down. He had been up since 5 a.m. feeding the cows, collecting chicken eggs and milking the goats. One of Abel’s earliest memories were of his parents discussing the Alaska Supreme Court’s ruling in Ravin v. Alaska. “It changed everything,” he said, as he stared at a small potted cannabis plant sitting on the kitchen counter.

    In 1972 attorney Irwin Ravin was arrested in Anchorage after being pulled over by police for driving with a broken taillight. At the time Ravin was in possession of cannabis and refused to sign a ticket. He appealed the conviction and within three years took the case all the way to the Alaska Supreme Court. Ravin was familiar with the state’s libertarian mindset and its “stay out of my business” philosophy. So when he set out to change the law he didn’t just focus on cannabis. Instead he decided to base his defense on something Alaskans valued dearly — their right to privacy.

    It paid off. In 1975, the court ruled in his favor, making Alaska the first state to legalize cannabis for in-home, personal use. The decision paved the way to legalize medical cannabis in 1998 and recreational cannabis last year. People 21 and older are allowed to possess up to an ounce of cannabis and grow up to six plants in private. They are also allowed to gift up to one ounce or six immature cannabis plants to others who are 21 and older.

    Abel lives on a large plot of land with his wife and two children, in the Kenai Peninsula. His brother and father are his only neighbors, his house surrounded by tall, green western hemlock trees. Abel is Alaskan-born, unlike the roughly 60 per cent of people living in the state. According to him the state attracts independently minded people. Coupled with a set of laws that defends privacy, that translates into more people growing and consuming cannabis.

    “People come here because they want to be able to do what they want and be left alone,” Abel said. “People want to be allowed to do what they want without being told what to do by the government with cannabis.”

    View attachment 45213 John Collette moved to Fairbanks in 1952, when he was 4. He considered leaving the state many times, but deep down knew Alaska was the only place for him. “There is always a culture shock when you leave,” he said. “In other states people follow the rules and care about what others think. We don’t have that here.”

    Shortly after the Supreme Court ruling in 1975, he began to experiment with cannabis. It started with a few plants in a small field in his property, but things escalated quickly. Inside a greenhouse, Collette and his wife grew tomatoes, cucumbers, roses and cannabis. He operated in the black market, selling no less than half a pound per transaction. In the 16 years he grew and sold cannabis, he never met the customers. There was always a middle man. It was a daily exercise of freedom from government intervention.

    “We had 35,000 acres of legal greenhouses and 300 square feet of illegal marijuana,” said Collette, who is 69, but said he doesn’t feel his age. He dresses in washed jeans and sneakers and carries a flip phone. Thin-rim round glasses rest on his wrinkled nose. Inside, his house is darkly lit, sparsely decorated with model airplanes and old photos of his children.

    However, for over a decade, Collette wasn’t allowed to step into the place he called home. In 1992, his house and business were raided by state and federal authorities, led by the Drug Enforcement Administration. He served eight and a half years of an 11-year sentence for cannabis-related crimes and was released in early 2003. Since then, Collette has stayed out of the cannabis industry, though that may change now that businesses are legal in the state. Collette is now concerned about how the new market might influence the state’s cannabis community and values. He said he would prefer it to be a casual exchange as opposed to a commercial transaction.

    “I am looking for the time where it’s of no consequence,” said Collette. “It never has been a big deal and it shouldn’t be a big deal in the future.”

    Sitting behind a large, cluttered desk on the second floor of the Fairbanks Police Department, Brad Johnson explained why passing Senate Bill 30, dubbed the “marijuana crime bill,” was important for law enforcement. In front of him, a postcard in a small photo frame reads, “Dare to soar.” Johnson is the president of the Alaska Association of Chiefs of Police.

    The ballot initiative has legalized certain aspects of marijuana use and marijuana possession, he says, but existing state statutes haven’t changed. “We have statutory conflict. [Cannabis] remains a controlled substance, by statute. The penalties for possession, use, sale, manufacture as written prior to the ballot initiative remain in effect,” he said.

    In this year’s legislative session, the state had difficulty balancing the concerns of its conservative majority while honoring the will of its voters. House Bill 123, dealing with the creation of the MCB, was the only bill approved in the entire session.

    “It’s very difficult for the line officer right now because they have no clear guidance,” explained Johnson.

    He said officers will rely the Marijuana Control Board for regulatory guidance until the legislature meets next year. But even then, he’s skeptical of what can be achieved without an outright correction of the statutes. It’s unclear whether the legislature will arrange an emergency meeting later in the year.

    The deputy chief is especially worried about regulations for Driving Under the Influence of Drugs (DUID) offenses. Officers are not prepared to detect impaired drivers under the influence of marijuana, he says. There is nothing in Title 28, the statute dealing with motor vehicles, about cannabis intoxication in specific. Without guidelines each arrest will be dealt with on a case by case basis.

    “The next year is going to be very, very challenging.”

    Cynthia Franklin walked about the office with intent, moving reports around before sitting behind her desk to answer the flurries of emails, one “ping” after another. Since taking the job as the director of the Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC) Board last September, it’s been a constant flow of questions, comments and interview requests flooding her inbox. The new law made the ABC Board responsible for adopting and implementing regulations relating to the cultivation, manufacture, and sale of cannabis until the MCB is created.

    When House Bill 123 passed in April, Franklin was appointed director of the MCB. Her new office in downtown Anchorage has a 180-degree view of the city, with the mountains in the backdrop. “There’s a lot of people waiting for me to fail,” she said. “It makes the process more stressful, but also more fun.” On the wall of her office, a large blackboard is covered in color-coded mappings of the rule-making process. At the top of her concerns, Franklin listed the emergence of a gray market. With no legal dispensaries in the state, in spite of its medical marijuana law, Alaska has a long history of an underground cannabis industry.

    When the Alaska Medical Marijuana Initiative passed in 1998, the measure did not create provisions for medical dispensaries. Patients could either grow their own cannabis or appoint a caregiver. Caregivers, in turn, were only allowed to grow for one person other than relatives. The strict regulations and pre-existing Ravin ruling, were the perfect mix for a thriving black market. For example, Angel McCabe has grown cannabis organically for over a decade, selling it illegally to medical marijuana users who could not grow on their own or find a willing caregiver. As a former black market grower she had a lot of things to be scared of — getting robbed, raided or having her children taken away.

    “A lot of us lived in fear for a long time that something would happen to us just for growing cannabis,” she adds. With the new law McCabe is hoping to “make the switch into the light” and transition into the legal market. “We are getting there, slowly but surely.”

    But according to Franklin, Alaska’s lack of medical market, once a problem, could now play to the state’s advantage. Alaska would be the first to regulate the medical and recreational markets at the same time — and that could help diffuse the gray market. Currently there are no provisions for medical sales, which means all marijuana under the new voter initiative would be treated the same way throughout the state. There would be no separate markets or taxes for recreational and medicinal, as is the case in Colorado and Washington.

    “By virtue of that we are going to avoid a lot of the problems the other states have seen with having a regulated market and an unregulated market,” Franklin added.

    The MCB has until November to create and adopt regulations. By February 2016 the MCB would begin accepting business license applications. For people looking to get into the market the evolving process still is confusing. Abel is hopeful nonetheless. Next year he will apply for a marijuana business license. He’s spent the last few months testing marijuana edibles, meeting with lawyers and designing logos for Greatland Ganja, a family-run business he wants to open with his father and brother and one day hopes to pass on to his children.

    “I feel a greater buy-in and a greater respect for my own society as a whole because I’ve been given this public signal that what I am doing is no longer illegal,” he said, pausing for a brief second. “That means a lot to me. I think it means a lot to a lot of people in this state.”

    This story was one in a series on the legalization of marijuana produced in partnership with the 2015 Carnegie-Knight News21 national student reporting project.



    By Emi Sasagawa - News 21/July 16, 2015
    http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs...-now-the-state-is-struggling-to-regulate-it/?
    Newshawk Crew

    Author Bio

    Beenthere2Hippie
    BT2H is a retired news editor and writer from the NYC area who, for health reasons, retired to a southern US state early, and where BT2H continues to write and to post drug-related news to DF.

Comments

  1. PhillipDChillum
    Oregon also is struggling with their new law, and have enacted even more, such as
    Begining oct1, recreational users will be able to buy in medical dispenseries...and medical growers will be able to SELL, not donate, their nuggets to disp for sale to public, and pay taxes on weed..yeeaaahhhh.
    But counties that didnt vote in the majority for measure 91 can vote to not allow recreational stores in their county
  2. TheBigBadWolf
    Interesting to read from the view of a country that has only allowed 300 medical patients to use cannabis of several hundred thousand waiting for the laws to change to finally have their pain treated, not talking about the some millions of recreational users.

    Interesting also what consequences come with liberalising cannabis grow and trade.

    BBW
  3. Beenthere2Hippie
    Interesting how a state can give, then take, then half-assed re-give marijuana freedoms back to its citizenry...only in America.
  4. PhillipDChillum
    Especially when oregons measure 91 specifically stated no changes to medical, then put new provisions limiting growers per parcel(48plants, from 2 growers, w 4 patients each). Used to have 4growers per parcel, 96 total plants
To make a comment simply sign up and become a member!