1. Dear Drugs-Forum readers: We are a small non-profit that runs one of the most read drug information & addiction help websites in the world. We serve over 4 million readers per month, and have costs like all popular websites: servers, hosting, licenses and software. To protect our independence we do not run ads. We take no government funds. We run on donations which average $25. If everyone reading this would donate $5 then this fund raiser would be done in an hour. If Drugs-Forum is useful to you, take one minute to keep it online another year by donating whatever you can today. Donations are currently not sufficient to pay our bills and keep the site up. Your help is most welcome. Thank you.
    PLEASE HELP
  1. Sitbcknchill
    WASHINGTON - A comprehensive anti-methamphetamine bill that enjoyed broad support was put on the shelf until next year when Congress adjourned this week for the holidays.

    The measure was close to final passage but was attached to a controversial anti-terrorism bill, the USA Patriot Act, that was blocked in the final days of the session.

    The anti-meth provision would have placed a 3.6 gram limit - about 120 pills - on daily purchases of cold medicines that contain ephedrine or pseudoephedrine, ingredients that can be used to make meth.

    It would require retailers to sell the medicines, which include Sudafed, NyQuil and Benadryl, behind store counters.

    It also would require companies to report shipments of ephedrine or pseudoephedrine into the United States in an effort to stop ingredients from heading to meth superlabs.

    The legislation would also authorize a "Meth Hot Spots" program to steer additional federal grants to local authorities, increase funding for drug courts and toughen federal penalties against meth traffickers.

    The Patriot Act, a collection of wiretap and search laws initially passed after the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks, was reauthorized in the House but blocked in the Senate.

    Democrats and four Republicans voted to delay the bill saying they were concerned it did not contain sufficient civil liberties protections for innocent Americans who might get caught in its net, or strong enough requirements for investigators to justify their targes.

    Senators compromised to renew the act for six months. But the anti-methamphetamine provisions were dropped in the process.

    Senate leaders late Wednesday promised they would revive the anti-meth bill when Congress returns to session early next year.

    "We will address those very early when we come back in January or February," said Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist, R-Tenn., calling the anti-meth bill an "important issue."

    It was unclear Thursday how the House might choose to proceed.

    Lawmakers will seek a new way to move the bill forward, either as a freestanding measure or attached to another bill, said Jim Kaiser, a counselor for the House Criminal Justice, Drug Policy and Human Resources Subcommittee.

    "We were under the strong presumption that it would pass," Kaiser said.

    Representatives of interest groups following the issue said they were confident the bill would quickly regain momentum.

    "I think that this is a setback, but that it's only going to be temporary," said Joe Dunn, associate legislative director for the National Association of Counties. Most local governments regard methamphetamine abuse as a top problem, Dunn said.

    "I think it's not an issue of if it's going to pass, but when," Dunn said.


    Pubdate: Fri, 23 Dec 2005
    Source: Herald Democrat (TX)
    Copyright: 2005 Herald Democrat

Comments

  1. Sitbcknchill
    THE METH PLAGUE.....


    Behind the times: The main thing I took away from your methamphetamine series "The Perfect Drug" -- especially "Bad Medicine" ( Sarah Fenske, December 8 ( http://www.phoenixnewtimes.com/Issues/2005-12-08/news/feature.html ) ) -- was that the authorities in this state are a bunch of dumb-asses.

    It's just like the kind of fools we elect in Arizona to be so drastically behind the times. That is, to think that putting cold remedies behind the counters is going to solve the meth problem. End of story. Problem solved.

    Aren't these law enforcement experts supposed to know what's going on?! I find it funny that Governor Janet Napolitano, the former state Attorney General of Arizona, thinks she has been on top of the problem all along ( "Methology Redux," December 15 ( http://www.phoenixnewtimes.com/Issues/2005-12-15/news/feature2.html ) ) when she apparently had to read it in New Times that supplies of meth are coming in from Mexico ( "The New Boss," Joe Watson and Robert Nelson, November 3 ( http://www.phoenixnewtimes.com/Issues/2005-11-03/news/feature.html ) ).

    Heaven help us when the governor of our state is so clueless!

    Source: Phoenix New Times (AZ)
To make a comment simply sign up and become a member!