1. Dear Drugs-Forum readers: We are a small non-profit that runs one of the most read drug information & addiction help websites in the world. We serve over 4 million readers per month, and have costs like all popular websites: servers, hosting, licenses and software. To protect our independence we do not run ads. We take no government funds. We run on donations which average $25. If everyone reading this would donate $5 then this fund raiser would be done in an hour. If Drugs-Forum is useful to you, take one minute to keep it online another year by donating whatever you can today. Donations are currently not sufficient to pay our bills and keep the site up. Your help is most welcome. Thank you.
    PLEASE HELP
  1. chillinwill
    Former smokers swear by the battery-operated devices that deliver nicotine, but some critics aren't swayed.

    Tonya Moraffah takes a deep drag on her cigarette, feels the soothing surge of nicotine and explains what extinguished her 30-year, pack-a-day smoking habit.

    Every evening, she plugs her battery-operated electronic cigarette into a charger. She no longer carries a lighter or sucks breath mints all day in the office.

    “I call myself a non-smoker,” says Moraffah, a 54-year-old executive assistant from Tustin, Calif. “I thank God this came into my life. I’m healthier than I was smoking tobacco. There are other advantages. I don’t want to smell like a cigarette.”

    E-cigarettes contain cartridges of nicotine that release an inhalable vapor. There’s no odor or smoke. They’re marketed as a safe alternative to tobacco’s lung-choking tar and cancer-causing carcinogens.

    But those claims are disputed by the Food and Drug Administration, which has warned that the smokeless cigarettes are harmful. A government analysis of the product, which is made in China, found carcinogens and toxic chemicals. In a pending case, the FDA has been sued over its jurisdiction to regulate the e-cigarettes.

    “Because these products have not been submitted to the FDA for evaluation or approval, at this time the agency has no way of knowing, except for the limited testing it has performed, the levels of nicotine or the amounts or kinds of other chemicals that the various brands of these products deliver to the user,” the FDA said.

    Craig Youngblood, founder of In Life, an Irvine, Calif., distributor of e-cigarettes, disputes the lab findings and said his products contain ingredients that are safe and nontoxic.

    “We’re an alternative to tobacco,” Youngblood says. “We’re not saying we’re going to give you big muscles or you’ll live to 130. … Caffeine and nicotine are not that dissimilar. What’s next? Telling you how many cups of coffee you can have?”

    The models vary. Moraffah prefers a device that looks like a fancy ink pen. Another resembles a regular cigarette except the bright end is blue, not the color of a flame. E-cigarettes cost about $100, plus the cost of nicotine cartridges in various strengths. The devices carry a warning label saying they have not been approved by the FDA for smoking cessation and should be kept out of reach of children.

    “We don’t want to look like a cigarette,” Youngblood says. “We’re, in reality, an anti-cigarette.”

    Youngblood talks like he’s on a crusade against cigarettes. He cites forest fire statistics, the pounds of discarded butts littering beaches. And the federal government’s calculation that more than 430,000 premature deaths each year are caused by tobacco or secondhand smoke.

    But that’s where he and many other antismoking advocates depart.

    Dr. Ira Jeffry Strumpf, a pulmonologist who teaches at UCLA and is a spokesman for the American Lung Association, said e-cigarettes have not been independently proved as a safe alternative to tobacco.

    “The vapor that you inhale is not without risk,” Strumpf says. “It’s not pure nicotine. It has with it some contaminants. When the FDA looked at 19 of these cartridges, they found half the samples contain impurities that are known to be toxic to humans. At least one cartridge contained diethylene glycol, one of the toxic compounds of antifreeze.”

    Strumpf said he’s concerned that e-cigarettes are marketed to people who want to quit smoking but also to those who have never smoked before.

    “The fact they present them in the shape of a cigarette, they’re trying to capitalize on the social aspect of smoking and trying to promote the social appeal of smoking.”

    Brad Rodu, a tobacco researcher at the University of Kentucky in Louisville, considers e-cigarettes a better alternative for smokers who absolutely can’t break their addiction.

    “We can’t say these are perfectly safe, but with everything we know about them we can certainly say they are vastly safer than continuing to light cigarette tobacco on fire and inhaling the 3,000 or 4,000 chemicals that cigarette smokers are doing right now,” Rodu said.

    John Paul, 56, started smoking 23 years ago, and he has tried to stop more than a dozen times. He has spent hundreds of dollars on nicotine gum, patches and prescription pills. None of it worked.

    Paul, a McAllen resident, found e-cigarettes online about a month ago. He hasn’t had lit a traditional smoke since.

    “I’ve had varying degrees of success with quitting,” Paul says. “One time I was able to stop smoking for about four months, but I picked it up again. I’m constantly looking for an alternative to get off this disgusting habit.”

    He said with e-cigarettes, he thinks he found one.

    Zack Quaintance
    December 4, 2009
    The Monitor
    http://www.themonitor.com/articles/day-33197-cigarette-habit.html

Comments

  1. Combination
    The funny thing is they dont quit at all, it's like someone is first smoking heroin, then says "oh, i stopped, im now injecting heroin!". lol :)
  2. chinpokomaster
    Time will tell. These people are effectively Guinea Pigs for these products, but they're such out-and-out consumers, some of them, there's just no point telling them the science. Some people believe anything that can be sold without warning labels plastered all over it is safe ad infinitum. I'm only 23 but I sense that as a species, we're losing our instinctive duty to responsibility and our healthy mistrust of the unknown. We've created a suing culture based around individual rights and some people seem completely unprepared and unwilling to take it upon themselves to be educated and conscious enough to not have to rely on such comforts, which I think is sad.

    Went off on a bit of a tangent or two there, but yeah.

    [/rant]
To make a comment simply sign up and become a member!