1. Dear Drugs-Forum readers: We are a small non-profit that runs one of the most read drug information & addiction help websites in the world. We serve over 4 million readers per month, and have costs like all popular websites: servers, hosting, licenses and software. To protect our independence we do not run ads. We take no government funds. We run on donations which average $25. If everyone reading this would donate $5 then this fund raiser would be done in an hour. If Drugs-Forum is useful to you, take one minute to keep it online another year by donating whatever you can today. Donations are currently not sufficient to pay our bills and keep the site up. Your help is most welcome. Thank you.
    PLEASE HELP

Bad dog! Anger at police pooch named Bono that ALWAYS says there are drugs in a car

Tags:
  1. source
    A dog with a sharp nose for drugs can be a great asset to any police department, but in the case of a German shepherd named Bono, accuracy is not his strongest suit.

    The four-legged crime fighter working for the Virginia State Police has been on a hot streak, detecting drugs nearly every time he’s on the job. In reality, however, illegal narcotics were found just 22 times of the 85 ‘alerts’ by the dog.
    That was the argument public defender Randy Cargill representing Herbert Green, 45, tried to use to suppress the 1.5kilogram of cocaine found in his client’s SUV with Bono’s help, the Roanoke Times reported.

    Earlier this week, federal Judge Glen Conrad denied the motion to suppress, ruling that while Bono’s nose may not be fool-proof, it is sufficient to support a drug charge against Green.
    Cargill argued that Bono’s track record was so poor that police lacked probable cause to search Green’s SUV in the first place.
    Bono ‘may not be a model of canine accuracy,’ Conrad wrote in an opinion filed Thursday in U.S. District Court in Roanoke.

    However, the judge ruled that other factors, including the dog's training and flawless performance during re-certification sessions, were enough to overcome a challenge raised by Green's attorney.

    Prosecutors are now free to try Green on charges of possession of cocaine with intent to distribute.
    Green, of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, was arrested on March 17, 2011, after a state trooper patrolling Interstate 77 in Wythe County, Virginia, pulled him over for having illegally tinted windows and an obscured license plate.
    When Bono was called to the scene, he began to wag his tail furiously and pawed at the vehicle after apparently catching a whiff of something near the rear panel of Green’s Lincoln Navigator, according to earlier testimony.
    Prosecutors said the dog’s ‘alert’ gave police probable cause to search the vehicle, where they found a duffel bag containing cocaine and about $7,000 in cash.
    But after learning that Bono had an accuracy rate of just 26 per cent, Cargill filed a motion seeking to suppress the evidence.
    During a hearing on June 6, Assistant U.S. Attorney Ashley Neese defended the pooch's job performance.

    She explained that in some cases where nothing was found after an alert by Bono, police later determined that cocaine or marijuana had been in the vehicle hours earlier, leaving a scent the dog was trained to detect.
    Bono’s handler Trooper Brian Dillon testified that variables such as wind and the possibility of well-stashed drugs in a car would affect the numbers cited by the defense.
    ‘It's just a big game of hide-and-seek with the canine,’ Dillon said.
    Taking this information into consideration, Judge Conrad put Bono’s accuracy rate closer to 50 per cent.

Comments

  1. source
    Re: Bad dog! Anger at police pooch named Bono that ALWAYS says there are drugs in a c

    That was their defence? "I know the dog found 1.5kilo in my SUV your honour, but I'm still not guilty"

    Made me laugh ;)
  2. Ellisdeee
    Re: Bad dog! Anger at police pooch named Bono that ALWAYS says there are drugs in a c


    In U.S. it is just taken as a huge deal if 'rights' are stepped over even in a guilty persons situation. Ie. if a suspected guilty person is arrested and not read their Miranda rights, a lot of focus would go on the officer for not reading the rights and could possibly nix out what the guy was guilty for in some cases in a court. There are things cops have to follow or be mindful of when convicting/arresting people because if they approach it inappropriately it can throw the whole case out based on principle. I'd say searching people with a dog that has a 25% success (luck) rate is a machine that needs to be put in it's place.
  3. coolhandluke
    Re: Bad dog! Anger at police pooch named Bono that ALWAYS says there are drugs in a c



    how did the police determine this? if they have a crystal ball or access to the all seeing eye of god then why do they need a dog to look for drugs.

    the thing that pisses me off about a lot of law enforcement is they just seem completely incapable of admitting they are either wrong, mistaken, ill informed, whatever. my favorite is when a cop accuses you of something and you say "i didn't do that" and they start flipping the fuck out yelling "so your calling me a lier". its like people can be mistaken, jump to a conclusion, chill the fuck out and listen to what im trying to tell you before we start acting like animals charging their antlers into each other to determine who is the alfa male.

    bottom line, if you have something you dont want the cops to find, be their submissive respectful little bitch, if you have nothing to hide it can be fun to let them know you respect them about as much as you respect any random stranger who behaves like an ass.
To make a comment simply sign up and become a member!