1. Dear Drugs-Forum readers: We are a small non-profit that runs one of the most read drug information & addiction help websites in the world. We serve over 4 million readers per month, and have costs like all popular websites: servers, hosting, licenses and software. To protect our independence we do not run ads. We take no government funds. We run on donations which average $25. If everyone reading this would donate $5 then this fund raiser would be done in an hour. If Drugs-Forum is useful to you, take one minute to keep it online another year by donating whatever you can today. Donations are currently not sufficient to pay our bills and keep the site up. Your help is most welcome. Thank you.
    PLEASE HELP

Cameron rejects decriminalising drugs

By Ubercheese, Dec 10, 2012 | Updated: Dec 10, 2012 | | |
  1. Ubercheese
    The idea of a royal commission to consider decriminalising illegal drugs - as suggested by a group of MPs - has been ruled out by the prime minister.

    In response to the report by the home affairs select committee, David Cameron said the current policy was working in Britain.

    The committee highlighted Portugal's approach, where people found with drugs are not always prosecuted.

    It also asked ministers to monitor cannabis legalisation elsewhere.

    "Drugs use is coming down, the emphasis on treatment is absolutely right, and we need to continue with that to make sure we can really make a difference, " Mr Cameron said.

    "Also, we need to do more to keep drugs out of our prisons.

    "These are the government's priorities and I think we should continue with that rather than have some very, very long-term royal commission."

    A royal commission is a public inquiry created by the head of state into a defined subject and overseen by a commissioner who has quasi-judicial powers.

    Legal highs
    Official figures show that drug use in England and Wales is at its lowest rate under current measurements since 1996.


    Ex-addict, Paul Spittlehouse: "I wasn't affected by the threat of conviction"
    However, there is concern over the growth and prevalence of "legal highs", some of which are banned, amid a recorded rise in deaths linked to their use.

    The committee stops short of supporting a relaxation of legal sanctions for drug use, as suggested by experts at the UK Drug Policy Commission in October, but it does call on ministers to look in detail at the idea.

    Continue reading the main story
    The Dissuasion Commission: Portugal's answer

    In Portugal, resources are focused on drug treatment rather than law enforcement. Users of small amounts of drugs don't face a criminal penalty if they attend a "Dissuasion Commission". It establishes whether the user is addicted or just a casual user.

    The commission stops criminal proceedings if a problem user agrees to treatment - but it will also impose penalties on a user if he or she goes back to drugs. These include bans on certain types of work and restrictions on the user's movements and whom they can meet.

    Fines tend to be reserved for casual drug users because Portuguese experts say it is counter-productive to fine addicts.

    If the individual sticks with the programme and emerges clean, he or she has no criminal record.

    Mark Easton: How Portugal treats drug addicts
    In its wide-ranging report, the cross-party home affairs committee said MPs had visited Portugal as part of attempts to understand different systems of decriminalisation which were being used around the world to manage the harm of drugs, rather than just hand out penalties for their use.

    Portugal has not legalised drugs but it has a system of not imposing criminal penalties on drug users who enter into special programmes designed to end their habits.

    "We were impressed by what we saw of the Portuguese depenalised system," said the MPs. "It had clearly reduced public concern about drug use in that country and was supported by all political parties and the police.

    "The current political debate in Portugal is about how treatment is funded... not about depenalisation itself.

    "Although it is not certain that the Portuguese experience could be replicated in the UK, given societal differences, we believe this is a model that merits significantly closer consideration."

    The committee urged ministers to monitor the effect of plans for cannabis legalisation in the US states of Colorado and Washington and in Uruguay,

    The MPs said that, although drug use was falling, the impact of their use still cost billions and there were questions over whether the international strategy was working.

    They said the time was right for a "fundamental review of all UK drugs policy in the international context" and recommended a royal commission be set up with an end-date of 2015.

    The Home Office disagreed that a Royal Commission was the correct course of action, saying: "Our current laws draw on the best available evidence and as such we have no intention of downgrading or declassifying cannabis."

    However, the Home Office minister Jeremy Browne, a Liberal Democrat, said the government was "open to new ways of thinking".

    He told BBC Radio 4's Today programme: "We are open-minded, we think it's a decent, thoughtful, balanced report. We will consider it carefully."

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-20667139

    This just makes me absolutely furious and frustrated, his own Mp's have called for a review of the obviously flawed drugs laws and he just rejects it out of hand. I believe that he personally knows that the laws are wrong and not fit for purpose but does not want to be seen to be 'soft' on drugs even though, before his election, he was in favour of downgrading MDMA to class B. Just look at the comments on the article most people are in favour of legalisation. Even if you go on the daily mail site the comments are all in favour

Comments

  1. MikePatton
    I hate it when a politician asks a committee to research a certain subject for him just so he can wipe his ass with the recommendations they come up with... This reminds me a bit of Nixon back in 71.
  2. Isodimorphism
    It reminds me of the incident a few years ago with Professor Nutt.

    Politicians will hire people to advise them and then completely ignore their advice and do what they were going to do anyway. It's as if they make a decision, and then ask for advice so that they can validate their own position to themselves. Or worse, a very cynical person might say that they only ask for advice so that they can tell everyone else that they are basing their policies on the opinions of experts.
  3. Baba Blacksheep
    The issues in regards to drug policy reform is beyond the direct decision making capabilities of our current government and standing policies that Cameron has to uphold. He doesn't have much choice as he is leader of his party and is just towing the party line.
    However to refute the prospect of policy change and by saying that our current policy is actually working is very short sighted indeed.
    The Royal Commission will change the way we do things in this country but it will take time as Cameron suggests.
    It has to be a gradual change otherwise we risk everything by being impatient. The tides are moving on this and reform is certainly on its way.
To make a comment simply sign up and become a member!