1. Dear Drugs-Forum readers: We are a small non-profit that runs one of the most read drug information & addiction help websites in the world. We serve over 4 million readers per month, and have costs like all popular websites: servers, hosting, licenses and software. To protect our independence we do not run ads. We take no government funds. We run on donations which average $25. If everyone reading this would donate $5 then this fund raiser would be done in an hour. If Drugs-Forum is useful to you, take one minute to keep it online another year by donating whatever you can today. Donations are currently not sufficient to pay our bills and keep the site up. Your help is most welcome. Thank you.
    PLEASE HELP
  1. KomodoMK
    Cannabis users will escape with £80 fixed penalty fine

    Drug users caught with cannabis will be given £80 on-the-spot fines and will not get a criminal record or have to appear in court under government plans.

    The use of controversial fixed penalty fines - originally created to deal with minor 'nuisance' offences - is being expanded to take in 21 new crimes.

    These include stealing petrol from a filling station, making threats to destroy property and drunken and yobbish behaviour on trains.

    View attachment 6924

    Magistrates attacked the plans at a crisis meeting with Justice Secretary Jack Straw last night. They warned that public confidence in the justice system will be seriously undermined if ministers insist on diverting more and more criminals away from the courts.

    The 'Penalty Notice Disorder' or PND was introduced in 2001, originally to give police a quick and simple tool for dealing with what ministers described as minor 'nuisance' offences.



    But the Government has repeatedly expanded the scheme and added more serious crimes, including shoplifting up to a value of £200. Critics claim such fines have become little more than an occupational hazard for hardcore thieves.

    The latest dramatic expansion of the powers is due to come into effect on January 26.

    Cannabis possession will become punishable with an £80 fine - just as ministers have supposedly toughened the law by reclassifying cannabis from a Class C to a Class B substance.

    That increases the maximum punishment for possession to five years in jail.

    But giving police the option of an instant fine will make it far less likely that offenders will face prosecution.

    Tory justice spokesman Nick Herbert said: 'Handing out the equivalent of a parking ticket for cannabis possession makes a mockery of restoring cannabis to a Class B status and effectively amounts to a downgrading of the drug by stealth.

    'Justice should be seen to be done, but if offenders only receive a penalty notice and no criminal record then victims can receive no compensation. What the Government calls "summary justice" is too often actually soft justice.'

    The Magistrates' Association said in a letter to MPs: 'The singlingout of possession of cannabis for disposal through a PND sets it aside from the other Class B drugs and sends an unacceptable signal to those who use it.'

    They also claimed that many of the crimes on the list ' cannot be a minor offence, as there is a human victim'.

    The row will fuel accusations that Labour has gone 'soft on crime', in part because of the lack of space in Britain's jails.

    A Ministry of Justice spokesman said: 'It is not always necessary for an offender to be taken to court for an offence to be dealt with effectively and to the satisfaction of the victim.'

    Source: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1114623/Cannabis-users-escape-80-fixed-penalty-fine.html

    # Matthew Hickley
    # Mail Online
    # January 14, 2009

Comments

  1. Sippin40oz
    As long as drugs are illegal then on the spot fines are better then a court appearance i suppose! Not having it put on your criminal record could be a very good thing as well if you like to travel as lots of countries getting quite tough on issuing visas to people with drug records.
  2. MrG
    So does that mean that the offender (dope smoker) should have to pay his fine to the victim of his crime, i.e. him/herself?

    Cool.
  3. Joe-(5-HTP)
    There really are two issues to cannabis: illicit dealership and personal use.

    Upgrading it to a class B will increase the justice system's power dealing with the important issue of illicit dealership but will be too heavy handed (IMHO) on the other issue the justice system faces: users.

    This £80 fine strategy will separate the way dealers and users are dealt with, which is important as cannabis using is a victimless crime, whereas illicit sometimes isn't.

    It looks like a step forward.
  4. Sven99
    Any move to reduce the punishments for drug possession are a way forward.

    But I do wish politicians and journalists would stop calling for the use of the criminal justice system to 'send a message' - as law enforcement has little to no effect on levels of use.

    The only message being sent to drug users is 'our drugs policy is schizophrenic'
  5. honourableone
    This is a huge step forward. It means that cannabis users will no longer face prosecution in the workplace due to criminal record. The criminal record is what most users most worry about.
  6. MrG
    That's not entirely true, a fixed penalty is only one of the options.
  7. Nature Boy
    Yeah, I too found that comment laughable. Oh but of course I'm wrong. Every spliff ever smoked buys Osama Bin Laden a new keffiyeh. :laugh:
  8. Pondlife
    Any fines imposed by a UK court have a GBP 15 "victim surcharge" added. This was introduced in 2007. I've put the term in quotes as it doesn't really go to the victim at all, but into a pot that is used to fund general "victim services".

    But this surcharge does not apply to fixed penalty notices, so if a cannabis user were to get a fixed penalty fine, this would not have the GBP 15 surcharge added. I think this is what the article is getting at when it talks about no compensation for victims.
To make a comment simply sign up and become a member!