1. Dear Drugs-Forum readers: We are a small non-profit that runs one of the most read drug information & addiction help websites in the world. We serve over 4 million readers per month, and have costs like all popular websites: servers, hosting, licenses and software. To protect our independence we do not run ads. We take no government funds. We run on donations which average $25. If everyone reading this would donate $5 then this fund raiser would be done in an hour. If Drugs-Forum is useful to you, take one minute to keep it online another year by donating whatever you can today. Donations are currently not sufficient to pay our bills and keep the site up. Your help is most welcome. Thank you.
    PLEASE HELP
  1. chillinwill
    Some Collect Taxes, Some On Hold, Some Say 'No.'

    For Colorado cities, dealing with the issue of medical marijuana in 2009 is a lot like being offered that first joint back in the 1960s - do you join the party or just pass it on?

    Pueblo City Council is stuck in that predicament at the moment, hoping that if it imposes a seven-month moratorium on licensing any medical marijuana businesses until July 1, the Legislature will get busy this spring and adopt statewide regulations on how to do just that.

    It's a dilemma that cities are handling in different ways.

    According to the Colorado Municipal League's latest survey of 95 cities and towns, among those that have taken action:

    Twenty-five already are collecting sales tax from the medical marijuana dispensaries that are operating in their communities, a fact that dispensary owners tout when urging municipalities to license them. Boulder and Colorado Springs are in this group.

    Twenty-six have imposed a moratorium, similar to Pueblo and Pueblo County, in an effort to draft zoning and licensing regulations, or to simply decide whether to allow the dispensaries at all.

    Brighton, Craig, Fountain and Montrose are among the cities doing the same.

    Fifteen cities and towns have just said "no" - refusing to license or allow the dispensaries, noting that even though Colorado voters approved the use of medical marijuana nine years ago, its use or distribution remains a federal crime.

    Greeley and Aurora are among them.

    Medical marijuana users and the people who supply them, referred to in the amendment as caregivers, are impatient that so many communities have issued moratoriums on a process they believe voters legalized in 2000.

    Tom Sexton, a Pueblo man who is trying to open his MediMar Industries dispensary as a storefront operation, protested to Pueblo City Council earlier this week that he is trying to bring his business out of the drug-dealer environment of making sales in houses, restaurants and meetings on country roads - only to collide with moratoriums.

    Council President Vera Ortegon tried to reassure Sexton and other supporters of medical marijuana that the issue isn't legalization.

    "The voters already have decided that. It's a question of how to regulate it," Ortegon said.

    The reason medical marijuana has erupted as an issue for local governments this year is U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder's announcement that the Justice Department would not target medical marijuana growers in states that allowed it. Along with Colorado, those states are Alaska, California, Hawaii, Maine, Maryland, Michigan, Montana, Nevada, New Mexico, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont and Washington.

    In an October memorandum to U.S. attorneys in those states, Deputy Attorney General David Ogden noted that marijuana sales continue to be the largest source of revenue for the Mexican drug cartels that work both sides of the U.S.-Mexico border and that disrupting that network of growers and distributors remains a "core priority" for federal law enforcement.

    Still, in those states with medical marijuana laws, Ogden wrote, "As a general matter, pursuit of these priorities should not focus federal resources in your states on individuals whose actions are in clear and unambiguous compliance with existing state laws providing for the use of medical marijuana."

    Does that mean anyone claiming to be a medical marijuana grower is free from federal prosecution? Not according to Ogden. Urging prosecutors to evaluate each case individually, Ogden advised investigators to look for signs of illegal activity in association with a dispensary, such as the possession or unlawful use of weapons, violence, reports of sales to minors, indications the business is being used to launder money from other businesses or the presence of other illegal drugs.

    Pueblo Police Chief Jim Billings summed up the law enforcement quandary for council this week by saying his officers need to investigate reports that marijuana is being grown in the city.

    While Amendment 20 allows medical marijuana users, or their caregiver, to have up to six plants, the city code does not permit it.

    State lawmakers are working on the issue.

    Pueblo legislators confirmed this week that legislation is being drafted in cooperation with Colorado Attorney General John Suthers, law enforcement and even growers, to establish a general template for how to regulate dispensaries. That legislation could be very detailed, prohibiting dispensaries from operating near schools and even establishing state and local licensing fees. But other details could be left up to local governments, meaning council may still have to oversee the drafting of zoning and licensing regulations.

    Peter Roper
    November 26, 2009
    Chieftain
    http://www.chieftain.com/articles/2009/11/26/news/local/doc4b0e055be435e900965977.txt

Comments

To make a comment simply sign up and become a member!