1. Dear Drugs-Forum readers: We are a small non-profit that runs one of the most read drug information & addiction help websites in the world. We serve over 4 million readers per month, and have costs like all popular websites: servers, hosting, licenses and software. To protect our independence we do not run ads. We take no government funds. We run on donations which average $25. If everyone reading this would donate $5 then this fund raiser would be done in an hour. If Drugs-Forum is useful to you, take one minute to keep it online another year by donating whatever you can today. Donations are currently not sufficient to pay our bills and keep the site up. Your help is most welcome. Thank you.

Confronting the Truth About our Deadly Drug Policy on Overdose Awareness Day

By SmokeTwibz, Sep 1, 2012 | | |
  1. SmokeTwibz
    Friday, August 31, is dedicated to understanding a new epidemic.

    August 31 is International Overdose Awareness Day. It is always a difficult day for many people, for a variety of reasons. It’s difficult to remember the people we loved whose lives were cut needlessly short. It’s difficult to rouse a community out of apathy around this issue. And it’s difficult to admit that our best efforts to keep all people drug-free all of the time will fail.
    But we have to admit it.

    We have to acknowledge that a certain percentage of the population will never be entirely drug-free and we have to figure out what to do about that. It’s costly and regressive to continually respond with arrests, drug courts and incarceration.

    The Obama administration has appropriated the rhetoric of public health workers who have worked diligently for years to reduce the number of overdose deaths nationwide. The administration talks about a "public health approach," and "not being able to arrest our way out of the problem." The need to understand chronic drug misuse as an illness is best left to physicians, they proclaim. They talk about the need to prevent drug abuse in the first place by increasing education for young people, and they talk about expanding access to treatment and promoting recovery.

    But they never talk about what to do with all of the people who currently, and perhaps always will, use drugs.

    This is a fundamental problem with how our government approaches the incredibly long, unfailing reality of drug use in our country. We have always used drugs. We just have a hard time admitting it and figuring out how to manage it.

    We know that many people who experience an overdose are simply people who use drugs casually and infrequently or people with pain who accidentally take too much medicine. These are not people who are breaking into homes to steal television sets to feed habits, but people with jobs, people pursuing an education, regular people who enjoy the occasional Xanax and cocktails. Some of them may even use prescription painkillers to get a buzz.

    Some may disagree with their impulse to become intoxicated, or chastise them for not taking their medicine as prescribed. But that’s an occasional reality for thousands of people across the country. They may not need drug treatment, and they certainly don’t need to be incarcerated. But they do need access to the information that can save their lives, or the life of someone with whom they may occasionally use drugs. And many of them need naloxone. And that’s a problem.

    Naloxone is unquestionably the most effective tool we have to reverse an opioid overdose. But the medicine is scarce and it’s becoming increasingly expensive. While still a comparative bargain for an incredibly safe drug with a very low side-effect profile, save for causing withdrawal among opiate-dependent people, it’s being priced out of reach for many of the programs that would like to make it more available.

    A small grassroots effort has sprung up to bring attention to the problem and help raise urgently needed funds. I’m proud to be a part of it. But there’s something just a bit depressing about a small handful of activists trying valiantly to raise more awareness about this life-saving drug, let alone help raise funds for overdose prevention programs.

    In a recent op-ed on Huffington Post, drug czar Gil Kerlikowske from the Office of National Drug Control Policy (ONDCP) said, “The administration supports the use of naloxone by public health and law enforcement professionals because we have seen how effective the drug can be.” It was an intelligent response to the overdose crisis based on science.

    AlterNet / By Meghan Ralston
    August 30, 2012

    Author Bio

    My name is Jason Jones. I'm from Rochester, MN and I'm 35 years old. I scrap metal and work as grounds keeper at a local trailer park. In the winter, I shovel a bunch of driveways and sidewalks to make some extra money and to stay busy. In my free time, I try to find interesting articles about the war on drugs that I can post on Drugs-Forum, so that the information can reach a wider audience.


  1. profesor
    Either the article should spend more time describing the problems with the availability and increased prices of nolaxone (I've usually heard it called by the brand name Narcan, although it is available in generic form, patents have run out), or stick with the more general problems with drug policy.
    It sounds like the author thinks nolaxone is a magic bullet to the problems of opiate overdoses, and that's not the case. Maybe she was writing under the influence of Xanax. ;)
To make a comment simply sign up and become a member!