1. Dear Drugs-Forum readers: We are a small non-profit that runs one of the most read drug information & addiction help websites in the world. We serve over 4 million readers per month, and have costs like all popular websites: servers, hosting, licenses and software. To protect our independence we do not run ads. We take no government funds. We run on donations which average $25. If everyone reading this would donate $5 then this fund raiser would be done in an hour. If Drugs-Forum is useful to you, take one minute to keep it online another year by donating whatever you can today. Donations are currently not sufficient to pay our bills and keep the site up. Your help is most welcome. Thank you.
    PLEASE HELP

conviction upheld to fake crack dealer

  1. psyvision2000
    <TABLE cellPadding=2 width="100%">
    <T>
    <TR>
    <TD vAlign=center width="100%" background=http://i1.bluelight.nu/p/10.gif bgColor=#e8e8f1>Conviction Upheld For Man Who Sold Fake Crack Cocaine 23-09-2005 02:52</TD>
    <TD align=right bgColor=#e8e8f1>(#3508237)</TD></TR></T></TABLE>
    <TABLE cellSpacing=2 cellPadding=0 width="100%">
    <T>
    <TR>
    <TD>Conviction Upheld For Man Who Sold Fake Crack Cocaine
    Taylor Given 4 Years Probation For Crime
    September 22, 2005

    DENVER -- A man who police said sold fake crack cocaine to at least two people in Denver several years ago was properly convicted of possession with intent to distribute an imitation controlled substance, the Colorado Court of Appeals ruled Thursday.

    Ronald Taylor, 43, appealed his conviction, saying there was no evidence that showed he told others he was selling them crack.

    Taylor, who was sentenced to four years of probation, was arrested shortly after the apparent drug deal, and after a pat-down search, gave officers what appeared to be rocks of crack cocaine.

    The substance turned out to be crushed acetaminophen, the main ingredient in Tylenol, but prosecutors charged Taylor with distribution and possession of a controlled substance and possession with intent to sell an imitation controlled substance. The jury acquitted him of the first two charges.

    A three-judge panel of the appeals court said the evidence showed that Taylor knew or should have known that the items he was selling could be perceived to be illegal drugs.

    Taylor had argued that to support a conviction, prosecutors had to prove he
    told others he was selling crack cocaine. The ruling, however, said state law requires the jury to look at the circumstances surrounding the sale of imitation drugs, and it said there was enough evidence to support the conviction.

    That means a conviction is possible if the defendant knows that people could believe an item is an illegal drug based on its appearance.

    "Here, the acetaminophen was formed and packaged in a manner normally used for illicit controlled substances, defendant was observed using evasive tactics to conceal it in his pants, and defendant was observed engaging in a transaction similar to that ordinarily used for `street level' narcotics sales," the ruling said.

    Link</TD></TR></T></TABLE>

Comments

To make a comment simply sign up and become a member!