1. Dear Drugs-Forum readers: We are a small non-profit that runs one of the most read drug information & addiction help websites in the world. We serve over 4 million readers per month, and have costs like all popular websites: servers, hosting, licenses and software. To protect our independence we do not run ads. We take no government funds. We run on donations which average $25. If everyone reading this would donate $5 then this fund raiser would be done in an hour. If Drugs-Forum is useful to you, take one minute to keep it online another year by donating whatever you can today. Donations are currently not sufficient to pay our bills and keep the site up. Your help is most welcome. Thank you.
    PLEASE HELP

D.C Prepares for Battle on Single-Cigar Sales Ban Proposal

Rating:
4/5,
  1. chillinwill
    Opponents of a Washington, D.C., bill that proposes a ban on single-cigar sales will get the chance to voice their concerns at a hearing scheduled for the end of the month.

    The bill's intention is to reduce marijuana use by amending the Drug Paraphernalia Act of 1982 to ban the selling of "single cigar products." These products are broadly defined as an "individual cigar, cigar leaf wrapper, flavored or non-flavored cigar that is referred to as a blunt, blunt wrap, or any other tobacco product that may be used in the ingesting, inhaling, or introduction of marijuana to the human body."

    In essence, the bill looks to combat the act of "blunting," or replacing the tobacco filler in a cigar with marijuana. However, to the chagrin of cigar store shop owners, the bill's language does not attempt to distinguish cheap blunts from premium, handmade cigars.

    "It's scary because it's open ended," said John Anderson, owner of W. Curtis Draper, a tobacconist located in Washington, D.C. Anderson plans to meet with his council representative before attending the public hearing.

    Glynn Loope, executive director of the Cigar Rights of America, opposes the bill and believes it highlights the importance of the need to create a better legal definition for cigars.

    "It is very, very bothersome that premium cigars could even be included in a bill like that," said Loope.

    Chris McCalla, legislative director of the International Premium Cigar and Pipe Retailers, went a step further, blasting the proposal in a press release.

    "The bottom line is that this is bad legislation that won't do what it is intended to do — stop the use of marijuana. The only thing it will do is irreparable harm to owners of cigar stores, their employees and loyal customers who enjoy premium cigars," he said.

    David Berkebile, owner of Georgetown Tobacco, believes tobacconists have a good chance to defeat the bill, but he still plans to fight it at the public hearing.

    "I'll be meeting with Jack Evans, our councilman, beforehand. He has been supportive of our business in the past," said Berkebile.

    The meeting is set for September 29 at 10 a.m.

    By Andrew Nagy
    September 9, 2009
    Cigar Aficionado
    http://www.cigaraficionado.com/Cigar/CA_Features/CA_Feature_Basic_Template/0,2344,2864,00.html

Comments

  1. Master_Khan
    It is interesting to see that even as we rush headlong towards the end of Marijuana prohibition in the USA, there are still a few retards out there that think that they can stem the tide with ridiculous stuff like 'combatting the blunt'. If it wasn't so pathetic it would be funny.
  2. Valseedian
    that's about as good of an idea as outlawing tin-foil cause kids use it to make pipes...

    aside from that, most REAL smokers swim knows smoke white-boys or own a nice pipe.

    tho swim does enjoy the occasional mini blunt.
  3. Ad8TcHd
    Swim heard they were going to schedgule dirt, water and sun to put a stop to the wild wild west in Cali, lot's 'o folk making good buck for green gold tax free, uncle sam no like...
To make a comment simply sign up and become a member!