1. Dear Drugs-Forum readers: We are a small non-profit that runs one of the most read drug information & addiction help websites in the world. We serve over 4 million readers per month, and have costs like all popular websites: servers, hosting, licenses and software. To protect our independence we do not run ads. We take no government funds. We run on donations which average $25. If everyone reading this would donate $5 then this fund raiser would be done in an hour. If Drugs-Forum is useful to you, take one minute to keep it online another year by donating whatever you can today. Donations are currently not sufficient to pay our bills and keep the site up. Your help is most welcome. Thank you.
    PLEASE HELP
  1. chillinwill
    The war on drugs will be on the ballot in California this November. The nation will watch the state decide whether to tax and regulate marijuana or continue to arrest adults for possession of this plant.

    The vote on the Regulate, Control and Tax Cannabis Act of 2010 will impact many of the most important issues in the country today. Californians will express how they want police resources used, if adults who consume marijuana should be criminalized, how best to deal with the tragic violence in Mexico, and what our priorities should be in tough economic times. It’s no wonder that seven months out, this issue has already generated thousands of news stories around the world.

    Opposition to this reform has crystallized within the drug war establishment, and so has their spin. Here are their top five talking points and the truth beyond them:

    Drug Warrior Spin #1: Why would we authorize another harmful substance in our society?

    The reality is that marijuana is already widely available in our society. Like it or not, it’s a mainstream recreational drug consumed by millions, including one in ten Californians last year, according to federal data. The California ballot initiative simply acknowledges that marijuana is here and that it’s more sensible to regulate this massive market, like we do with even more harmful drugs like cigarettes and alcohol. Prohibition of highly popular substances never works and brings terrible collateral damage. Alcohol prohibition didn’t keep people from drinking, but it did give us Al Capone and gun battles in the streets. No one dies over sales of Budweiser today.

    Drug Warrior Spin #2: Regulation will cause marijuana consumption to skyrocket with addiction rates to match.

    The truth is rates of marijuana consumption aren’t determined by penalties against it. If they were, the U.S. – which arrests an astounding 750,000 people for marijuana possession every year – wouldn’t have double the consumption rate of The Netherlands, where marijuana sales have been tolerated for decades. That principle holds true across this country as some states that lowered penalties against marijuana possession years ago have among the lowest rates of use while some states that retained harsh marijuana laws have among the highest. As for addiction, the risk of becoming dependent on marijuana is mild compared to most other drugs including alcohol and tobacco. In fact, most people who enter treatment for marijuana addiction in this country today are referred by the criminal justice system, but 65% don’t even meet the standard criteria for dependence.

    Drug Warrior Spin #3: Regulating marijuana will aid drug cartels.

    It is practically Orwellian to claim that state regulation of marijuana would benefit criminal cartels. More than 20,000 Mexicans have died in the last three years thanks to prohibition. There is nothing inherent about the plant that has caused these brutal murders. Banning marijuana makes it worth more than gold, so valuable that people are willing to kill each other over the right to sell it. By regulating marijuana and beginning to bring its production and distribution under the rule of law, we would eliminate the cartels’ existing monopoly and dramatically siphon their profits. They would be the biggest losers in this reform.

    Drug Warrior Spin #4: Regulating marijuana would cost society more than the taxes it generates.

    Taxing marijuana like alcohol statewide would generate $1. 4 billion in California alone, according to the state Board of Equalization. Californians will also save hundreds of millions in scarce law enforcement dollars currently devoted to enforcing these futile laws. Yet opponents say that drugged driving, increased health care costs, and lost productivity will end up costing much more than taxes would generate. By that logic, alcohol, which causes nearly 100,000 American deaths annually, should be illegal and warrant life without parole. The bottom line is that marijuana is California’s largest agricultural commodity, freely consumed by millions with no regulations or protections, and with no financial benefit to the state. In this economic climate, this is a reality we literally can’t afford to ignore any longer.

    Drug Warrior Spin #5: What kind of message does regulating marijuana send to kids?

    The irony is that failed marijuana prohibition does nothing to protect kids. Despite 30 years of “Just Say No,” half of high-school seniors admit to trying marijuana. Students are more likely to smoke marijuana than cigarettes and say it’s easier to buy marijuana than alcohol because drug dealers don’t ask for ID. Even more chilling, of the 78,000 Californians arrested for marijuana offenses in 2008, one in five was a child under 18 and half were under 30. Out of control access and mass arrests are prohibition’s true impact on our youth. State regulation will reduce that access, separate marijuana from harder drugs, and allow us to focus on effective youth drug education programs.

    We will see these arguments play out repeatedly over the next six months. In the end, California will get to choose between two very different models of dealing with marijuana in our society.

    By Tony Newman and Stephen Gutwillig
    April 23, 2010
    AlterNet
    http://www.alternet.org/drugs/14659...g_talking_points_of_marijuana_prohibitionists

Comments

  1. Erumelithil
    It would be great if this was passed. Another precedent and example would be set, that will help attitudes progress.

    Reading the article above is a little frustrating, 5 thoughtful, valid and sensible points which can sum up the whole spirit and intent of the movement, clearly and concisely. The frustration stems from knowing that here in Ireland, such a campaign would be met with hysterical, ignorant hostility by a significant portion of the population.
    Over here, the response to progressive campaigns which share their message in clearly worded, concise, intelligent and persuasive points (like in the OP), is to misinterpret them, twist the words, accuse the writer of being a liar and suggesting that their true intent is to sabotage society.
    We're far too conservative and too prone to pre-judgement of issues.
  2. bobfocfreezone
    Logic and reasoning isn't an Irish strongpoint unfortunately.Swim has a mammy, one of those notorious mammies who listen to the general riff-raff on the radio and proclaims it as gospel.Swim has tried to reason but it is like talking to a wall =P The older irish generation are a conservative bunch but perhaps we will see massive change in the years to come.
  3. platitude
    That sounds a LOT like swim's country. Last week there were a number of marches in Argentina claiming for the decriminalization of marihuana and other drugs use. Almost every comment swim read from people subscribed to on-line newspapers that covered the subject were aggressive. Today we have two polarized generations, the old one that thinks that everyone who uses any kind of drug is the Antichrist, and the young people who are so much more open minded . It may sound cruel, but swim thinks that we have to keep pushing while we wait to the old generation to die, leaving their place to the young ones :s They are too old, it's just to late for them to change. The won't, they can't.
To make a comment simply sign up and become a member!