1. Dear Drugs-Forum readers: We are a small non-profit that runs one of the most read drug information & addiction help websites in the world. We serve over 4 million readers per month, and have costs like all popular websites: servers, hosting, licenses and software. To protect our independence we do not run ads. We take no government funds. We run on donations which average $25. If everyone reading this would donate $5 then this fund raiser would be done in an hour. If Drugs-Forum is useful to you, take one minute to keep it online another year by donating whatever you can today. Donations are currently not sufficient to pay our bills and keep the site up. Your help is most welcome. Thank you.

Drug dealer turns the tables on taxman

By Alfa, Nov 29, 2004 | |
  1. Alfa
    Drug dealer turns the tables on taxman
    <TABLE style="WIDTH: 405px; HEIGHT: 44px; : #ffffff" cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0>
    <TD =caption style="WIDTH: 360px">
    August 22 2002 at 07:01AM </TD></TR>
    <TD style="HEIGHT: 1px; : #cccccc" colSpan=2></TD></TR></T></TABLE>
    <TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=23>
    <TD =svarticletext>

    Sydney - An Australian court has given a convicted heroin dealer the all-clear to write off A$220 000 (about R1,3-million) in stolen drug money from his tax bill.

    The Federal Court ruled that as jailed felon Francesco Dominico La Rosa had earned his taxable income through selling drugs, he was likewise entitled to deduct from his taxes expenses incurred as part of his criminal endeavours.

    Perth resident La Rosa was jailed for 12 years in 1996 for importing and selling heroin.

    As soon as he was behind bars, Australia's meticulous tax authorities pounced and presented him with a A$450 000 tax bill based on what court proceedings had revealed about his estimated illicit income.

    La Rosa fired back with a claim to deduct the A$220 000 he said he had buried in the garden of his daughter's home and which he intended to use to buy more drugs.

    He said the money had been stolen by other criminals when he went to make a deal.

    He had already won an earlier court case but the Australian Taxation Office appealed.

    Federal Court Justice Robert Nicholson rejected the appeal on Wednesday, according to court documents.

    "The findings of the tribunal are that the occasion of the loss occurred during an intended drug purchase and was directly connected with the carrying on of the taxpayer's illicit drug dealing business," said Nicholson in his ruling.

    "For these reasons I do not consider that this ground of appeal can succeed." </TD></TR></T></TABLE>


To make a comment simply sign up and become a member!