1. Dear Drugs-Forum readers: We are a small non-profit that runs one of the most read drug information & addiction help websites in the world. We serve over 4 million readers per month, and have costs like all popular websites: servers, hosting, licenses and software. To protect our independence we do not run ads. We take no government funds. We run on donations which average $25. If everyone reading this would donate $5 then this fund raiser would be done in an hour. If Drugs-Forum is useful to you, take one minute to keep it online another year by donating whatever you can today. Donations are currently not sufficient to pay our bills and keep the site up. Your help is most welcome. Thank you.
    PLEASE HELP
  1. Bad Rabbits
    For those not yet aware, all herbal supplements will be illegal in the EU from the 1st May.

    There is a lot of confusion, I have been trying to get straight facts for days. It seems nobody really knows what the end result of this will be. I won't try and summarise my understanding of the situation because it will be misleading.

    Its pretty much all wrapped up, your MP will tell you that there is nothing that can be done. There is LOADS more on this, the more I read the sicker I get.

    This has been in the pipeline for years, nobody asked me. I love democracy.

    Old article from the Independant:

    Europe to ban hundreds of herbal remedies
    :applause:

    Safety concerns sparked drive to outlaw products
    By Jeremy Laurance, Health Editor

    Thursday, 30 December 2010

    Hundreds of herbal medicinal products will be banned from sale in Britain next year under what campaigners say is a "discriminatory and disproportionate" European law.

    With four months to go before the EU-wide ban is implemented, thousands of patients face the loss of herbal remedies that have been used in the UK for decades.

    From 1 May 2011, traditional herbal medicinal products must be licensed or prescribed by a registered herbal practitioner to comply with an EU directive passed in 2004. The directive was introduced in response to rising concern over adverse effects caused by herbal medicines.

    The UK Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) has issued more than a dozen safety alerts in the past two years, including one over aristolochia, a banned toxic plant derivative which caused kidney failure in two women.

    Herbal practitioners say it is impossible for most herbal medicines to meet the licensing requirements for safety and quality, which are intended to be similar to those for pharmaceutical drugs, because of the cost of testing.

    According to the Alliance for Natural Health (ANH), which represents herbal practitioners, not a single product used in traditional Chinese medicine or ayurvedic medicine has been licensed. In Europe, around 200 products from 27 plant species have been licensed but there are 300 plant species in use in the UK alone.

    The ANH estimates the cost of obtaining a licence at between £80,000 and £120,000 per herb. They say this is affordable for single herbal products with big markets, such as echinacea, a remedy for colds and flu, but will drive small producers of medicines containing multiple herbs out of business.

    Under EU law, statutorily regulated herbal practitioners will be permitted to continue prescribing unlicensed products. But the Coalition Government and the previous Labour administration have delayed plans to introduce a statutory herbal practitioner register.

    This means thousands of patients who rely on herbal treatments face being denied access to them. Medical organisations, including the MHRA, have warned the measures may drive patients to obtain herbal medicines over the internet – where risks are much greater.

    Michael McIntyre, the chairman of the European Herbal and Traditional Medicine Practitioners Association, said: "The problem is you can't get a licence for many herbal medicines because they are grown in people's back gardens and you can't patent them. The implications are very serious. Patients want to receive treatment from trained and qualified practitioners but unless we have regulation they can't have confidence in who is treating them. The worst outcome is that patients will end up going to the internet for their herbal medicines where there are no controls."

    Dr Rob Verkerk, of the ANH, said: "Thousands of people across Europe rely on herbal medicines to improve their quality of life. They don't take them because they are sick – they take them to keep healthy. If these medicines are taken off the market, people will try and find them elsewhere, such as from the internet, where there is a genuine risk they will get low quality products, that either don't work or are adulterated."

    The MHRA said it had received applications for licences for 166 herbal products, of which 78 had been granted. Sir Alasdair Breckenridge, chairman of the MHRA, said a register of herbalists was essential. "Just because something is natural doesn't mean it is safe," he said. "It is terribly important to have responsible people who have undergone training prescribing these products."

    Edzard Ernst, professor of complementary medicine at the University of Exeter, said proposals for regulation would be worthless unless they required practitioners to follow best evidence for the effects of their remedies. "It is in danger of regulating nonsense – and that must result in nonsense," he said.

    A review of the codes of conduct by which alternative practitioners were bound found the "vast majority" did not include an obligation to report adverse effects, he said. The only exception was the Chinese Herbal Medicine Code which advised members to report "cases of industrial poisoning or accident".
    A spokesman for the Department of Health said no decision had been made on a statutory register of herbal practitioners. "The Government is aware of the strength of feeling on this issue and is actively exploring options."

Comments

  1. Alfa
  2. Bad Rabbits
    Thankyou Alfa, just what I needed to see.

    People don't realise how much this is going to worsen things for a lot of people, I am always hearing of people who supplement and use medicinal herbs (non recreational) on these boards.

    There is a petition, actually two... but too late anyway.
  3. Alfa
    I wonder if this means that herbal smartshop products are going to be banned. After all these are herbal supplements with a pharmacological effect. Does anyone know?
  4. Bad Rabbits
    With most of the active ingredients being naturally available, however often rare and unusual, I believe this will affect them.

    I know the enforcing of this directive is going to be light at first, but definitely we will start seeing things disappearing with time.

    A lot can be decided with an intended use statement, I wonder how many herbal supplements will become available raw for cooking/tea or just plain not for human consumption?

    For example, if vitamins do become available on a prescription only basis, what is to stop food ingredient suppliers selling bags of Absorbic acid as they always have done? As a necessary food ingredient.
  5. Myxomor
    Thanks for your info!

    Will this ban also overcross ethnobotanical?:s Any ideas?
  6. Alfa
    overcross?
  7. Phenoxide
    My understanding is that this directive prohibits the sale of unregistered herbal products only as medicines (i.e. for therapeutic purposes). Herbal products will have to go through a registration process where they provide documentation that assures the product to be safe and effective (though the registration is not as stringent as would be required for filing a new drug application to the FDA etc.). That shouldn't affect ethnobotanicals since they are rarely if ever sold as medicines.

    I'm sure we've all seen those traditional chinese medicine shops with adverts in the window claiming to cure everything ever, so I'd assume it's this kind of practice they're looking to clamp down on. No doubt the pharma lobby had a big hand in forcing this issue through the system since they've always argued there's an imbalance between how pharma are regulated compared to 'herbal' products.

    The only aspect of the directive that might cause prove troublesome is that it suggets non-medicinal herbal products should be regulated under each nation's food safety laws, which I don't think happens in most countries at the moment. That could make it problematic to sell certain ethnobotanicals for human consumption if they aren't approved as food safe, but then most ethnobotanicals aren't explicitly sold for human consumption at all. That'd also depend on the specifics of a nation's food laws though.

    It's a little too early to say for sure what effect this directive will have. It will largely depend on how each EU member nation applies and enforces the directive within the framework of their own laws. I don't forsee it being a big problem with regard to ethnobotanical sales though.
  8. Myxomor
    Sorry for inconvenience Alfa. I mean - will the entheogens be banned according to this directive?
To make a comment simply sign up and become a member!