1. Dear Drugs-Forum readers: We are a small non-profit that runs one of the most read drug information & addiction help websites in the world. We serve over 4 million readers per month, and have costs like all popular websites: servers, hosting, licenses and software. To protect our independence we do not run ads. We take no government funds. We run on donations which average $25. If everyone reading this would donate $5 then this fund raiser would be done in an hour. If Drugs-Forum is useful to you, take one minute to keep it online another year by donating whatever you can today. Donations are currently not sufficient to pay our bills and keep the site up. Your help is most welcome. Thank you.
    PLEASE HELP
  1. rxbandit
    According to an FDA statement, marijuana is listed in Schedule I of the Controlled Substances Act (CSA) - this is the most restrictive schedule. The FDA agrees with this Schedule I listing, as does the Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA).

    The three criteria for placement in Schedule I, says the FDA (21 U.S.C 812b 1) are currently met by Marijuana. It listed as the three main reasons against the use of marijuana for medical use as:

    1. It has a high potential for abuse
    2. It has no currently accepted medical use in treatment in the USA
    3. It has a lack of accepted safety for use under medical supervision

    The FDA also added that current evidence shows marijuana is harmful to human health. It cited several studies and reports done by HHS, FDA, SAMHSA and NIDA, which indicate that scientific evidence supporting marijuana's medical use is lacking (for treatment in the USA). Also, the FDA said animal or human data supporting efficacy and safety of marijuana for general medical use is lacking.

    There are alternatives (approved by the FDA) to smoking marijuana for medical use, said the agency.

    The FDA's role is to make sure a drug is safe and effective before it is allowed into the market.

    The agency went on to say that without clear evidence of safety and efficacy through well regulated clinical trials, it cannot approve a drug. It would not serve the interests of public health, as patients would be exposed to ineffective and potentially dangerous drug products.

    The agency criticised moves made by a number of states to make smoked marijuana available for some medical conditions (upon a doctor's recommendation). 11 states have legalized the use of marijuana for medical purposes. The FDA has no power in enforcing its statement on those states (would be the role of the DEA).

    Saying there is no sound scientific study contradicts a study carried out in 1999 by the Institute of Medicine. This study did find some benefits in using marijuana for particular conditions.

    At medical news today we have received over the years hundreds of emails from patients worldwide whose lives have been made more tolerable thanks to marijuana.

Comments

  1. zasabi
    well it doesnt really matta dat it has medical properties or not cuz marinol has all medical effects the same without the carcinogens and the fun
  2. sadskills1987
    i don't know about the rest of you, but i think the FDA is just the DEA's hand-puppet these days. it's almost like the entire US government is slowly falling under control of it. we have to find out a way to at least stop their propaganda.
  3. party boy
    Same here in Belgium, same everywhere...maybe a little more in the U.S., it's just a question of history if it is less controlled here ( like the guns problematic wich astonish us in europe everyday, but you're born with it).

    These organisation may rule the world, they're the minority and can't control everything.

    You want it to change ? wake up early, make a program and put you on a list for the elections :D

    I'm too lazy, i'll just try to raise my kids right...;)
To make a comment simply sign up and become a member!