1. Dear Drugs-Forum readers: We are a small non-profit that runs one of the most read drug information & addiction help websites in the world. We serve over 4 million readers per month, and have costs like all popular websites: servers, hosting, licenses and software. To protect our independence we do not run ads. We take no government funds. We run on donations which average $25. If everyone reading this would donate $5 then this fund raiser would be done in an hour. If Drugs-Forum is useful to you, take one minute to keep it online another year by donating whatever you can today. Donations are currently not sufficient to pay our bills and keep the site up. Your help is most welcome. Thank you.
    PLEASE HELP
  1. bananaskin
    Bill proposes tougher penalties for renters than for homeowners

    Tenants caught growing as few as six marijuana plants in their dwellings could face automatic jail terms of at least nine months, under a federal drug-sentencing bill revived Wednesday that imposes harsher penalties on home renters than on homeowners.

    The bill, introduced for the third time after dying twice before, proposes mandatory minimum jail terms for a variety of drug-related crimes, removing discretion for judges to sentence as they see fit.

    The Harper government's proposed legislation imposes stiffer punishment on renters than it does on homeowners, because involving a third party is one of several aggravating factors.

    "It is going to have a really detrimental affect on young people," predicted Tara Lyons, a fourth-year sociology student at Carleton University in Ottawa.

    "More young people rent dwellings because they can't afford to buy their own, so this bill sets up a situation where the policies are crafted in the name of protecting children, but they are just presenting more harm to young people."

    The bill proposes to impose mandatory minimum terms for drug-trafficking crimes, ranging from one to three years.

    Lyons, executive director of Canadian Students for Sensible Drug Policy, was one of more than a dozen witnesses who urged the federal government, during House of Commons committee hearings last spring, to scrap its drug-sentencing bill.

    The bar for being caught growing marijuana for the purposes of trafficking is generally five plants, which would garner a minimum six-month jail term.

    However, for anyone captured under any of the broad aggravating factors, the minimum jail term is increased to nine months. It goes up to a one-year minimum for growing up to 200 plants for the purpose of selling, and two years for up to 500 plants.

    Other aggravating factors include such things as whether a weapon was found on the premises, whether the location was considered unsafe, and whether the pot production posed a danger to the public in a residential area.

    The Senate, which considered the bill last fall, increased the bar to 200 plants for automatic incarceration, but left it at five in cases involving aggravating factors.

    Justice Minister Rob Nicholson on Wednesday ignored the Senate amendments and resurrected his bill as it passed in the House of Commons last June, with the support of the Liberals.

    New Democratic Party MP Libby Davies, a vocal opponent of mandatory minimum sentences for drug-related crimes, warned Wednesday that mandatory terms for drug crimes will cost billions because they will "clog up" the prison system.
    © Copyright (c) The Vancouver Sun

    By Janice Tibbetts, Canwest News Service
    May 6, 2010

    http://www.vancouversun.com/Homes/Feds+pitch+more+jail+time+growing/2993208/story.html

Comments

  1. dyingtomorrow
    I think it is interesting that they are admitting that drug laws harm people, especially young people.
  2. Terrapinzflyer
    I can actually see some sense in this- though possibly for different reasons. I'n vancouver BC I have seen figures that upwards of 70% of houses on the rental market have been used for marijuana grows. And when we are talking commercial grows, it often leaves the house uninhabitable, at least without serious work. Water damage, mold, altered electrical wiring, holes cut in walls, ceilings and floors, whole walls removed, the list goes on. In northern california, and indeed, much of the west coast, it is ~very~ hard to rent a house if you seem like you might be involved in growing for exactly these reasons- this kind of damage to rentals is alarmingly common.

    But really, this kind of thing should be punished, and harshly, under destruction of private property, vandalism, breach of contract, public nuissance type of laws and not added as drug related charges.
  3. Samadhi
    Agreed. What happens in the confides of ones home as long as it doesn't cause harm or nuisance to the neighborhood should be respected as personal property. Everyone does something illegal, god knows if for some reason a police officer came into his home, he'd be locked up. Swim thinks that if a grower is unconscious enough to damage a house that badly, they should pay for the damage, not go to jail for something that caused no problems technically while it was there (besides destruction of property). Swim is all about sustainable grows that are contained and clean, not converting someones money-maker (rental property) into a hydroponic mold lab because they have no consideration for others property and their eyes on greenbacks.

    Putting stricter penalties on pot growers only makes it so that when they get released from prison they have only one option: to keep growing. Nobody will hire a felon with conspiracy to manufacture a controlled substance fresh out of prison. Nobody. It is a very backwards mentality that jail will keep people from doing illegal deeds, as it only keeps them from doing so for the period they are in jail after they are out, it is back to human instinct and survival... more often than not, most fall back into what got them into jail.
To make a comment simply sign up and become a member!