FEDS SAY POT SHOPS ILLEGAL
Colfax Store Owner 'Ashamed' Of House Vote
If it were up to the federal government, marijuana distribution stores
such as the one operated by Jim Henry in Colfax would be shut down
Actually, it is up to the feds, according to a vote by the U.S. House
of Representatives on Wednesday. The vote sent a resounding message to
California and eight other states that allow medical marijuana: Our
laws trump yours.
The house voted to let the federal government continue prosecuting
people who use marijuana for medical reasons in those states. The
268-148 vote turned aside an amendment by Democrats and some
Republicans that would have barred the federal government from
preventing states from implementing their own medical marijuana laws.
"I will be damned if I stop selling medicine," said Henry, owner of
Golden State Patient Care Collective. "I am ashamed of (the
government) for that. We help sick people. Some of these people will
be dead in six months. They would be dead in three months if it wasn't
for medical marijuana."
California is one of nine states that have passed laws allowing people
to use marijuana if recommended by a doctor. The others are Alaska,
Colorado, Hawaii, Maine, Nevada, Oregon, Vermont and Washington.
Supporters of the federal restrictions said that constitutionally,
federal statutes override state laws.
U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration special agent Richard Meyer,
based in San Francisco, told The Union his department does not alter
its approach to suit state and local laws.
California's Proposition 215 allows medical marijuana to be grown and
possessed, but not sold. Meyer said that although using marijuana is
illegal under federal law, the DEA only actively pursues dealers, not
Stores such as Henry's shop in Colfax are "a blatant violation of the
law," Meyer said.
Last year, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco
ruled the federal law outlawing marijuana should not apply to people
using the drug on a doctor's recommendation. The Bush administration
appealed that decision - which only covers the western states in the
9th Circuit - saying federal anti-drug laws supersede state laws.
"What a waste of money going after these shops," Henry said. "Not one
person in this community has said anything negative (about the store)."
Henry said his store has about 250 active members and that the numbers
grow every month. He said about half of his clients come from Nevada
County. He said he worries about losing the store and facing
prosecution every day, but that he continues on because it is the
right thing to do.
"Yes, there is risk," he said. "But the benefits of helping (clients)
outweighs the risks."
Dear Drugs-Forum readers: We are a small non-profit that runs one of the most read drug information & addiction help websites in the world. We serve over 4 million readers per month, and have costs like all popular websites: servers, hosting, licenses and software. To protect our independence we do not run ads. We take no government funds. We run on donations which average $25. If everyone reading this would donate $5 then this fund raiser would be done in an hour. If Drugs-Forum is useful to you, take one minute to keep it online another year by donating whatever you can today. Donations are currently not sufficient to pay our bills and keep the site up. Your help is most welcome. Thank you.
FEDS SAY POT SHOPS ILLEGAL