1. Dear Drugs-Forum readers: We are a small non-profit that runs one of the most read drug information & addiction help websites in the world. We serve over 4 million readers per month, and have costs like all popular websites: servers, hosting, licenses and software. To protect our independence we do not run ads. We take no government funds. We run on donations which average $25. If everyone reading this would donate $5 then this fund raiser would be done in an hour. If Drugs-Forum is useful to you, take one minute to keep it online another year by donating whatever you can today. Donations are currently not sufficient to pay our bills and keep the site up. Your help is most welcome. Thank you.

Former U.S. attorney McKay backs effort to legalize pot in Washington

  1. CaptainTripps
    A coalition that includes former U.S. Attorney John McKay, Seattle City Attorney Pete Holmes and travel guide Rick Steves is launching an initiative that would legalize marijuana in Washington state.

    The group, led by the American Civil Liberties Union of Washington, decided to push the initiative this spring after Gov. Chris Gregoire vetoed most of a medical-marijuana bill that had passed the state Legislature.

    "We did some more public-opinion research, looked at the numbers and said, 'Yeah, this is the time,' " said Alison Holcomb, campaign manager for the initiative and drug-policy director of the ACLU of Washington.

    The initiative would regulate the recreational use of marijuana in a way similar to how the state regulates alcohol.

    It would legalize marijuana for people older than 21, authorize the state Liquor Control Board to regulate and tax marijuana for sale in "stand-alone stores" and extend drunken-driving laws to marijuana, with blood tests to determine how much of the substance's active ingredient is present in a driver's blood.

    Taxing sales would bring the state $215 million a year, conservatively estimated, Holmes said.

    McKay, who spent five years enforcing federal drug laws as the U.S. attorney in Seattle before he was fired by the Bush administration in early 2007, said he hopes the initiative will help "shame Congress" into ending pot prohibition.

    He said laws criminalizing marijuana are wrongheaded because they create an enormous black market exploited by international cartels and crime rings.
    "That's what drives my concern: The black market fuels the cartels, and that's what allows them to buy the guns they use to kill people," McKay said. "A lot of Americans smoke pot, and they're willing to pay for it. I think prohibition is a dumb policy, and there are a lot of line federal prosecutors who share the view that the policy is suspect."

    Supporters would have until the end of this year to gather more than 240,000 signatures to get the initiative before the Legislature. Lawmakers could approve it or allow it to go to the ballot next year.

    The coalition pushing the initiative is called New Approach Washington. It also includes Dr. Robert W. Wood, former director of the HIV/AIDS Program of Public Health — Seattle and King County, and state Rep. Mary Lou Dickerson, D-Seattle, who this year sponsored an unsuccessful bill to legalize, regulate and tax marijuana. Both McKay and Holmes supported Dickerson's bill.

    While Dickerson's effort failed, separate legislation to license and regulate medical-marijuana dispensaries and grow operations, and give patients broader arrest protection, was approved.

    Gregoire, however, vetoed parts of the bill in late April, saying it would put state workers at risk of prosecution under federal law, which bans marijuana.
    Although the veto wasn't the only factor behind the initiative, that's when members of the coalition began talking more about a measure that would go beyond medical marijuana, the ACLU's Holcomb said.

    "The public opinion is there to support full legalization," she said. "If you're going to put the effort into doing an initiative, it doesn't make sense to limit yourself to medical marijuana."

    New Approach Washington planned a news conference Wednesday to announce the effort.

    No state has legalized marijuana for recreational purposes in such a way, although some have decriminalized it. The initiative would put Washington squarely at odds with federal law.

    It would set limits on how much cannabis people can have: an ounce of dried bud, 16 ounces of marijuana-infused foods in solid form, and 72 ounces of marijuana-infused liquids, or all three, Holcomb said. Limits are necessary to help ensure that people don't buy large amounts for resale in other states, she said.

    Holmes called the measure the "first comprehensive legalization, regulation and taxation initiative. It addresses every concern that has been voiced in the debate over the last several decades."

    California voters last year rejected Proposition 19, which would have allowed for personal possession and growing of limited amounts of marijuana, 54 percent to 46 percent.

    Steves, a longtime critic of the nation's marijuana laws, said he supports the Washington state initiative because "I just care about our community, and I think the war on marijuana is hurting people. ... I think it's flat out good citizenship to address a problem that needs to be tackled in a more thoughtful way."

    McKay said he long has considered marijuana prohibition a failed policy, but that his job as U.S. attorney was to enforce federal law, and he had no problem doing so.
    But now, he said, "I can say the law is stupid."

    McKay added that he does not use marijuana and that his position is based on a belief that marijuana prohibition has failed.
    "When you look at alcohol prohibition, it took the states to say, 'This policy is wrong,' " he said. "This bill might not be perfect, but it's a good step forward. I think it will eventually shame Congress into action."

    Another group, Sensible Washington, already is pushing a legalization initiative that would remove all state criminal and civil penalties for marijuana use, possession and cultivation in any amount. Their effort is an initiative directly to the voters, meaning that, if it qualifies for the November ballot and passes, it would become law without input from the Legislature.

    Originally published June 21, 2011 at 9:28 PM | Page modified June 21, 2011 at 11:11 PM
    The Associated Press and Seattle Times reporters Andrew Garber and Steve Miletich contributed to this report.


  1. CaptainTripps
    Legalize marijuana in Washington state


    [​IMG]The Seattle Times editorial board supports the legalization, regulation and taxation of marijuana for Washington state adults.

    MARIJUANA should be legalized, regulated, taxed and made available for sale to adults. Prohibition has failed. It fuels criminal gangs. It fills the prisons in America and graveyards in Mexico.

    To end marijuana prohibition at the federal level, several states need to defy federal authority. That is how the politics works. The Legislature will not do it, nor will Gov. Chris Gregoire. But the people of Washington can, through a ballot initiative.

    On Wednesday, a group called New Approach Washington filed a statewide ballot initiative that legalizes the growing, processing and sale of marijuana in regulated private stores to adults over 21. It decriminalizes possession of up to 1 ounce of dried smoking material, 16 ounces of cannabis-infused foods and 72 ounces of liquids.

    It is not the first such initiative. Initiative 1149, which is a simple repeal of all marijuana laws for those older than 18, has been collecting signatures. But its backers have little money, too few signatures and are almost out of time.

    The new effort, a more moderate one, has some big names behind it, including Pete Holmes, Seattle city attorney, and John McKay, former U.S. attorney. It is backed by the American Civil Liberties Union of Washington. What's more, the new effort looks as if it will have enough money to collect the 241,000 valid signatures needed by Dec. 31.

    The new effort is an initiative to the Legislature, which gives that body a chance to enact it or put it on the November 2012 ballot, either by itself or with the Legislature's bill. In no case would the governor's signature be needed.

    By passing such a measure, the people would be defying the federal government. They would be inviting their politicians — particularly their two senators, and the governor they elect in 2012 — to stand with them.

    The actual bill they pass might well be struck down by a federal court. The crucial thing is the voters' political statement — here, and in a few other states, perhaps Oregon, California or Colorado.

    That statement — for legalization, regulation and taxation — is one we support.
    Originally published Wednesday, June 22, 2011 at 4:09 PM
To make a comment simply sign up and become a member!