1. Dear Drugs-Forum readers: We are a small non-profit that runs one of the most read drug information & addiction help websites in the world. We serve over 4 million readers per month, and have costs like all popular websites: servers, hosting, licenses and software. To protect our independence we do not run ads. We take no government funds. We run on donations which average $25. If everyone reading this would donate $5 then this fund raiser would be done in an hour. If Drugs-Forum is useful to you, take one minute to keep it online another year by donating whatever you can today. Donations are currently not sufficient to pay our bills and keep the site up. Your help is most welcome. Thank you.
  1. source
    View attachment 27881 The inert gas helium and barbiturate drugs contributed to more deaths last year than ecstasy, cannabis, mephedrone and GHB, official figures show.

    According to Office for National Statistics data released on Wednesday, the number of deaths mentioning barbiturates increased from six in 2007 to 37 in 2011, the highest number since 1996, despite the number of prescriptions for barbiturates more than halving over this period.

    Over the same period, deaths involving helium have risen from two to 42. By comparison there were just seven cannabis-related deaths last year while ecstasy was responsible for 13 deaths. Cocaine claimed the lives of 112 people.

    Almost all of those who died taking barbiturate and helium were recorded as suicides. Helium in particular has seen a steep rise in its use. Between 1993 and 2007 just 18 people died using the gas. The gas has become a feature of both literature and public policy debate in the last 20 years as the row over right-to-die has become more intense.

    Overall, there were 1,772 male and 880 female drug poisoning deaths – involving both legal and illegal drugs – in 2011, a 6% decrease since 2010 for males and a 3% increase for females.

    Over half of all the deaths related to drug poisoning involved opiates. In 2011 heroin or morphine, were involved in 596 deaths.

    However, there has been a fall in deaths involving heroin or another opiate. For men the mortality rate has fallen sharply in the last two years, down from 27.9 deaths per million population in 2009 to 17.1 in 2011. This is a 39% fall and is the lowest rate since 1997.

    The decrease in deaths has many reasons but ONS points to evidence of a "heroin drought" in the UK, "with shortages in the availability of heroin continuing in some areas in 2011-12" with a result that the street purity of opiates sold has dropped.

    Despite fears from drug workers that the low purity levels would lead to overdoses, the reduced supply seems to have led to less demand.

    Results from the British Crime Survey, the ONS says, suggest there was a significant decline in the proportion of 16-to-59-year-olds reporting use of heroin in the last month between 2009-10 and 2010-11. This is backed up by evidence from the NHS's National Treatment Agency for Substance Misuse which said that the number of adults newly entering treatment for heroin and crack use has fallen by 15% in two years.

    "[The data] suggests that this decline is probably due to reduced demand rather than any shortfall in services. These factors may explain the decline in deaths involving heroin/morphine that has been seen over the last couple of years," said the ONS.

    By Randeep Ramesh, Social Affairs Editor, The Guardian. Weds 29th August 2012.


  1. runnerupbeautyqueen
    Why would drug workers think that low purity heroin would lead to overdoses? Wouldn't lower purity mean less overdoses? Do they mean that because people stopped using due to the drought that caused their tolerance dropped so low that now the availability of heroin in any amount is likely more than they can handle? I'm not getting the cause and effect. Is it me or is this just poorly explained?
  2. source
    It is poorly explained, but then that's journalists for you.

    Yeah you are right, that's what their statistics say normally happens after a drought; tolerance has gone down, so when the drought is over and stronger heroin hits the streets again, some users wont realise and unfortunately overdose.
    But these are statistics for 2011, if the drought continued into early 2012 which they state in the article, then those accidental heroin overdoses will not be counted until next years report.
    I also find it interesting how they can come to the conclusion that heroin use has dropped considerably just by looking at 'crime' figures and users entering into treatment.
    Idk, maybe its just me being cynical of any 'statistics' because I was probably included in their 2010 report. I have just never understood how they can look at the amount of crimes committed where heroin is involved and come to a conclusion of how many heroin users there are in this country. Some users do not need to commit crimes to feed their habit, not only that but I'm also betting that a large amount of users that unfortunately need to commit crime are very clever at avoiding being caught.
    Plus, I can't see how the total amount of users entering treatment would help them with this figure either... some users are forced to go into treatment, some go willingly, some are always in and out of rehab and there is a massive proportion of users in this country that have no inclination to even look at a rehab let alone walk through the doors...

To make a comment simply sign up and become a member!