1. Dear Drugs-Forum readers: We are a small non-profit that runs one of the most read drug information & addiction help websites in the world. We serve over 4 million readers per month, and have costs like all popular websites: servers, hosting, licenses and software. To protect our independence we do not run ads. We take no government funds. We run on donations which average $25. If everyone reading this would donate $5 then this fund raiser would be done in an hour. If Drugs-Forum is useful to you, take one minute to keep it online another year by donating whatever you can today. Donations are currently not sufficient to pay our bills and keep the site up. Your help is most welcome. Thank you.
    PLEASE HELP

Herbal Supplements Are Often Not What They Seem

By Potter, Nov 5, 2013 | | |
Rating:
4/5,
  1. Potter
    Americans spend an estimated $5 billion a year on unproven herbal supplements that promise everything from fighting off colds to curbing hot flashes and boosting memory. But now there is a new reason for supplement buyers to beware: DNA tests show that many pills labeled as healing herbs are little more than powdered rice and weeds.


    Using a test called DNA barcoding, a kind of genetic fingerprinting that has also been used to help uncover labeling fraud in the commercial seafood industry, Canadian researchers tested 44 bottles of popular supplements sold by 12 companies. They found that many were not what they claimed to be, and that pills labeled as popular herbs were often diluted — or replaced entirely — by cheap fillers like soybean, wheat and rice.

    Consumer advocates and scientists say the research provides more evidence that the herbal supplement industry is riddled with questionable practices. Industry representatives argue that any problems are not widespread.

    For the study, the researchers selected popular medicinal herbs, and then randomly bought different brands of those products from stores and outlets in Canada and the United States. To avoid singling out any company, they did not disclose any product names.

    Among their findings were bottles of echinacea supplements, used by millions of Americans to prevent and treat colds, that contained ground up bitter weed, Parthenium hysterophorus, an invasive plant found in India and Australia that has been linked to rashes, nausea and flatulence.

    Two bottles labeled as St. John’s wort, which studies have shown may treat mild depression, contained none of the medicinal herb. Instead, the pills in one bottle were made of nothing but rice, and another bottle contained only Alexandrian senna, an Egyptian yellow shrub that is a powerful laxative. Gingko biloba supplements, promoted as memory enhancers, were mixed with fillers and black walnut, a potentially deadly hazard for people with nut allergies.

    Of 44 herbal supplements tested, one-third showed outright substitution, meaning there was no trace of the plant advertised on the bottle — only another plant in its place.

    Many were adulterated with ingredients not listed on the label, like rice, soybean and wheat, which are used as fillers.

    In some cases, these fillers were the only plant detected in the bottle — a health concern for people with allergies or those seeking gluten-free products, said the study’s lead author, Steven G. Newmaster, a biology professor and botanical director of the Biodiversity Institute of Ontario at the University of Guelph.

    The findings, published in the journal BMC Medicine, follow a number of smaller studies conducted in recent years that have suggested a sizable percentage of herbal products are not what they purport to be. But because the latest findings are backed by DNA testing, they offer perhaps the most credible evidence to date of adulteration, contamination and mislabeling in the medicinal supplement industry, a rapidly growing area of alternative medicine that includes an estimated 29,000 herbal products and substances sold throughout North America.

    “This suggests that the problems are widespread and that quality control for many companies, whether through ignorance, incompetence or dishonesty, is unacceptable,” said David Schardt, a senior nutritionist at the Center for Science in the Public Interest, an advocacy group. “Given these results, it’s hard to recommend any herbal supplements to consumers.”

    Representatives of the supplement industry said that while mislabeling of supplements was a legitimate concern, they did not believe it reached the extent suggested by the new research.

    Stefan Gafner, the chief science officer at the American Botanical Council, a nonprofit group that promotes the use of herbal supplements, said the study was flawed, in part because the bar-coding technology it used could not always identify herbs that have been purified and highly processed.

    “Over all, I would agree that quality control is an issue in the herbal industry,” Dr. Gafner said. “But I think that what’s represented here is overblown. I don’t think it’s as bad as it looks according to this study.”

    The Food and Drug Administration has used bar-coding technology to warn and in some cases prosecute sellers of seafood found to be “misbranded.” The DNA technique has also been used in studies of herbal teas, which showed that a significant percentage contain herbs and ingredients that are not listed on their labels.

    But policing the supplement industry is a special challenge. The F.D.A. requires that companies test the products they sell to make sure that they are safe. But the system essentially operates on the honor code. Unlike prescription drugs, supplements are generally considered safe until proved otherwise.

    Under a 1994 law, they can be sold and marketed with little regulatory oversight, and they are pulled from shelves generally only after complaints of serious injury. The F.D.A. audits a small number of companies, but even industry representatives say more oversight is needed.

    “The regulations are very appropriate and rigorous,” said Duffy MacKay of the Council for Responsible Nutrition, a supplement industry trade group. “But we need a strong regulator enforcing the full force of the law. F.D.A. resources are limited, and therefore enforcement has not historically been as rigorous as it could be.”

    Shelly Burgess, a spokeswoman for the F.D.A., said that companies were required to adhere to a set of good manufacturing practices designed to prevent adulteration, but that many were ignoring the rules.

    “Unfortunately, we are seeing a very high percentage — approximately 70 percent — of firms’ noncompliance,” she said, “and we are very active in taking enforcement actions against such violations.”

    DNA bar coding was developed about a decade ago at the University of Guelph. Instead of sequencing entire genomes, scientists realized that they could examine genes from a standardized region of every genome to identify species of plants and animals. These short sequences can be quickly analyzed — much like the bar codes on the items at a supermarket — and compared with others in an electronic database. An electronic reference library at Guelph, called the International Barcode of Life Project, contains over 2.6 million bar code records for almost 200,000 species of plants and animals.

    The testing technique is not foolproof. It can identify the substances in a supplement, but it cannot determine their potency. And because the technology relies on the detection of DNA, it may not be able to identify concentrated chemical extracts that do not contain genetic material, or products in which the material has been destroyed by heat and processing.

    But Dr. Newmaster emphasized that only powders and pills were used in the new research, not extracts. In addition, the DNA testing nearly always detected some plant material in the samples — just not always the plant or herb named on the label.

    Some of the adulteration problems may be inadvertent. Cross-contamination can occur in fields where different plants are grown side by side and picked at the same time, or in factories where the herbs are packaged. Dr. Gafner of the American Botanical Council said that rice, starch and other compounds were sometimes added during processing to keep powdered herbs from clumping, just as kernels of rice are added to salt shakers.

    But that does not explain many of the DNA results. For instance, the study found that one product advertised as black cohosh — a North American plant and popular remedy for hot flashes and other menopause symptoms — actually contained a related Asian plant, Actaea asiatica, that can be toxic to humans.

    Those findings mirror a similar study of black cohosh supplements conducted at Stony Brook University medical center last year. Dr. David A. Baker, a professor of obstetrics, gynecology and reproductive medicine, bought 36 black cohosh supplements from online and chain stores. Bar coding tests showed that a quarter of them were not black cohosh, but instead contained an ornamental plant from China.

    Dr. Baker called the state of supplement regulation “the Wild West,” and said most consumers had no idea how few safeguards were in place. “If you had a child who was sick and three out of 10 penicillin pills were fake, everybody would be up in arms,” Dr. Baker said. “But it’s O.K. to buy a supplement where three out of 10 pills are fake. I don’t understand it. Why does this industry get away with that?”



    http://www.nytimes.com/2013/11/05/s...-what-they-seem.html?partner=rss&emc=rss&_r=0
    (NY times link will be dead in the morning unless you pay)
    By ANAHAD O’CONNOR
    Published: November 3, 2013

    Link to abstract
    http://www.biomedcentral.com/1741-7015/11/222/abstract

Comments

  1. Rob Cypher
    Because they’re not considered to be food or drugs, and are not regulated as such by the FDA, marketers of herbal supplements, like echinacea and St. John’s wort, are able to make all sorts of claims about the pills’ effects that wouldn’t fly for pharmaceuticals.

    Consumers who choose to spend their money on such things are expected to know that they’re investing in a unproven treatment. Some may even call it a placebo. What they’re not expecting to pay for is a capsule stuffed with rice and weeds — yet according to a new study, that’s what many so-called herbal supplements turn out to be.

    The New York Times reports on DNA tests carried out by Canadian researchers on 44 types of popular supplements marketed by 12 different brands. They found that many of the herbs identified on the pills’ labels were diluted with unlisted ingredients. A full third contained no trace of the advertised herb, which had been replaced entirely by cheap fillers. In some cases, the replacements are even tied to adverse health effects:

    “I don’t think it’s as bad as it looks according to this study,” Stefan Gafner, the chief science officer at the American Botanical Council, a nonprofit group that promotes the use of herbal supplements, told the Times. But although the study has several potential flaws, most people interviewed by the Times admitted that the lack of regulation is far from good — and that it’s another reason to be skeptical about the lofty claims made by the $5 billion per year industry.

    Lindsay Abrams
    Salon
    November 4, 2013

    http://www.salon.com/2013/11/04/dna_tests_reveal_many_herbal_supplements_are_fake/
  2. Hey :-)
    This is a lot of money . It is a possible agenda of those that create and produce traditional medicines , to take control/reduce the success of competitors .

    It was pills that were tested . Pills contain fillers .

    Stefan Gafner, the chief science officer at the American Botanical Council, a nonprofit group that promotes the use of herbal supplements, said the study was flawed, in part because the bar-coding technology it used could not always identify herbs that have been purified and highly processed.

    Although Stefan Gafner works in promotion of herbal supplements , if what he says about bar-coding technology is true then studies based on this mean nothing .

    This would also benefit an agenda of reducing confidence and success in herbal products in that consumers may distrust the industry as whole compared to a distrust of one or two particular brands .

    How many bottles ? What levels of Parthenium hysterophorus are required to produce these effects ? Also , there are many many traditional medications with these side effects .

    The sudy may already be flawed .

    In a professional study , would not cross contamination be considered before marketing a mass hysteria campaign ? If this is the case , does this not further point towards an agenda not totally focused on human safety ?

    Again , if the DNA Bar-Coding technology is unable to detect in certain circumstances , these findings mean nothing . These comments are possibly only adding hysteria in a campaign designed to take control .

    The journal BMC Medicine is what and backed by who ? And how is this possibly credible evidence ?

    If The Center for Science in the Public Interest is working with those who would benefit from a reduction in success to the herbal industry then these comments by David Schardt would be biased accordingly .

    This would make sense if this DNA Bar-coding technology fails in some circumstances . This comment is also not sensational , but admitting where areas in the industry could be improved .

    This does not make sense considering that some of the Prozac studies were hiden/lost and it was not until after this drug was being prescribed that fears over suicidal ideation emerged and i believe further data from patients became sort .

    What is meant by ''good manufacturing practices'' . Although this may be designed to prevent adulteration , it does not mean that because of noncompliance adulteration has taken place .

    Important to consider that highlighted in red .

    Is plant matter not a filler ?

    A possible explanation .

    Paracetamol is also toxic at certain levels . The amount of Actaea asiatica may not be toxic at the levels they found and may have been found along with black cohosh . This may be another angle to promote hysteria , maybe amongst a large menapausal market .

    Adding the findings of anther University Center using what could be a moot technology . This may seem to add credibility .

    Sensationalist phrases . Also how could Dr. Baker possibly know that three out of ten pills are fake based on the technology used ?

    My conclusion is that until there is the technology to test specifically and accurately the herbal industries products , sensationalist claims point towards an agenda of control/finance .

    Please excuse if this does not post correctly . I am trying to teach myself how to wrap/tags/quote etc . If it looks dreadful i shall have it removed .

    Hey
  3. berry13
    @Hey, your post was formatted beautifully. I found that you had many of the same thoughts that I did, and you criticized the article as a whole rather than just picking out some pieces. I really think what your wrote would qualify as a great counter-piece to this article, as the logic is not simply on one side of the spectrum but more of a neutral view.
To make a comment simply sign up and become a member!