1. Dear Drugs-Forum readers: We are a small non-profit that runs one of the most read drug information & addiction help websites in the world. We serve over 4 million readers per month, and have costs like all popular websites: servers, hosting, licenses and software. To protect our independence we do not run ads. We take no government funds. We run on donations which average $25. If everyone reading this would donate $5 then this fund raiser would be done in an hour. If Drugs-Forum is useful to you, take one minute to keep it online another year by donating whatever you can today. Donations are currently not sufficient to pay our bills and keep the site up. Your help is most welcome. Thank you.
    PLEASE HELP
  1. Crazy Insane Sanity
    Original post: http://www.drugs-forum.com/forum/showthread.php?t=110966

    To put it simply, our government seems to me to have taken on a rather neo-fascist persona with its radical outlook on drug use, coupled with its inability to trust the public with decisions that affect only themselves as individuals. This "War on Drugs" has become a crusade against innocent people for excersizing their naturally given right to alter their consciousness as they choose and I say it's time we're given back our freedom to think for ourselves!

    When it comes to drug policy, we need to stop outlawing the use of drugs and continue to strike at the heart of the societal problem...focusing on taking out the illegal manufacturers and distributors of potentially harmful substances, and better educating our society on the matter at hand. We need to start avoiding all of these propagandistic scare tactics and meet the issue head on. Use unbiased research studies, with actual results. If there is a problem we shouldn't try to burry it. We should work to understand it, so eventually we can correct the source of the problems at hand (e.g. what psychological processes make adolecent kids so prone to start drug abuse and what measures can be taken to get through to them?). With all the lies we make up about drugs it's no wonder teens don't believe us when we tell them cocaine, opiates, and hallucinogens (amongst, literally, countless other drugs) can destroy their lives if they abuse them. What people don't understand is that these aren't substances that are there to get "fucked up" on. Some of them are, however, drugs that certain people can benefit from if used responsibly, on occasion, as needed.

    I say it's time we be honest and explain to people how these drugs work and affect the mind/body. Give them an understanding of how these drugs create their effects and what the dangers and benefits of those effects are, and with that knowledge they'll know how the drug being used should be used, if at all...and from there people can make an educated decision for themselve on what drugs, if any, they put in their body (like alcohol, a horrible drug when abused...but because it legal, lets indulge...right?). Now that's not to say there doesn't need to be medical practitioners to offer professional, educated advice on treatment, as well as for the legal prescription of medication, but any option would be open for discussion (particularly in certain special cases where experimental measures may be the best option). It would also be easier to conduct professional experiments with volunteers to further our knowledge of neurology and various other branches of physiology, as well as psychology.

    Lets face it, this "War on Drugs" is doing nothing but hindering the progression of our society. Not only are we throwing billions of dollars annually into a counterproductive campaign, but we're arresting hundreds of thousands of people each year who are merely victims of the sickness of addiction, and likely hundreds or even thousands more who are more responsible with their drug intake. We are throwing good, innocent people in jail for using drugs that are only detrimental if abused. And the people who suffer the most from this senseless "zero tolerance" campaign are the people who have abused these drugs and need help getting clean, but are instead thrown in jail or prison with theives, violent murders, and career criminals where they still have access to the very drugs they were locked up for. These addicts have lost control of their lives, and more often than not, feel miserable and just want to quit destroying their livelyhood, but instead of helping these people we're tossing them to the curb as worthless street scum; throwing them in with the shit of society, and almost forcing them to adopt their customs. Now what kind of person do you think they'll be when they get out of prison?

    People wonder why things are so out of control in this country? People have been using mind altering substances since before the dawn of history, now all of a sudden we've made it illegal to use them because our lack of understanding of these drugs frightened us into regulating them, when in reality we should've been studying them to know why they should or shouldn't be taken...figuring out how each substance interacts with the individual components of our bodies, and using that information of the system's altered state to better understand the over-all biological workings of life and consciousness. And now that we've started regulating every mind altering substance possible to the point where a bag of cannabis is a major offense, it's no longer so horrible to commit a crime...after all, it's just so easy to be a criminal these days.

    People start down this road towards drug use and get introduced to career criminals, and recruited as foot soldiers in the market of illegal drug sales due to this "zero tolerance" crusade that classifies harmless people in with real criminals...giving the upper hand to individuals with greater propensities toward violence and anti-social behavior at the expense of those who are more generous and sociable. It just seems a little hypocritical when the War on Drugs is more detrimental than the actual substances being outlawed.

    Tell me, why is it we live in the Land of the Free, yet we don't even have the freedom to decide what we put in our own bodies? I can understand outlawing the illegal production and distribution of drugs that are detrimental to society, but you can't take away the individual citizen's right to live their lives as they choose. It seems to me like nobody understands that people will do what they do, regardless of what the government tells them to do. Therefore, in my world, the laws that the government creates and enforces should only have a negative impact on the people who's actions are detrimental to other people!

    Well that's about all I have for now. Just to make the point clear, I don't want people to think that I abuse drugs, or anything like that. I do not drink, smoke cigarette's, pop pills that are not otherwise prescribed to me, or anything like that. I am not a "druggy", or an abuser of drugs. I simply think that having a government that babysits its society results in a society dependant on regulations. It's like raising kids...if you shelter them from the world for too long, they'll grow up to have a incomplete understanding of social norms, often resulting in a distorted view of the inner workings of the world and life itself. In other words, society has to make mistakes before it can learn from them....just like people.

    Now finally, allow me to end this blog with some of my favorite related quotes...

    "Those that can give up essential liberty to obtain a temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
    ~Benjamin Franklin

    "It will be found an unjust and unwise jealousy to deprive a man of his natural liberty upon the supposition he may abuse it."
    ~George Washington

    "The War on Drugs imposes economic costs on large numbers of non-drug-abusing people in a failed attempt to save a relatively small group of hard-core drug abusers from themselves. It's absurd to force some people to bear costs so that others might be prevented from choosing to do harm to themselves."
    ~ James Ostrowski

Comments

  1. no-go
    People who do drugs are going to get them regardless of the law. non-indicated use and even abuse, regularly, habitually, is possible under compliance with law. the government is really not interfering with the majority of users. Fx, swim's prescription is generally not used as directed, and swim remains undeterred and unburdened by crazy notions like government "social control", moral policing, legislatively nominal personal liberty violations, an "opressing society", and so on. Swim does just fine. Neither drug wars nor moral attitudes attributed to drug law affect swim. So why care? I don't have to change someone else's opinion on drugs in order for swim to do them. Does swiy?

    But I think you have the wrong idea about the government and its restrictions of drug use. I think it has legitimate place in society, drugs. I think regulation does too. You just have to be objective; stop feeling victimized when you're probably not, and try to see from their perspective why they think it benefits the people to regulate drug use. If you can be honest and charitable enough, you might see there's good reasons to control substances.

    Here is a summary of why i'm ok with drug laws. Swim abuses his rx. He uses it for off-label therapy, self-medicated. It's safer than others rx, but yea, swim does do runs more often than not. But he's learned how to handle it. Swim does not think this practice should be widespread. most people here are more fucked up from use than anything. open any thread and someone is trying to quit a drug, paranoid about what harm they've caused themselves, asking how to abuse and abusing improperly, damaging relationships, damaging their personal livelihood, and so on. Very few of us can continue our habits in the long term and be healthy, sane and functional, and that takes time and dedication, psychotic episodes, and a lot of close calls and intervention-worthy episodes. We are special that we can do what we do. imagine the rest of the country having open access to what we do. think they'll handle it? I doubt it. The laws definitely limit people's exposure to things which have powerful potential to ruin lives, and that's a good thing...
  2. Crazy Insane Sanity
    And what about the innocent people who have had their lives completely ruined for exersizing their freedom to alter their consciousness (including the ones who do so responsibly...without abuse)? You're not the only person in this world, and just because your life hasn't been affected negatively, doesn't mean other people's haven't. And who said I'm not victimized? I was arrested and charged with possession of marijuana...how is it fair that my life is put under burden when I've done nothing to hinder society? In fact I've made it a strong point in my life to help the progression of society, and I'm being punished for exercizing my freedom?

    While I completely understand the government's fear of drugs, that's no reason to trample people's rights. The answer isn't dictation of people's lives...this is not freedom! the answer lies in education, and legalized regulation. Like for example, they could implement a drug license, where to take a particular drug, you would have to become educated on that substance. You would have to understand the risks involved with it...they could even regulate how much you get, but the choice to take the substance would be yours. If you abuse your freedom, and put others at risk...well then the license is revoked.

    I'll admit that drug licensing isn't a full proof plan. People will find ways around it, but they do anyway.

    I recall reading an article in High Times a while back. It talked about a good man, with a college education, a good paying job, and a daughter. This man was never arrested for anything other than possession of marijuana, and always payed his child support on time. This individual got arrested for having an ounce of marijuana, and because it was his second offense (that's right...only second), he was thrown in prison for years (I think 3). Now, because of a stupid law, society has lost a good, educated, man; a business has lost a good worker; a daughter has lost a father; and a mother has lost child support. This is just one instance of many.

    Lets take this argument to an evolutionary point of view. Lets assume drugs ruin lives (which most of them are capable of doing). People who are more susceptible to addiction are then at a disadvantage when it comes to using drugs. These individuals can either take no interest in drugs, or can do drugs, and ruin their life, there-by making them less likely to find a mate and successfully reproduce. Regardless, that individual either has an decreased curiosity about drugs, and that gene will be passed on to their offspring (assuming its biological...and it probably is, looking at the statistics), or they'll have an increased ability not to reproduce and won't have offspring. On the other hand, an individual who is capable of using drugs without destroying their life (resistance to addiction...like Swim, who has an uncanny ability to withstand addiction), will pass on that resistance to their offspring. Therefor, I propose that the War on Drugs is hindering the evolutionary progression of humanity! (I know...this is stretching a bit :))

    One thing really bothers me about your comment though...I have to stop feeling victimized when I'm probably not? How do you know I'm not needlessly victimized, when so many people are? How is it that it's ok for some people to be wrongfully victimized? This is not freedom! Who are you to decide that some people, who have done nothing wrong to society, should be punished? Who cares if some people choose to use their freedom to destroy their lives...that's their choice, and so long as they aren't partaking in actions that are harmful to others, they should have the freedom to live their life as they choose...at least this is the belief of America's founding fathers, and I think they had a great idea; unfortunately America has come a long way since it was founded, and America's impact on the rest of the world has been significant to say the least.
  3. g666d
    Agree very much, good thoughts. But swim is of the opinion everything should be legal, unregulated, just no advertising on psychoactives. And credible information freely available.
    Another thing to think about... the amount of cops, politicians, lawyers, judges who regularly partake in illegal substances for recreational use, alcohol is hypocritical enough but these laws are broken by all manner of people.
  4. bluntshell
To make a comment simply sign up and become a member!