1. Dear Drugs-Forum readers: We are a small non-profit that runs one of the most read drug information & addiction help websites in the world. We serve over 4 million readers per month, and have costs like all popular websites: servers, hosting, licenses and software. To protect our independence we do not run ads. We take no government funds. We run on donations which average $25. If everyone reading this would donate $5 then this fund raiser would be done in an hour. If Drugs-Forum is useful to you, take one minute to keep it online another year by donating whatever you can today. Donations are currently not sufficient to pay our bills and keep the site up. Your help is most welcome. Thank you.
    PLEASE HELP
  1. Alfa
    WELCOME FIRST MOVE ON GANJA

    The parliamentary committee that was given the job of reviewing the report
    of the National Commission on Ganja has recommended the acceptance of its
    proposal that the personal use of small amounts of marijuana be decriminalised.

    This matter will now go the full House for debate and most likely a
    conscience vote before there is any amendment to the Dangerous Drugs Act,
    to reflect this change.

    We suspect, though, that the recommendation, having been carried by the
    joint select committee, will find an easier passage in the House, although
    this is by no means certain in a situation where the party whips are not
    called on to impose voting discipline. We nonetheless sense that the mood
    in Jamaica is tolerant towards the proposed change.

    In this regard we expect that amendments to reflect the changes in the law
    will come to the House early in the new session, which starts in April.

    The recommendation of the parliamentary committee, in the context of what
    is happening in several other countries, especially in Europe, may not
    appear substantial. But in the circumstance of Jamaica it is a big move to
    have got from there to here, for which the parliamentary committee deserves
    commendation.

    For there were, and are, many who warned against this limited measure of
    removing the use of small amounts of ganja in private as a criminal
    offence. For some the issue is moral, but we suspect that for most the
    greater concern is for the possibility of international repercussions,
    especially from the United States, if it is perceived that Jamaica has
    "gone soft" on drugs.

    The fact, though, is that to maintain the laws on ganja use as they
    currently are, would be to keep legislation out of step with popular
    sentiment and the society's instinct for justice and fair play.

    The point is that Jamaicans, of all social classes, hardly view marijuana
    as a "drug" in the way they perceive cocaine or some other narcotic. Small
    amounts of ganja are culturally acceptable, although most people would, if
    not morally outraged, would be questioning of the commercial production and
    export of the drug, especially if such action had the potential to hurt
    Jamaica.

    The proposed change in the legislation will, hopefully, address a real
    imbalance in the application of the law in Jamaica. It is mainly the poor
    and urban youth who are subject to prosecution and penalties in the legal
    system for the use of ganja. It is they, who mostly gain criminal records.

    The police are more likely to be lenient towards middle class youth who, in
    any event, are more likely to use drugs in the privacy of their homes and
    beyond the eyes of the law.

    Which, of course, raises two important issues with regard to the proposed
    amendment to the ganja law.

    The first of these has to do with the definition of "small quantities" of
    ganja for people's private and personal use. There has to be consistency in
    the application of the law, or you could have the police harassing someone
    with perhaps a pack of ganja cigarettes as opposed to a single spliff.

    The matter will have to do with defining smoking in private. The truth is
    that if this is not carefully handled it could end up victimising the
    existing victims. Many poor urban youth hardly consider hanging on the
    street corner in their communities as being an overly public endeavour.
    Indeed, given the living conditions of many, being on the street is
    important social space. To put in bluntly, there is hardly anything private
    and personal about the tenement or a shack on the gully bank.

    These issues, therefore, have to be seriously considered and dealt with
    creatively.

Comments

To make a comment simply sign up and become a member!