Joe Biden goes soft on drugs

By Heretic.Ape. · Jul 3, 2007 · ·
  1. Heretic.Ape.
    Joe Biden Goes Soft on Drugs

    Jacob Sullum | July 2, 2007, 9:13am
    In a press release that does not seem to be available online, the American Civil Liberties Union praises Sen. Joseph Biden (D-Del.), historically one of the most gung-ho drug warriors in the Democratic Party, for introducing a bill that would eliminate the sentencing disparity between crack and cocaine powder. Previous proposals would have merely reduced the disparity, in some cases by making cocaine powder sentences more severe. By contrast, Biden's bill would raises the amount of crack that triggers a five-year mandatory minimum sentence to 500 grams, the same as the amount for cocaine powder. Biden announced his plan last week:
    The current sentencing disparity between the two forms of cocaine is based on false notions and old logic. The bottom line is that there is no scientific justification for any disparity. Crack and powder are simply two forms of the same drug, and each form produces identical effects. I will soon be introducing legislation that eliminates the sentencing disparity completely, fixing this injustice once and for all.

    Share This Article


  1. radiometer
    Heavy time for Drug Lightweights

    Heavy Time for Drug Lightweights

    By Debra Beste
    Jul 10, 2007


    When Congress passed the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1986, it wrongly included language that meted out a mandatory minimum sentence of five years for dealing 5 grams of crack cocaine, yet the same five-year mandatory minimum sentence for dealing 100 times that amount, or 500 grams, of powder cocaine. Thus the bill codified a racially unjust divide. The U.S. Sentencing Commission found that in 2000 some 84.7 percent of federal crack offenders were black, while only 5.6 percent were white.

    Everyone in Washington knows that the law is unfair -- obscenely unfair. The U.S. Sentencing Commission has made four recommendations to curb the sentencing inequity. Alas, for the past two decades, Democrats and Republicans have cravenly set out to out-posture each other in toughness in the war on drugs. So Washington either voted against or ignored the Sentencing Commission's recommendations.

    Sen. Joe Biden, D-Del., may be about to change the status quo. For the past couple of years, Washington's idea of reform has been to fiddle with the concept of reducing the 100-to-one crack-powder sentencing disparity to 20-to-one.

    Last month, Biden made the brave leap of proposing a bill to eliminate the sentencing disparity completely -- instead of changing the law so it is unfair, but less so. As Biden wrote in a statement announcing his Drug Sentencing Reform and Cocaine Kingpin Trafficking Act of 2007, the law needs to be changed because "powder cocaine offenders who traffic 500 grams of powder (2,500-5,000 doses) receive the same five-year mandatory minimum sentence as crack cocaine offenders who posses just 5 grams of crack (10-50 doses)."

    Biden's bill would raise the amount of crack cocaine so that 500 grams of either crack or powder cocaine would trigger the same mandatory minimum sentence.

    Biden also included the Sentencing Commission recommendation to eliminate the mandatory minimum sentence for simple possession of 5 grams or more of crack, as crack is the only drug to mandate a prison sentence for possession alone. While supporters might argue that the possession penalty is tough on drugs, the Sentencing Commission pointed out how weak the crack possession penalty actually is: "an offender who simply possesses 5 grams of crack cocaine receives the same 5-year mandatory minimum penalty as a trafficker of other drugs."

    The ACLU is supportive. A statement lauded Biden's bill as a "long-awaited fix to discriminatory federal drug sentencing."

    But Eric Sterling of the Criminal Justice Policy Foundation is less enthusiastic. "Most of my friends are a little embarrassed that I'm not jumping up and down with them saying, 'This is what we've been working for.'"

    While Sterling would like to see the 100-to-one discrepancy end, he believes that Washington needs to overhaul drug laws so that they concentrate on kingpins, not low-level offenders. "There shouldn't be any crack cases in federal court, as a general matter," Sterling argued, "because crack is a purely retail phenomenon. The trafficking is in powder cocaine."

    The irony is that most Americans think that federal mandatory minimum sentences -- with extra harsh penalties for crack dealers -- are tough on drug lords, when in fact, the systems goes easy on kingpins.

    Sterling directed me to a Sentencing Commission fact table on 2006 federal cocaine cases. The median crack offense involved 51 grams of the drug -- or 100 to 500 doses. The median powder cocaine offender weight was 6,000 grams, about the amount of cocaine that would fill a briefcase. Not exactly your major haul. Not only do these weights suggest that most federal offenders were not kingpins, but worse, the statistics also show that more than half of federal cocaine cases were crack cases -- dealing with as little as 2.3 grams. One-third of crack cases involved 25 grams or less.

    Drug kingpins should love the status quo.

    Passage of the Biden bill would present a welcome change in disparity-heavy drug laws. The goal should be laws with heavy consequences for drug-trade heavyweights, instead of hefty sentences for lightweights.
To make a comment simply sign up and become a member!