1. Dear Drugs-Forum readers: We are a small non-profit that runs one of the most read drug information & addiction help websites in the world. We serve over 4 million readers per month, and have costs like all popular websites: servers, hosting, licenses and software. To protect our independence we do not run ads. We take no government funds. We run on donations which average $25. If everyone reading this would donate $5 then this fund raiser would be done in an hour. If Drugs-Forum is useful to you, take one minute to keep it online another year by donating whatever you can today. Donations are currently not sufficient to pay our bills and keep the site up. Your help is most welcome. Thank you.

Jury acquits man who forgot mushrooms were in his backpack

By jon-q, Jul 17, 2011 | Updated: Jul 17, 2011 | |
  1. jon-q
    A San Francisco jury found a man accused of possessing magic mushrooms not guilty Friday after his lawyer argued that he forgot they were in his backpack, so he could not have knowingly possessed them.

    Eric Meoli was stopped at the Powell Street BART station May 25 for riding his bicycle on the platform. After handing his backpack over to police to search for identification, the cops found less than four grams of mushrooms in a small internal pocket of the bag, according to the Public Defender’s Office.

    Meoli, a cannabis club worker, had given $10 of legally-obtained medical marijuana to “a hippy in Golden Gate Park” suffering from insomnia, said Deputy Public Defender Kimberly Lutes-Koths. The hippy then gave Meoli the mushrooms. He had put the mushrooms in the backpack about six months after getting them and forgot all about them, Lutes-Koths said.

    “One of the elements of the law requires that the defendant know of the presence of the substance,” said Lutes-Koths. Prosecutors couldn’t prove Meoli had knowledge of possession of the mushrooms when he was arrested, she said.

    The jury acquitted Meoli of one misdemeanor count of possession of psilocybin mushrooms.

    Lutes-Koths said the jury determined that it was just as likely that he forgot the mushrooms were there as it was that he knew they were there, said Lutes-Koths. A jury is given the instruction that says if circumstantial evidence leads to two different conclusions, one that points to guilt and one that points to innocence, the jury must adopt the one that points to innocence, she explained.

    “Some people think my argument was unique, but it just seemed logical to me,” said Lutes-Koths.

    The District Attorney’s Office was not immediately available for comment.

    Margaret Baum
    The SF Examiner 15th July 2011


To make a comment simply sign up and become a member!