1. Dear Drugs-Forum readers: We are a small non-profit that runs one of the most read drug information & addiction help websites in the world. We serve over 4 million readers per month, and have costs like all popular websites: servers, hosting, licenses and software. To protect our independence we do not run ads. We take no government funds. We run on donations which average $25. If everyone reading this would donate $5 then this fund raiser would be done in an hour. If Drugs-Forum is useful to you, take one minute to keep it online another year by donating whatever you can today. Donations are currently not sufficient to pay our bills and keep the site up. Your help is most welcome. Thank you.
    PLEASE HELP

Ken Clarke: UK plainly losing war on drugs

By source, Jul 3, 2012 | | |
  1. source
    _61334505_61333313.jpg
    [Ken Clarke says the illegality of drug taking acts as a deterrent for young people]


    Justice Secretary Ken Clarke has told MPs that the UK is "plainly losing" the war on drugs.
    He said those working to reduce addiction were "disappointed" by a lack of progress over the last 30 years.

    However, government departments were working together better than ever before to fight the problem, he added.
    Mr Clarke told the Commons Home Affairs Committee that he was not convinced by arguments for decriminalising drugs.

    The committee is compiling a report on drugs use in the UK, focusing on the effectiveness or otherwise on the government's strategy, published in 2010.

    'Going backwards'
    Mr Clarke, who served as home secretary, education secretary, health secretary and chancellor in the Conservative governments of the 1980s and 1990s, said: "I've not reached a stage of that blinding insight about exactly how we're going to improve our record, is the honest truth.
    "We've engaged in a war against drugs for 30 years. We're plainly losing it. We have not achieved very much progress.
    "The same problems come round and round but I do not despair. We keep trying every method we can to get on top of one of the worst social problems in the country and the single biggest cause of crime."
    Mr Clarke said: "What has improved is the co-ordination between departments. I was once given the thankless task of co-ordinating the government's whole approach to drugs, pulling together the work of the different departments in the late 1980s.
    "It was a complete waste of time. I did not have sufficient seniority in the government to get anybody to take the faintest notice of me."

    In January, the entrepreneur and campaigner Sir Richard Branson told the committee that abuse of illegal substances should be treated as a health issue, while only suppliers should be the people facing tough penalties.
    But Mr Clarke said: "The government has no intention whatever of changing the criminal law on drugs."

    'Learning from the past'
    Asked about his personal opinions on tackling drug abuse, he added: "I have never been persuaded by the decriminalisation arguments. I've frankly conceded that policy has not been working. We are disappointed by the fact that, apart from making progress, it can be argued we are going backwards at times.
    "My purely personal view is I'd be worried about losing the deterrent effect of criminalisation on youngsters who start experimenting. The really key thing is to work out what can get fewer young people to start experimenting with drugs...

    "One thing that does put them off is they could get into trouble with the police if they do it. Once you tell them they won't get into trouble, I've always felt that more of them would experiment."

    Following Mr Clarke's comments, a Home Office spokesman said: "Confronting the enormous harm caused by drugs is a difficult and global problem.
    "As the Justice Secretary said, we need to learn from the mistakes of the past which is why all branches of government are now working together to tackle this threat at every level.
    "This means challenging and supporting individuals to free themselves from drug dependency, tough punishments for dealers and better international cooperation against organised criminal gangs."


    BBC News - 3rd July 2012 Last updated at 16:48

    Article can be found here

Comments

  1. Mind_Expansion
    "My purely personal view is I'd be worried about losing the deterrent effect of criminalisation on youngsters who start experimenting. The really key thing is to work out what can get fewer young people to start experimenting with drugs..."

    Well his 'purely personal view' appears to be a little skewed if he honestly thinks that criminalization acts as a deterrent to young people who want to take drugs...

    Thanks for sharing this.
  2. source
    There is still a lot of work to do in educating young people about drugs and especially the dangers. It seems that education has always been about the do's and do not's, whats right and wrong, which in my opinion has nothing to do with 'education'. Children should be taught more about culture and society; its not all about facts and figures. So many children are subjected to peer pressure, or grow up in poor communities: school / education does not teach children how to deal with these things.
    When I was younger I had to figure all that shit out myself and ultimately got most of it wrong; I'm not saying that my education was the root cause of all my addictions, far from it, but it 'was' a factor. The fact of not knowing wanted me to find out.

    Quote: "One thing that does put them off is they could get into trouble with the police if they do it. Once you tell them they won't get into trouble, I've always felt that more of them would experiment."

    That is definitely up for arguement. Don't most young and naive kids try drugs 'because' they are illegal? I thought it was always 'cool' in my teens to do something I shouldn't be doing. Regulation of certain substances and better education has got to be a better option; decriminalising will help bring a lot of the issues to the surface instead of underground, surely it's better to treat something you can see than to try and treat something that you cannot??

    Gotta love Britain though: ""I've not reached a stage of that blinding insight about exactly how we're going to improve our record, is the honest truth." Don't worry Ken, still early days...
  3. Baba Blacksheep
    I have held respect for Ken Clarke but this is not a good sign of informed intelligence, this is the continued support of needlessly criminalising a large portion of society. He of all people should understand that the unecessary division of society which is greater than when he was last home secetary is contrived and he is just toeing the party line.
    It is clear that decriminalising some drugs does not drastically raise consumption although it may seem that way as it is out in the open rather than hidden.
    These are unwise words and frankly I would have expected more of him.
    I wonder if he is just plain terrified of encouraging controversial policy change?
  4. source
    Who knows what these politicians are up to. There is always a reason behind news stories like this, for personal gain or not.. unless they have been leaked from voicemail messages that is!
    Politics, schmolitics...
To make a comment simply sign up and become a member!