1. Dear Drugs-Forum readers: We are a small non-profit that runs one of the most read drug information & addiction help websites in the world. We serve over 4 million readers per month, and have costs like all popular websites: servers, hosting, licenses and software. To protect our independence we do not run ads. We take no government funds. We run on donations which average $25. If everyone reading this would donate $5 then this fund raiser would be done in an hour. If Drugs-Forum is useful to you, take one minute to keep it online another year by donating whatever you can today. Donations are currently not sufficient to pay our bills and keep the site up. Your help is most welcome. Thank you.

Legal Highs 'Deadlier Than Cocaine', Experts Warn

By Rob Cypher, Aug 17, 2014 | Updated: Aug 17, 2014 | | |
  1. Rob Cypher
    Legal highs are becoming deadlier than heroin, addiction experts have warned.

    According to a new report by the Centre for Social Justice (CSJ) due to be released this week, deaths linked to new psychoactive substances (NPS), which are legal, could overtake heroin-linked fatalities within two years.

    The CSJ's findings reveal that drugs such as AMT and Burst were linked to 97 deaths in 2012, with hospital admissions rising by 56% between 2009 and 2012.

    The thinktank predicts that based on current trends, deaths related to legal highs could rise to around 400 deaths by 2016.

    The designer drug meow meow was banned in the UK and categorised as a Class B drug in 2010, but other substances such as alpha-methyltryptamine are still legal and newer drugs continue to enter the market.

    The CSJ will brand the government's drug prevention programme FRANK as "shamefully inadequate", and will call on leaders to ban the estimated 250 "head shops" that openly sell the drug.

    UK drug policy 'shameful'

    The CSJ report will also call for a range of new measures to help tackle drug and alcohol addiction, including a "treatment tax" of 1p per unit of alcohol sold at off licences.

    The estimated £1.1bn raised over five years would pay for a network of rehabilitation centres to treat some of the 300,000 people who are addicted to opiates and crack cocaine, and the 1.6m who are alcoholics.

    "Taking the last year increase for NPS and decrease in heroin and projecting forward, the category NPS-related deaths will surpass those of heroin at some point in 2016 at approximately 400-related deaths," the report says.

    Christian Guy, director of the CSJ, commented: "Addiction rips into families, makes communities less safe and entrenches poverty.

    "For years full recovery has been the preserve of the wealthy – closed off to the poorest people and to those with problems who need to rely on a public system. We want to break this injustice wide open."

    According to reports from coroners, almost 100 deaths were linked to NPS in 2012 – up from just 12 in 2009.

    A study released earlier this year by the medical school St George's, University of London, found that the prevalence of legal drugs in post-mortem examination toxicology tests increased from 10 deaths in 2009 to 97 in 2012.

    Aaron Akinyemi
    International Business Times
    August 17, 2014



  1. Alfa
    This seems very illogical to me. I would be interested to know what others think about this.
    NPS (New Psychotropic Substances) can not be seen as a stable group of drugs and therefore can hardly be measured as an entity. Case in point is AMT.
    AMT is not a New Psychotropic Substance by any measure and has proven to be very deadly well over a decade ago. The dangers of AMT are extreme compared to actual New Psychoactive Substances. As mentioned in the article AMT is responsible for most of the fatalities. Including this ancient drug in the NPS group skews the results.
    If a science based drug policy would have been in place then the UK would have banned AMT years ago and these fatalities had not taken place. I would even go as far as concluding that the UK government has some responsibility to bear over these fatalities.
    And this illustrates my point about NPS: new drugs are banned and replaced by newer drugs. So the NPS group is fluid. The next wave of new psychoactive substances may be extremely dangerous or it may be relatively harmless. So it makes no sense to extrapolate how many fatalities it will cause in 2016.
  2. profesor
    I'm not sure if they are specifically referring to tryptamines here, but many of the older legal highs were in the chemical classes of "substituted cathinones" and "substituted amphetamines".
    It turns out the depression medication I've been taking for years with a pretty good safety record, bupropion, is BOTH a substituted cathinone and a substituted amphetamine! It would probably be classified as a Schedule I drug in the U.S. if it were not already a well-marketed medication that has been sold by pharmaceutical companies for years as Wellbutrin.
    It is nearly impossible to get funding to study Schedule I drugs. So that is the kiss of death for legitimate research into these chemicals. I'm not sure what Classifications A and B do in the UK, but I'm afraid that there are miracle medications being smothered in red tape because of drug hysteria.
To make a comment simply sign up and become a member!