1. Dear Drugs-Forum readers: We are a small non-profit that runs one of the most read drug information & addiction help websites in the world. We serve over 4 million readers per month, and have costs like all popular websites: servers, hosting, licenses and software. To protect our independence we do not run ads. We take no government funds. We run on donations which average $25. If everyone reading this would donate $5 then this fund raiser would be done in an hour. If Drugs-Forum is useful to you, take one minute to keep it online another year by donating whatever you can today. Donations are currently not sufficient to pay our bills and keep the site up. Your help is most welcome. Thank you.
    PLEASE HELP
  1. chillinwill
    The Court of Criminal Appeal revoked a judgement by the Court of Magistrates which found a man guilty of importing the drug khat, which had not been illegal at the time of alleged offence.

    Khalif Id Ahmed was found guilty on 8 May, 2009, and sentenced to a six-month jail term and €466 fine for importing the drugs cathine and cathinone, in the form of khat, which are leaves that can be chewed for their euphoric effect.

    Khat is a plant native to East Africa and the Arabian peninsula, and is said to cause excitement, loss of appetite and euphoria. It is a controlled/illegal substance in many countries.

    While cathine and cathinone are illegal substances in themselves, khat leaves were not illegal to import at the time of the offence, which took place in 2006.

    Ahmed was stopped at Malta International Airport on the night between the 21 and 22 July, 2006 upon his arrival by air from Amsterdam. He was carrying a quantity of khat plants. In his statement to the Police he admitted that he had brought the plants into Malta to put it in his fridge and take it for himself and part of it was to give as a present to his Somali friends living in the Marsa Open Centre.

    He stated that only Somalis eat Khat and that he had been given the Khat by his relative Nur Mohammed in Holland and he did not know that it was prohibited in Malta. Had he known that it was illegal, Ahmed had told police, he would not have have brought it to Malta but left it in Holland.

    But Judge Joe Galea Debono asked whether the authorities might want to consider whether an amendment to Malta’s drug laws is warranted at to prohibit the use of this practice by Somali immigrants into this country who share similar customs and habits.
    He referred his court judgement to the ministers of social policy and home affairs.
    The case was similar to the Khayre case, who spent two years in custody over the importation of khat, when it was not even illegal.

    He was finally liberated on appeal on appeal by Chief Justice Vincent De Gaetano.

    In the Khayre case, De Gaetano found that there was no evidence to suggest that appellant Aweys Maani Khayre’s mind was in any way specifically directed to the drug cathinone or to the drug cathine. The Court was satisfied that, in line with the social and cultural habits of his country of origin, he simply intended to provide his friends in Malta with a plant to chew, even if that plant would have, as he must certainly have known that it would have, a stimulating effect on whoever consumed it.

    For these reasons the Court had allowed the appeal, revoked the judgment of the Court of Magistrates and acquitted Khayre of all the charges preferred against him.

    Likewise, Galea Debono said there was no evidence to suggest that Khalif Id Ahmed intended to import into Malta the drugs cathine and cathinone as such, but that, in line with the social customs of his country of origin, he intended to provide himself and his co-nationals in Malta with a plant to chew.

    Matthew Vella
    July 15, 2009
    Malta Today
    http://www.maltatoday.com.mt/2009/07/15/t7.html

Comments

  1. chillinwill
    Appeals determine khat use remains legal

    In 2 similar cases, the Court of Appeal determined that, contrary to previous rulings, possession of the khat plant, whose leaves are chewed for a mild stimulant effect, remains legal in Malta, although it advised the authorities to look into the matter.
    [IMGR="white"]http://www.drugs-forum.com/forum/attachment.php?attachmentid=9796&stc=1&d=1248088299[/IMGR]
    The cases concern two 32-year-old men: Khalif Id Ahmed, a Somali national, and Aweys Maani Khayre, a British national of Somali origin. Both were arrested at the Malta International Airport after khat was found in their suitcase. Mr Ahmed was arrested on July 22, 2006, upon his arrival from Amsterdam, while Mr Khayre was arrested on May 11, 2008 after arriving from London. The men carried 11.8kg and 20.9kg of khat respectively, and both said that they intended to share the leaves with their Somali friends in Malta.

    Both men were charged with aggravated possession, importation and trafficking of cathine and cathinone – the scheduled stimulant substances the plant contains – and were given the lightest sentence possible: a 6-month jail term, a €466 fine and court expert fees. The plant itself is not scheduled, and its use is legal in both the UK and the Netherlands, among other countries, although it is illegal or controlled in many others.

    The 2 men appealed their sentence.

    Mr Ahmed, who originally reached Malta after fleeing his homeland, stated that the use of khat is common in Somalia, and that the word itself is Somali for “salad”.

    The plant has been used in religious and recreational contexts for millennia in the Horn of Africa, Yemen and nearby regions. Its use predates that of coffee – which also originated in the region – and it is used in similar social contexts.

    Both men’s appeals were based on whether they could be charged over the possession of scheduled substances contained in a plant which is unscheduled. The Court noted that in the case of cannabis, among others, the Dangerous Drugs Ordinance expressly mentions the plant itself as well as its derivatives in a synthetic state.

    Therefore, in similar rulings, Chief Justice Vincent de Gaetano (who presided over Mr Khayre’s appeal) and Mr Justice Joseph Galea Debono determined that the men could not be arraigned over the possession, importation and trafficking of cathine and cathinone, and acquitted them of both charges.

    In his ruling, however, Mr Justice Galea Debono said that the authorities might want to consider whether an amendment to Maltese law was warranted “to prohibit use of this practice by the ever-growing number of Somali immigrants into this country who share similar customs and habits as the appellant in the present case”.

    He ordered that copies of his judgment be brought to the attention of Social Policy Minister John Dalli and Justice Minister Carmelo Mifsud Bonnici.

    by John Paul Cordina
    July 14, 2009
    Di-ve
    http://www.di-ve.com/Default.aspx?ID=72&Action=1&NewsId=62278&newscategory=34
To make a comment simply sign up and become a member!