1. Dear Drugs-Forum readers: We are a small non-profit that runs one of the most read drug information & addiction help websites in the world. We serve over 4 million readers per month, and have costs like all popular websites: servers, hosting, licenses and software. To protect our independence we do not run ads. We take no government funds. We run on donations which average $25. If everyone reading this would donate $5 then this fund raiser would be done in an hour. If Drugs-Forum is useful to you, take one minute to keep it online another year by donating whatever you can today. Donations are currently not sufficient to pay our bills and keep the site up. Your help is most welcome. Thank you.
    PLEASE HELP
  1. Terrapinzflyer
    'We already know the mafia is here'

    Medical marijuana lobbyists vigorously plied their trade Monday in a furious attempt to stop an amendment to HB 1043, the medical marijuana “clean-up” bill, that struck language allowing for the creation of investment funds that proponents hoped would fund a restructuring of the industry. The amendment passed and the funds will not be allowed.

    Legislation sponsored by Representative Tom Massey, R-Poncha Springs, and spearheaded by Josh Stanley and the Medical Marijuana Industry Group, could have changed the overall funding structure of the industry in Colorado by allowing individuals to enter into investment funds that would invest in the marijuana trade.

    Stanley told the Colorado Independent the passage of Colorado Springs Republican Rep. Mark Barker’s amendment stripping the investment fund from the bill made those voting for it responsible for the racketeering already occurring in the state.

    “Racketeering is happening now,” Stanley said. “They say we don’t want money coming in from out of state–tough shit– money is coming in from out of state, but it is coming in black bags–cash–at 35 percent interest. We already know the mafia is here and they don’t want your 35 percent; they want your business. What I don’t understand is that we put this together for law enforcement. Would you rather know exactly where the money is coming from? Class A investors undergoing criminal background checks, or would you rather (have to) guess … what type of money is coming in to this business and who actually owns this business. ”

    Massey’s version of the bill would have allowed individuals to place money in investment funds controlled by fund managers who then could decide whether to invest in research and development, dispensaries or grow centers. Individuals could not take part in the fund unless they passed criminal background checks, did not already hold positions in two other similar funds, and passed a series of other requirements.

    While Massey said the Colorado Department of Revenue had signed off on the legislation as a better way to keep track of money coming in and out of the industry, most legislators said it also violated federal RICO (Racketeer and Corrupt Organizations Act) laws among other federal provisions.

    “While I get why people would like this to happen, as a matter of public policy, it seems pretty clear to me that something this legislature ought not be doing is passing laws that basically authorize our state’s departments and agencies to become co-conspirators in a violation of (RICO),” Rep. Bob Gardner, R-Colorado Springs, said.

    Barker said he brought his amendment because of the potential that Colorado organized crime laws, IRS codes, and interstate commerce laws all would be violated with the introduction of medical marijuana investment funds.

    “My biggest problem is that we are not only putting our state agencies, but our citizens, at risk of violating federal law,” Barker said. “I think this puts us all at risk.”

    The bill, with amendments offered by Massey, would have allowed fund managers to infuse cash into various portions of the industry in an attempt to develop a more streamlined distribution system that relied on centralized grow centers from which dispensaries could purchase their goods. Stanley said that would drive down costs and allow for fund managers to fund legitimate research and development focused on medical cures.

    “Now these dispensary owners who knew nothing about business or profit and loss or cash cycles, they don’t have to worry about it; they greet their customers. All the while they have a quality control company which the department of revenue has access to,” Stanley said.

    Stanley said that research and development funds could have been used to sponsor research into how cannabanoids not connected to THC could be developed.

    “We have had success with cannabinoids stopping the progression of Alzheimer’s disease,” Stanley said. “THC isn’t the medicine; it is the other 73 cannabinoids we haven’t been able to work with until we get this bill passed.”

    Barker’s substitute amendment ended at least the funding portion of Stanely’s proposed structure.

    “Law enforcement is against this bill because it promotes racketeering,” Stanley told the Colorado Independent. “How does it promote racketeering when you are dealing with grade A investors? The fact of the matter is that they are just opposed to this industry and they see it as an opportunity to shut it down. So the industry isn’t going anywhere. So do you want to promote the black market or do you want to knock it down and create a legitimate industry?”

    The bill will now goes to a third reading.
    By Joseph Boven | 04.11.11

    http://coloradoindependent.com/83496/medical-marijuana-investment-funds-wont-be-allowed-in-colorado

Comments

  1. Terrapinzflyer
    House nixes dispensary-financing trusts
    The plan would have bypassed banks that are wary of pot shops.]/I]

    Colorado lawmakers Monday debated — and rejected — a plan for the state to take a more active role in the financing of medical-marijuana dispensaries.

    As part of a bill to tweak the state's regulations for the medical-marijuana industry, state Rep. Tom Massey, R-Poncha Springs, proposed an amendment to create investment trusts for dispensaries. The state Department of Revenue would have set up the rules for the trusts and overseen them.

    Massey said the peculiar arrangement was needed because banks — which have to comply with federal law, under which all marijuana sales are illegal — have been reluctant to work with dispensaries. Without access to bank loans or accounts, dispensaries have had to rely on cash transactions. Supporters of Massey's amendments said such transactions undermine the state's efforts to audit dispensaries to ensure they are on the up and up.

    "When all this is being done in cash, in the shadows, there are a lot of elements that could come up and attract criminal activity," said Rep. Mark Ferrandino, D-Denver.

    Opponents of the amendment didn't disagree. But they said the proposed arrangement could have an even worse consequence: Making the state a conspirator in federal crimes.

    Rep. Mark Barker, R-Colorado Springs, said the trusts would skirt federal money-laundering laws. That could put investors in the trusts — and the state officials who regulate them — in the cross hairs of a federal racketeering investigation.

    "There's no way to get around this," Barker said. "State law cannot get you out of federal violations."

    Massey's amendment was defeated on a stand-up, sit-down vote.

    Meanwhile, the bigger measure — House Bill 1043 — passed, moving one step closer to becoming law. The bill clarifies several medical-marijuana regulations, including relaxing residency requirements for dispensary employees, making the locations of marijuana-growing facilities public and extending a statewide moratorium on new dispensaries.

    After a brief fight, lawmakers also approved a provision of the bill that directs some medical-pot tax revenue to the Circle Program, a substance-abuse and mental-illness treatment program at the Colorado Mental Health Institute at Pueblo. The program's supporters said it would have to be shuttered if the money was cut.

    HB 1043 needs one more vote of the House before heading to the Senate.



    By John Ingold
    04/12/2011
    http://www.denverpost.com/commented/ci_17822172?source=commented-
To make a comment simply sign up and become a member!