1. Dear Drugs-Forum readers: We are a small non-profit that runs one of the most read drug information & addiction help websites in the world. We serve over 4 million readers per month, and have costs like all popular websites: servers, hosting, licenses and software. To protect our independence we do not run ads. We take no government funds. We run on donations which average $25. If everyone reading this would donate $5 then this fund raiser would be done in an hour. If Drugs-Forum is useful to you, take one minute to keep it online another year by donating whatever you can today. Donations are currently not sufficient to pay our bills and keep the site up. Your help is most welcome. Thank you.

Mitch Winehouse: 'Amy's lasting legacy will be saving children from addiction'

By Hey :-), Mar 2, 2014 | | |
  1. Hey :-)
    Amy Winehouse Foundation will send ex-users into schools to talk openly about drugs and alcohol.

    She blazed a trail during her rollercoaster life and now, even in death, Amy Winehouse will be changing people's lives.

    The foundation set up in the late singer's name will launch a five-year programme tomorrow to take former drug users and alcoholics into schools, giving pupils the chance to talk openly about addiction issues with people who have experienced them first hand.

    Amy's father, Mitch, admitted that the decision to start rolling out the programme was born partly from frustration with the government's reluctance to make addiction issues a compulsory part of the national curriculum, something that he feels would have benefited both his daughter and himself.

    "Just after Amy passed away we went to see the Department for Education and the Department of Health and we spoke to them about getting the drug and alcohol education on to the school curriculum, and they really felt there was no necessity for it," Winehouse said. "They felt there was adequate education on that subject in schools, but there isn't. There are very good, well-meaning people out there, but it's on an ad hoc basis and we decided that, rather than wait for the government to galvanise itself into some kind of action, we would take the first steps."

    The impact of the programme, which has been tried in two pilot schemes in Hertfordshire, will be assessed by Harvard University. It will go into 50 schools and potentially reach 250,000 pupils over its duration. Backed by a £4.3m grant from the Big Lottery Fund, it will draw on the clinical expertise of Addaction, the respected drug and alcohol treatment charity, and will link to the NSPCC's Childline, which will provide confidential support. "I hope it makes people sit up and think," said the Big Lottery Fund England director, Dharmendra Kanani. "There is unbelievable brand value that is provided by the Amy Winehouse Foundation. It provides a real opportunity to win the hearts and minds of young people, because they can relate to someone from their living memory. It's very powerful."

    Some 250 volunteers, all former alcoholics and addicts in recovery, will deliver life-story "share" sessions and conduct workshops on issues such as self-esteem, peer pressure and risky behaviour. "The Department for Education felt that it was inappropriate that people in recovery should be delivering the message," Winehouse said. "They wanted the local policeman or the head nurse or the headmaster to deliver it. But they are totally the wrong people to deliver that kind of discussion. Kids wouldn't listen to them, and so we started formulating our plans about three months after Amy passed."

    The initiative is the latest from the foundation, which funds a number of projects, including children's hospices, three scholarships at the Sylvia Young Theatre School where Amy studied, and a homeless shelter.

    But Winehouse said he thought that the schools programme would be his daughter's lasting legacy and that the results from the pilot projects had been "quite staggering".

    "Initially the schools we went to didn't think they had a drug or alcohol problem, but very quickly, unfortunately, they found that they did, just as most schools do. We find that 40% of kids in schools struggle with alcohol or drugs – if not themselves, somebody close to them in their family – and the other 60% have issues such as body self-image, self-harm and bullying. We're calling it the Amy Winehouse Resilience Programme because it's not just looking to tackle alcohol and drugs but all these other things that affect young people today."

    Winehouse said the idea was to build up a body of evidence that could be shared with other schools in the future – and, crucially from his own experience, with parents, so that they were better informed.

    "I know as a parent I was apathetic and when my daughter was struggling with these problems I thought initially that it would go away. I thought it didn't affect my family, but it did." Winehouse said he struggled to find a way of reaching out to his daughter. "I would be shouting at Amy and pretending I was having a heart attack," he said.

    He expressed fears that too many parents were, as he was, ignorant of the issues. "We had a parents' meeting the other night in a school in London. When we speak to the kids in school there is 100% attendance and you can hear a pin drop. But in this school, which potentially had 3,000 parents, only 20 turned up. That's the crux of the problem: there is incredible apathy among parents."

    Simon Antrobus, Addaction's chief executive, praised the role played by the foundation in getting the programme up and running. "Then, and now, we've been hugely impressed with their commitment to addressing the lack of decent drug education in our schools and how they have campaigned for more and more pupils to benefit from this effective programme," he said.

    Winehouse is in no doubt what his daughter would think about the initiative. "I know exactly what she would say," he said. "She talks to me in my mind and I know she's proud of what we're doing. She loved kids, loved young people. She would be thrilled."

    By Jamie Doward
    Photograph Matt Dunham, AP; Amy Winehouse
    Sunday 2 March 2014
    The Guardian


  1. Poppi
    I think this is a great idea for a few reasons. First, it seems very clear that this will not be a scare-tactic campaign, but instead a means to reach struggling youth and open up lines of communication about the things that they deal with on a daily basis, from self-esteem to health issues like eating disorders and drug addiction. Though these programs exist here in the US, and are sometimes created and presented by recovering addicts and alcoholics, the tendency is not to engage the student in a discussion about what may be troubling them and showcasing the means to receive help should they need it, but rather to scare them with images of drug abuse and addiction they cannot relate to ("Faces of Meth" comes to mind, as does a recovering addict who, while describing her addiction which caused her to have her legs amputated, removes her prosthetics to shock the students).

    Approaching with care, combined with the Winehouse name and legacy, may very well appeal to young people who look up to media stars but view their drug use as either typical or inspiring. Perhaps this program, helpful as it hopefully will be and certainly borne out of tragedy, will be a means of restitution for Winehouse's past negative influence on the youth she claimed to have cared much for (I've seen her do a bump on stage in front of all these screaming teens) and a way her memory can be seen in a positive light.

    It's a shame 20 out of 300 available parents showed up for the informational meeting about Winehouse's program. Not only are most parents not involved in their child's school activities (I am in the educational field, and have seen it firsthand), but they are certainly apathetic to this issue. Many parents even of using teens have their heads buried in the sand and refuse to admit there's a problem. Hopefully when the enlightened teen comes home after Winehouse's seminar they find their parents willing and able to have open communication about what they've learned.
  2. Hey :-)
    I think you meant 20 of a possible 3,000 parents.

    I think it is also good to remember that assumption is not necessarily fact in this instance; re apathy.

    There may be many other reasons for the lack of parental attendance, especially with the often stigmatized issue of drug use/addiction.

    An alternative possible reason that comes to mind is that some parents may not want to be so open about their own current/past addiction/drug use. Maybe because of their jobs or maybe because some of the parents may be addicts themselves and fear honesty/having to do something about it and set an example. They may fear the dialogue with a recovering addict in front of their/other peoples children.

    I wonder how many of them smoke or go home after work each day to a bottle of wine. Addiction is not just about class A drug abuse and it does not seem to be a problem affecting youngsters only.

    Then there are possibly those parents who are pro-legalization, of marijuana for example. If they voiced their views honestly at one of these evenings would other children be discouraged from mixing with their own children by parents holding opposing views ?

    Maybe some of the children ditched the take home notice fearing their parents becoming too informed.

    Maybe this project just needs time to gain momentum.
To make a comment simply sign up and become a member!