1. Dear Drugs-Forum readers: We are a small non-profit that runs one of the most read drug information & addiction help websites in the world. We serve over 4 million readers per month, and have costs like all popular websites: servers, hosting, licenses and software. To protect our independence we do not run ads. We take no government funds. We run on donations which average $25. If everyone reading this would donate $5 then this fund raiser would be done in an hour. If Drugs-Forum is useful to you, take one minute to keep it online another year by donating whatever you can today. Donations are currently not sufficient to pay our bills and keep the site up. Your help is most welcome. Thank you.
  1. buseman
    [imgl=white]http://img716.imageshack.us/img716/1949/scales3.jpg[/imgl]New federal sentencing guidelines for crack cocaine offenses went into effect Monday, a week after the US Sentencing Commission promulgated them.

    The commission acted on a temporary basis to implement the Fair Sentencing Act, which was passed into law last summer. It will vote in May to make the changes permanent.

    The Fair Sentencing Act was passed in the face of growing uneasiness over racial disparities in federal drug sentences.

    From the 1980s until the act was passed, people caught with as little as five grams of crack cocaine faced mandatory minimum five-year prison sentences, while people caught with powder cocaine had to be caught with 500 grams before being hit with the mandatory minimum.

    More than 80% of federal crack prosecutions were aimed at blacks, even though more whites than blacks used crack.

    Under the new law, it will take 28 grams of crack to trigger the mandatory minimum five-year sentence.

    Under the old law, 50 grams of crack earned a mandatory minimum 10-year sentence; under the new law, the threshold rises to 280 grams. That means the old 100:1 sentencing disparity has been reduced to 18:1.

    That's not enough for groups like the November Coalition and Families Against Mandatory Minimums, which have fought for years for federal drug sentencing reform.

    Still on the agenda for reformers is eliminating the remaining sentencing disparity and making the law retroactive to benefit people already serving draconian federal crack sentences.

    It's not all good news. The new guidelines will also add months to some drug offender sentences.

    Aggravating factors such as intimidating girlfriends or elderly family members to sell drugs could earn drug gang leaders extra prison time.

    On the other hand, some low level offenders who were intimidated into participating in drug sales could see months shaved off their sentences.

    by Phillip Smith,
    November 02, 2010


  1. seven7seven
    A small step, but a least it is the right direction, the federal prison system is full of crack offenders.
  2. Terrapinzflyer
    It is my understanding that this will only apply to Federal charges- and that those charged by the state will still be subject to state mandatory minimum guidelines, which in some cases, especially in the southern part of the country, are even more disparate then the federal guidelines were.
  3. Moving Pictures
    That statement is kinda misleading. More whites use crack than blacks, yes. That's because, imo, there's more white people in this country than blacks. If you looked at percentages of crack users among their respective races, I think blacks would have a higher usage rate due to it's availability in the poor black community.

    As far as the number of federal crack cases against blacks, that's because more black people sell crack than white people. That's just how it is.

    I dunno, something about that line just bothered me. I do agree with these new sentencing guidlines. Possession of any kind of cocaine should be treated the same way.

    You still face way more time for LSD than crack, though. Maybe that should be addressed.
To make a comment simply sign up and become a member!