1. Dear Drugs-Forum readers: We are a small non-profit that runs one of the most read drug information & addiction help websites in the world. We serve over 4 million readers per month, and have costs like all popular websites: servers, hosting, licenses and software. To protect our independence we do not run ads. We take no government funds. We run on donations which average $25. If everyone reading this would donate $5 then this fund raiser would be done in an hour. If Drugs-Forum is useful to you, take one minute to keep it online another year by donating whatever you can today. Donations are currently not sufficient to pay our bills and keep the site up. Your help is most welcome. Thank you.
    PLEASE HELP
  1. source
    View attachment 27563 The prohibitionist impulse is strong. When confronted with a newly encountered psychoactive substance, there are always special pleaders to sound the alarm and politicians willing to reflexively resort to the power of the ban. Whether it is something with serious potential dangers, like the "bath salts" drugs, or something much more innocuous, like khat, the mild stimulant from the Horn of Africa, doesn't seem to matter; the prohibitionist impulse is strong.

    Kratom is a substance that falls on the more innocuous side of the psychoactive spectrum. It is the leaves of the kratom tree, mitragyna speciosa, which is native to Thailand and Indonesia, where the leaves have been chewed or brewed into a tea and used for therapeutic and social purposes for years. According to the online repository of psychoactive knowledge, the Vaults of Erowid, kratom acts as both a mild stimulant and a mild sedative, creates feelings of empathy and euphoria, is useful for labor, and is relatively short-acting.

    Of course, any psychoactive substance has its good and its bad sides, but kratom's downside doesn't seem very severe. Erowid lists its negatives as including a bitter taste, dizziness and nausea at higher doses, mild depression coming down, feeling hot and sweaty, and hangovers similar to alcohol. There is no mention of potential for addiction, and while fatal overdoses are theoretically possible, especially with its methanol and alkaloid extracts, in the real world, ODing on kratom doesn't appear to be an issue. No fatal overdoses are known to have actually occurred.

    On the other hand, some of kratom's alkaloids bind to opioid receptors in the brain, making it an opioid agonist, and it is now being sold in the West and used to treat pain, depression, anxiety and opiate withdrawal. Sold in smoke shops, herbal supplement emporia, and on the Internet, it is now apparently being lumped in with synthetic cannabinoids and the "bath salts" drugs by treatment professionals, law enforcement, and others who make a habit of searching for scary new drugs.

    Kratom is not listed as a banned substance in the 1961 Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs or its successor treaty, and has been banned in only a handful of countries, most ironically in Thailand itself. It was banned there in 1943, when then Thai government was taxing the opium trade and opium users were switching to kratom to aid in withdrawals and as a substitute.

    Arrests for kratom possession have jumped in recent years, from more than 1,200 in 2005 to more than 7,000 in 2009, even though the Thai Office of the Narcotics Control Board recommended to the Justice Department in 2010 that it be decriminalized because of the lack of any perceivable social harms.

    In the US, the DEA added kratom to its list of drugs of concern in 2010, although that doesn't mean that a federal ban is necessarily imminent. Salvia divinorum, for example, has been a drug of concern for more than a decade now, with no action taken. But while the feds haven't acted, there were efforts to ban kratom in several states in the US this year, although only Indiana actually succeeding in outlawing it. In Louisiana, age restrictions were placed on its purchase.

    The experience of Iowa, where legislation to ban kratom is still pending, is illustrative of how bans are created. The Iowa effort happened after state Rep. Clel Baudler (R) heard about kratom on a radio program. Within two hours, he was moving to ban it.

    "Kratom is a hallucinogen, addictive, and can be life threatening," he said at the time, in complete contradiction of all that is actually known about kratom.

    It's not just states that are considering bans on kratom. Pinellas County, Florida, was about to enact one this week, but the prohibitionist bandwagon hit a bump in the road in the form of perennial drug war gadfly Randy Heine, [pictured] owner of Rockin' Cards and Gifts in Pinellas Park, who told the Chronicle he had been selling kratom in his store since 1981.

    Seeing what was coming down the pike, Heine alerted the 'Kratom Association', a group of users, producers, and vendors dedicated to keeping kratom legal, who flooded county commissioners with emails. He also addressed the commission itself.

    "I have been selling kratom for over 30 years out of my store on Park Blvd. I challenge anyone to find any problem originating from my store selling kratom," he wrote in a letter made available to the Chronicle. "Do not lump in synthetic chemicals with an organic plant material. This is like comparing apples to oranges. I would like to see kratom be sold only to persons over the age of 18, similar to the proposal being made in our sister state of Louisiana."

    In the conservative county, Heine also appealed to the ghost of Ronald Reagan in his letter to commissioners. What riles up the Reagan in him, Heine wrote, is "growing the bureaucracy by creating another board to regulate what I and others do in privacy of our own homes."

    "I got letters back from two of the commissioners," said Heine. "They read my Ronald Reagan letter out loud, and one of the GOP commissioners thanked me for sharing my thoughts. The commission has now deferred this item so we can take a closer look at the issues involved."

    Many of his kratom customers are using it as an opiate substitute, he said.

    "We have a drug rehab place here, and my feeling is that a lot of their clients are purchasing kratom instead of methadone. It's competition; I'm taking away money," he said. "Some of my customers say methadone is worse than heroin and keeps you addicted. Kratom weans them off heroin. A lot of them say they just do less and less kratom until the craving stops. I have a couple of senior women who say they're tired of taking prescription pills, that they make them nutty, and kratom works for them."

    Chronicle readers may recall that Pinellas County is where a drug reform-minded upstart Democratic candidate for sheriff is taking on either the scandal-plagued Republican incumbent sheriff or his challenger and predecessor, former Sheriff Everett Rice (the GOP primary is next week), whose supporters on the council were pushing the kratom ban. That Democrat, Scott Swope, is so good on drug policy that his candidacy persuaded Heine to drop his own bid for the sheriff's office.

    "This looks like another unconstitutional intrusion into the lives of Pinellas citizens who aren't harming anyone," Swope said. "I've researched kratom and although there doesn't seem to be as much research available as cannabis, it appears to me to be a plant product that should not be banned. I think the purchase or possession of any of these things (cannabis, kratom, bath salts) by minors should not be allowed. Adults, however, should be free to do what they want as long as they aren't harming anyone else."

    While Heine is currently bedeviled by the effort to ban kratom, as well as an associated effort to force smoke shops to put large signs on their doors saying they sell drug paraphernalia, the Swope candidacy has him hoping for better times ahead.

    "Swope can win," he exulted. "We finally have a candidate who is talking about marijuana. Even the Republican candidates are now saying they wouldn't bust people for marijuana. When I was still a candidate, I went to many forums to talk about pot, and the media started asking these guys about it. Scott won't arrest people for personal use."

    Whether it's relatively unknown substances like kratom or now familiar substances like marijuana, the battle lines are drawn in what is ultimately a culture war. On one hand, the forces of fear and authoritarianism; on the other, the forces of free inquiry and personal liberty. It's been a long war, and it isn't going to end anytime soon, but perhaps now there are hints that the correlation of forces is changing.

    Stopping unnecessary prohibitions before they get started is part of the struggle; undoing entrenched prohibitions with powerful interests behind them is another part of the struggle, but even though the substances are different, it's the same struggle.

    By Phillip Smith, StopTheDrugWar.org 8th August 2012.

Comments

  1. stryder09
    The problem with Kratom is it sold directly side-by-side with legal high products and other research chemical containing products in smoke-shops, headshops, etc. It is sometimes marketed exactly like other products as well. I completely blame the shop owners/retailers for the inclusion of kratom in the banning of products/chemicals.
  2. psychedelia
    Kratom helps heroin addicts so kratom must be like heroin! Ugh, these people don't bother even researching anything. A hallucinogen? Hell no. I can accept that they keep drugs illegal that are already illegal (since that is the custom) but when they start banning things with medical use that are generally safe just because they're psychoactive... I hope this doesn't happen.
  3. profesor
    Guilt by association? Your comment would make sense if the gov't and DEA, even if misguided, were really concerned with Public Health. They don't give a shit. They make things illegal to justify the drug war budgets. They will probably laugh if a thousand more teens die from huffing solvents instead and say good riddance. I wish I could be more clear. They are not motivated by the well being of the populace.
    EDIT: maybe that was a little over the top. There are some individuals that care. The system itself is pretty evil though
  4. rawbeer
    ^^^ Obviously these people could give a shit about public safety but it is the unscrupulous vendors that made kratom something the general public knows about. They are harming this plants reputation by the company they are placing it in. Imagine if they started selling bee pollen in headshops next to K2 and zig-zags and had a picture of a stoned alien on the package, I bet a few wackos would want to ban it also.

    Kratom needs to be pushed down the same path as Kava and promoted as an herbal supplement, herbal tea, etc. It needs to find its way into health food stores and herbalist shops, not head shops. I'm glad there are people out their rushing to defend this plant, so far they've done pretty well in blocking these bans.

    It isn't the DEA pushing to ban it - they allow enough cocaine, heroin and pot to circulate in this country to keep their bullshit war going. When they and the CIA figure out how to use kratom to fund the terror campaigns of right wing narco-fascist death squads who keep the third world from taking control of its own resources, then maybe we'll see a kratom ban...
  5. profesor
    I don't completely buy that. The fact is that Thailand outlawed kratom a long time ago- apparently it is mixed with cough syrup as a popular high among locals hooligans. The substance already has a history. Although kratom might be presented along with bath salts- I don't think the general public really knows this or has investigated. To my knowledge it hasn't been on 20/20 or whatever. I don't like to be an apologist for irresponsible US vendors, but I think the impulse to ban it will come from an old xenophobic reaction to any foreign psychoactive substance (that isn't alcohol) Vendors don't help its reputation, but I still think you are misplacing blame.
  6. Carminius Finger
    The issues with any legal/pseudo-legal substance seems to arise when headshops start to market it as "legal dope" and give it a bad rap, selling it to youngsters and so on...i think they should make all substances legal and set an age limit of 21 to all of them whether it be kava, pot, heroin, or bath salt. When a store decides to start selling one of these substances they should have to obtain individual licenses. This would keep the shady headshop/adult bookstore type vendors (who have absolutely no ethics and care nothing about the consumers well-being) from giving each substance a bad image.
  7. Pine93
    If kratom is banned, opiate addicts will lose a strong ally.
To make a comment simply sign up and become a member!