1. Dear Drugs-Forum readers: We are a small non-profit that runs one of the most read drug information & addiction help websites in the world. We serve over 4 million readers per month, and have costs like all popular websites: servers, hosting, licenses and software. To protect our independence we do not run ads. We take no government funds. We run on donations which average $25. If everyone reading this would donate $5 then this fund raiser would be done in an hour. If Drugs-Forum is useful to you, take one minute to keep it online another year by donating whatever you can today. Donations are currently not sufficient to pay our bills and keep the site up. Your help is most welcome. Thank you.
    PLEASE HELP
  1. Beenthere2Hippie
    Hillary Rodham Clinton’s carefully choreographed round-table discussions with voters don’t lead to many moments of surprise. But Mrs. Clinton has seemed to have had some legitimate jolts when conversations in Iowa and New Hampshire repeatedly drifted back to drug abuse.

    Mrs. Clinton called heroin and methamphetamine addiction in rural America a “quiet epidemic” and told her policy advisers in Brooklyn to put it on the list of priorities as her campaign inched closer toward presenting a specific policy platform.

    As part of that effort, last week senior campaign policy advisers held Google Hangout discussions with local officials and substance abuse activists in Iowa and New Hampshire to see how the campaign could best address the problem, the first of such discussions that will take place in the early nominating states, according to the campaign.

    In the six years Mrs. Clinton has been mostly out of the discussion on domestic policies, heroin use has swept rural communities, and although aides say she was aware of problem in an abstract way, from reading policy briefings and talking to academics and advisers, her discussions with voters on the issue were particularly eye opening.

    She instructed her policy team “to go beyond standard policies and really take a hard look at some of the more creative or forward-looking policy positions,” said Jake Sullivan, the campaign’s senior policy director.

    The Google Hangouts, led by the senior policy advisers Ann O’Leary and Maya Harris, are part of that effort. Moving forward, drug addiction, according to aides, will be a central part of the “four fights” that Mrs. Clinton routinely references in her prepared remarks.

    Participants in the hangouts included Candace Accord, of the Community Based Correctional Facility in Cedar Rapids, Iowa, and Abigail Shockley, executive director of the New Hampshire Alcohol and Other Drug Service Provider Association, among other local community leaders and elected officials.

    Based on their suggestions, Mrs. Clinton is likely to propose better-financed prevention and treatment options before criminalization and better access to mental health services (an area that aides and voters have said is lacking under the Affordable Care Act). She has already called for reform to the criminal justice system and a prison system overflowing with low-level drug offenders.

    Drug abuse has not been a central campaign issue since the 1980s and early 1990s, when crime was on the rise and the crack cocaine epidemic threatened American cities. Candidates, particularly Republicans, and the more centrist-minded Bill Clinton were elected by vowing to be tough on drugs. Under President Bill Clinton’s administration, drug offenders received stiffer penalties under federal law.

    In the 2016 election, Mrs. Clinton enters a very different situation, in which rural areas, like the ones she has visited in Iowa and New Hampshire, are seeing an increase in addiction. She is expected to present more specific policy proposals after her campaign’s official kickoff event on June 13.

    “We have an increasing problem that is only beginning to break through the surface so that people – I think a lot of people are thinking, well, that’s somebody else’s problem, that’s not my problem,” Mrs. Clinton has said.



    By Amy Chozik - The NY Times/ June 1, 2015
    http://www.nytimes.com/politics/fir...ng-scale-of-problem/?partner=rss&emc=rss&_r=0
    Newshawk Crew

    About Author

    Beenthere2Hippie
    BT2H is a retired news editor and writer from the NYC area who, for health reasons, retired to a southern US state early, and where BT2H continues to write and to post drug-related news to DF.

Comments

  1. Joe-(5-HTP)
    I did not inhale.
    I did not have sex with that woman.

    lol. In seriousness though, this sounds pretty good and progressive? Not much details though, surprise surprise.
  2. Beenthere2Hippie
    No matter how much she and her husband make my skin crawl, if she comes out in favor of changing marijuana's current status and/or talks about decriminalizing or legalizing pot on a federal level, I'll then be here girl...shudder. It'll be interesting to see where this goes.
  3. prescriptionperil
    I'm not a big Clinton lover, (How naive was I to not vote in that election, because slick Willie the cad lied about a bj? Bushs' lies about weapon of mass destruction put that into perspective) but believe she's qualified.

    The role model for drug reform should be Portugal.

    First, get cannabis off the federal classification of Schedule One. Then change our racist prison system.

    God forbid, some Republican clown comes along, and takes away my state approved medical marijuana. Although, good luck putting that genie back in the bottle.
To make a comment simply sign up and become a member!