1. Dear Drugs-Forum readers: We are a small non-profit that runs one of the most read drug information & addiction help websites in the world. We serve over 4 million readers per month, and have costs like all popular websites: servers, hosting, licenses and software. To protect our independence we do not run ads. We take no government funds. We run on donations which average $25. If everyone reading this would donate $5 then this fund raiser would be done in an hour. If Drugs-Forum is useful to you, take one minute to keep it online another year by donating whatever you can today. Donations are currently not sufficient to pay our bills and keep the site up. Your help is most welcome. Thank you.
    PLEASE HELP

One in seven Scots on anti-depressants, NHS figures show

By source, Sep 26, 2012 | | |
  1. source
    One in seven Scots are now taking anti-depressants, official figures show.

    Twice as many women as men were prescribed the drugs in 2011-12 - totalling 483,431 women and 234,899 men and representing 14% of the population.

    Anti-depressant prescriptions have risen across all age groups, with 24 children aged 0-4 prescribed the drugs last year, compared to 10 in 2009-10.

    But statisticians urged caution over the figures, as some anti-depressants were prescribed for other conditions.

    The report states: "It does not equate to people being treated for depression.

    "This is because many drugs classified as anti-depressants can also used for conditions other than depression. These include but are not restricted to neuropathic pain, post-traumatic stress disorder and anxiety disorders."

    Anti-depressant prescriptions have risen steadily from 1.26 million drugs dispensed in 1993-94 to 5.01 million in 2011-12.

    The cost to the NHS in Scotland this year was £31.3m - more than double the cost of anti-depressant prescriptions in 1993-94, but far lower than the £58.7m bill in 2004-05.

    The figures published by the NHS Information Services Division also revealed prescriptions for anti-psychotic drugs have almost doubled in the same period.

    There were 817,937 prescriptions for psychoses-related drugs in 2011-12, up from 445,081 in 1993-94.

    Again, female patients outstripped male patients in psychoses-related prescriptions, with 42,592 women and 35,879 men, totalling about 1.5% of the population.

    Use of psychoses-related drugs are most prevalent in patients in their 40s, and their use by very young children has also risen in recent years. A total of 29 children aged 0-4 were prescribed psychoses-related drugs in 2011-12, compared with 20 in 2009-10.

    The report stated: "People experiencing psychoses may report hallucinations or delusional beliefs, and may exhibit personality changes and thought disorder.

    "Depending on its severity, this may be accompanied by unusual or bizarre behaviour, as well as difficulty with social interaction and impairment in carrying out daily life activities."

    It added: "There is an increasing trend in the number of patients who received a drug for psychoses and related disorders, peaking at ages 45-49 and then steadily decreasing as patients get older."

    And the use of drugs to treat attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, which is most commonly diagnosed in children, is now 20 times higher than it more than a decade ago, according to the report.

    There were 4,115 prescriptions issued for this condition in 1995-96, rising to 84,269 in 2011-12.

    Their use is most common between the ages of five and 19, and unlike anti-depressants and psychoses-related drugs, many more males (6,103) than females (1,403) were prescribed ADHD medication in 2011-12.

    'Being drugged'


    Conservative health spokesman Jackson Carlaw said: "It has now been several years since the SNP promised to halt the rise in people being given anti-depressants.

    "What's more, drugs are being depended on to fight other mental health issues such as ADHD and dementia, when research has shown other, sometimes very straightforward therapies can be more effective.

    "The idea of our very young people, and our very old, being drugged as a matter of course in either the formative or closing years of their life is completely unacceptable. The SNP has to get a handle on this before it gets even more out of control."

    A Scottish government spokeswoman said: "Many of these medications enable patients who might otherwise have been disabled by their mental health condition to live a normal life in the community.

    "They are effective evidence-based treatments for mental illness. Where anti-depressants are being prescribed, it is in line with good clinical practice."

    COST OF PSYCHOSES DRUGS

    • £1.9m for 445,081 items in 1993-94
    • £9.2m for 611,226 items in 1999-00
    • £24.4m for 626,210 items in 2005-06
    • £34.7m for 817,937 items in 2011-12

    COST OF ANTI-DEPRESSANTS


    • £14.1m for 1.2 million items in 1993-94
    • £44.5m for 2.5 million items in 1999-00
    • £54.9m for 3.5 million items in 2005-06
    • £31.3m for 5.01 million items in 2011-12
    Tuesday 25 September 2012 Last updated at 17:38
    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-19717592

Comments

  1. constant limbo
    imo yet again it's more about the money than the patients...

    would'nt it be nice if they had brought this subject up,due to concerns about how people are being treated,rather than hey were spending way too much cash,so get it sorted out

    no doubt people will suffer as they try and sort this out,i have noticed where i live that there seems to be a fad of which is the " in drug " to prescribe,now i don't know if these drugs are reccomended in doctors journals,or its just a case of what the drug companys sales rep's are touting at the time.

    re depression,anxiety,etc in my area
    20 years ago valium was what doctors gave out in copious amounts to treat the above

    10 years ago it was amitriptyline

    present times it seems to be Mirtazapine,thats the doc's drug of choice to treat the above

    i would love to know if these drugs are being used,because they are the best treatment available,or are they used just because it's the cheapest way to treat people,effectively parking them up on cheap drugs,and although they are no further towards being cured,they are no longer a problem in their zombiefied state

    also do the doctors benifit in any way,by dishing out a certain drug companys latest pills,over another companys pills,what incentives are being given to doctors to use certain brand names ?

    i understand a medical practice only has limited funds in which to treat their patients,but how many times do certain types of illness,get prescribed cheaper alternative short term solutions,that end up turning into long term issues ?

    also when they work out how those long term issues are now costing a lot more,because people are effectively on them for life,the patient loses out,when they deem treatment is costing too much,so something has to be done to cut costs

    cheers,constant limbo
To make a comment simply sign up and become a member!