1. Dear Drugs-Forum readers: We are a small non-profit that runs one of the most read drug information & addiction help websites in the world. We serve over 4 million readers per month, and have costs like all popular websites: servers, hosting, licenses and software. To protect our independence we do not run ads. We take no government funds. We run on donations which average $25. If everyone reading this would donate $5 then this fund raiser would be done in an hour. If Drugs-Forum is useful to you, take one minute to keep it online another year by donating whatever you can today. Donations are currently not sufficient to pay our bills and keep the site up. Your help is most welcome. Thank you.

Police methods for destroying drug evidence vary

  1. Basoodler

    FILE - In this Jan. 16, 2014 file photo, Ohio Highway Patrol Lt. Anne Ralston stands in a storage area for boxes of drugs already tested by the Patrol's crime lab in Columbus, Ohio. For years, Ohio troopers destroyed thousands of pounds of seized drugs for free at factories where the containers were placed into molten steel and disintegrated. That practice has become less tenable over time as companies worried about emissions and environmental concerns and whether the process might skew employee drug tests. (AP Photo/Kantele Franko, File)

    COLUMBUS, Ohio (AP) — Cardboard boxes and paper envelopes packed with marijuana, cocaine and other drugs line warehouse-style shelves at the State Highway Patrol's Ohio crime laboratory, where seizures large and small are stored for safekeeping for sometimes years until they're no longer needed as evidence.

    Then comes a tricky task: How do you destroy it all?

    Most often by incineration, but where and how varies, according to police spokesmen and officers who oversee evidence. Arranging evidence burns can be tricky because rules are different everywhere, allowing more leeway in some places than others.

    Police have used crematories, foundries, hospital incinerators or specialized businesses — and even torched drugs in 55-gallon drums.

    Troopers in Ohio used to destroy thousands of pounds of seized drugs — for free — at factories where they could be vaporized in molten steel. But the companies worried about it potentially affecting the quality of their product and producing emissions: the kind that create environmental concerns and the kind that could skew employee drug tests, said Capt. David Dicken, a director at the crime lab.

    "If we're throwing 940 pounds of marijuana into the vat, you know, it flares up," he said.

    To maintain a dedicated drug destroyer, the agency switched last year to a paid contract with a federally permitted company that handles hazardous materials.

    Federal standards regulate waste incinerators that burn pharmaceuticals, but those used only for contraband are exempt from those rules, said Dina Pierce, a spokeswoman for the Ohio Environmental Protection Agency.

    Various local environmental and safety rules can apply, creating a complicated regulatory picture for evidence-management officers sorting out what destruction methods are allowed, said Joseph Latta, an instructor and executive director at the Burbank, California-based nonprofit International Association for Property and Evidence Inc.

    "During the class, we say, 'Here are the ways that we've heard of. Here are the legal ways. Here are some maybe unorthodox ways that we've had to do," Latta said.

    U.S. Customs and Border Patrol, which seizes millions of pounds of illegal narcotics, pays contractors to destroy the drugs or turns them over to other agencies, such as the Drug Enforcement Agency, said Jaime Ruiz, a CBP spokesman.

    DEA destroys marijuana at EPA-approved incinerators because those seizures are generally bulkier, and it burns other contraband drugs at its labs, said Special Agent Rich Isaacson, spokesman for the agency's Detroit division.

    In California, where environmental regulations tend to be stricter, the legal option is usually limited to EPA-approved energy-plant incinerators that operate under emissions and security standards, Latta said. But reaching those sites could be impractical for smaller, more rural law enforcement agencies that take in lesser amounts of drugs, he said, acknowledging some "have probably taken shortcuts."

    It can be a dilemma for officers who must either arrange for destruction or allow drug evidence to accumulate, which risks making the storage area a potential theft target, Latta said.

    Other jurisdictions have more choices: State police in the Detroit area use a metal forging plant's high-temperature furnace, but smaller posts use burn barrels. Indiana State Police have similar options. Pennsylvania State Police handle drug destruction internally, such as with a small incinerator. New York State Police use an outside contractor they won't disclose.

    In West Virginia, some authorities may use fire pits, state police Capt. Joe White said.

    Drug destruction arrangements with steel facilities still work for some agencies, including Columbus, Ohio, police and the FBI's Cleveland division. Cincinnati police are using that option for the first time this year because the university facility they used in the past stopped providing the service, department spokeswoman Sgt. Julian Johnson said.

    Especially when drug-destruction work is pro bono, police tend to be tight-lipped about details to protect security, the businesses involved and sometimes the arrangements themselves.

    "The word gets out there that this facility does it, then 50 other agencies want to go there ... and that gets to be too much for that place to handle, and then you lose that place. And then you've got to go find another one," said Sgt. Jeff Yaney, who oversees evidence for Dayton, Ohio, police.

    Yaney wouldn't divulge where the department destroys drugs. It used to take advantage of the incinerator that burned classified materials at nearby Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, but the base replaced it with a shredder rather than paying for changes to meet environmental rules a few years ago.

    Representatives for two federally permitted hazardous waste incinerators in Ohio, Ross Environmental Services Inc. near Elyria and the patrol's vendor, Heritage Environmental Services in East Liverpool, said they provide a more controlled, secure destruction process with environmental protections and benefits not necessarily found at other types of facilities.

    For that, though, agencies generally must pay. Heritage has destroyed about 10,000 pounds of drugs and paraphernalia since July for the patrol, at a cost of roughly $22,000, said Lt. Craig Cvetan, a patrol spokesman. The funding came from seized drug money, which is also used for drug enforcement and drug-abuse prevention programs.


    Associated Press writers Marc Levy in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, Ed White in Detroit and Michael Virtanen in Albany, New York, contributed to this report.

    May 25th 2014


  1. Basoodler
    So the plan ends after the drugs leave the crime lab.... Then the different agencies just do whatever they figure is best to store or destroy the drugs?

    I wonder how much is just recirculating back to the street.. You would think that actually destroying the drugs would have been an element of the plan in a war focused on destroying drugs. Its like Dr evil leaving Austin powers alone with sharks (w/ lasers on their heads) as a form of assassination..
  2. ErrorInTheMachine
    Heres what baffles me.

    If the "drug dealer" or "drug-related criminal" is not allowed to keep the money that THEY CLAIM he/she got from "selling drugs," then why is it that the same money in question is used to pay the police!?

    So in layman's terms the police work like this:

    Police Officer: "You got that money from selling drugs"
    Alleged Criminal: "No I didn't"
    Police Officer: "Yes you did, so we have to confiscate it to pay ourselves. And you go to jail. Thanks for making my paycheck using allegedly illegally-obtained money."

    This doesn't make sense. Its not even remotely the right thing to do. This money should literally never touch police. I agree with giving SOME of it to state-run rehabilitation centers, but most of it should go into Drug Education, which is something that America doesn't offer.

    If they did, they wouldn't be able to criminalize a lot of substances because everybody would be educated enough to know the drugs in question could be less dangerous than alcohol or nicotine, and therefore police would no longer get the extra cash for "busting criminals."

    You see, I hate to see the police ruin this country. Its not that I hate police--in fact I believe without them we would be living in a vicious hole. However, the police should NEVER run themselves, and this is exactly what has happened. No different from any other police state. Whatever they say goes and everyone else is wrong and is only agreeing because their hiding something and/or are involved with criminal acts.

    Its this sort of thing that is ruining our country. It goes all the way up the chain of government officials. The people should ALWAYS have ALL the power, and the government should be working for the people--that is what democracy really is. What America has now is nothing more than an oligarchy (congress) which controls the laws and rights of the people--leaving themselves out of most if not all of it. And the way they enforce this is by getting police to 'control' the people.

    The forefathers of America would be rebelling if they existed today. Alas, during their protest they'd be labeled as "terrorists" for disagreeing with the their own government that they unknowingly founded.
  3. enhu
    Police Department should at least have their own facilities to destroy these evidences if they really intend to do it else these drugs will be back on streets. A respectable elder of ours I remember him telling when money is involve morality may not matter.
To make a comment simply sign up and become a member!