1. Dear Drugs-Forum readers: We are a small non-profit that runs one of the most read drug information & addiction help websites in the world. We serve over 4 million readers per month, and have costs like all popular websites: servers, hosting, licenses and software. To protect our independence we do not run ads. We take no government funds. We run on donations which average $25. If everyone reading this would donate $5 then this fund raiser would be done in an hour. If Drugs-Forum is useful to you, take one minute to keep it online another year by donating whatever you can today. Donations are currently not sufficient to pay our bills and keep the site up. Your help is most welcome. Thank you.
  1. Beenthere2Hippie
    MINNESOTA - Last time we checked, cannabis was still a Schedule I narcotic in Minnesota. Why? Because, according to the statute, it has, like heroin, "A high potential for abuse, no currently accepted medical use in the United States, and a lack of accepted safety for use under medical supervision."

    At least the last of those two is false. Minnesota is in the midst of establishing a medical cannabis program and 21 other states, plus D.C., have their own on the books. Other states, like Utah, allow for the use of CBD-rich oil to treat certain ailments.

    Noting this, Kurtis Hanna, a cannabis activist, has presented a petition to the regulatory agency in charge of classifying cannabis: the Minnesota Board of Pharmacy. He'll present his argument at the board's December 10 meeting, but you can read it ahead of time below.

    The board has twice rejected Hanna's assertion that cannabis ought to be removed from the Schedule I designation in Minnesota, claiming a change would put Minnesota at odds with the feds. Then the board turned around and successfully lobbied the state legislature to remove its own rule-making authority.

    This time around, Hanna is requesting that the board recommend rescheduling cannabis in its end-year reports to the state legislature in hopes that lawmakers see the contradiction of their own making.

    More than a few people have defended themselves from prosecution, claiming the law violated their due process -- but without being able to talk about the medical benefits of cannabis in court they couldn't adequately defend themselves. But the courts tend to throw the question of scheduling back at the board of pharmacy, which wants nothing to do with it.

    In filing the petition, Hanna is asking for clarification over who the hell is actually responsible for reforming cannabis laws.

    "It's a gray area that needs to be cleared up," he tells us.

    By Jesse Marx - City Pages-Blog/Oct. 21, 2014
    Newshawk Crew

    Author Bio

    BT2H is a retired news editor and writer from the NYC area who, for health reasons, retired to a southern US state early, and where BT2H continues to write and to post drug-related news to DF.


To make a comment simply sign up and become a member!