1. Dear Drugs-Forum readers: We are a small non-profit that runs one of the most read drug information & addiction help websites in the world. We serve over 4 million readers per month, and have costs like all popular websites: servers, hosting, licenses and software. To protect our independence we do not run ads. We take no government funds. We run on donations which average $25. If everyone reading this would donate $5 then this fund raiser would be done in an hour. If Drugs-Forum is useful to you, take one minute to keep it online another year by donating whatever you can today. Donations are currently not sufficient to pay our bills and keep the site up. Your help is most welcome. Thank you.

Sen. Rand Paul (R-TN) cites "radical Islam" as reason to block synthetic drugs ban

  1. Rob Cypher
    Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.), as part of an ongoing effort to block a federal ban of synthetic drugs, once cited the threat of "radical Islam" as a reason for opposition.

    The warning was mentioned in a December letter obtained by the Bowling Green Daily News to Sens. Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.) and Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa), who have authored efforts to block synthetic drugs. The Kentucky senator warns of the difficulties of people finding employment after being released from prison.

    He then says, "In addition, there has been much discussion in the Senate regarding combatting radical Islam. Notably, Islam is currently the fastest-growing religion among prisoners in the United States. Sending people -- often young people -- who may already come from broken homes and difficult family situations into a brutal prison environment is potentially a breeding ground for radicalization."

    Paul told the Daily News that he stood by his comments but that that threat was not his reason for opposition. Paul's spokesman has said that he thinks drug enforcement is a state and local issue.

    Paul, the son of GOP presidential candidate Rep. Ron Paul (R-Texas), is singlehandedly blocking bills that would outlaw synthetic drugs with a Senate hold. The parliamentary move prevents the bill from reaching the Senate floor, but could be overridden by 60 senators.

    The House of Representatives voted on Dec. 8 to ban synthetic drugs by a 317-98 vote. The measure also bans chemical compounds in the drugs that have been marketed as substitutes for marijuana and narcotics.

    Critics of the bill, including Paul, have also cited the restriction of chemical compounds as a reason to oppose the bill, saying that it could hinder legitimate medical and pharmaceutical research on them.

    The AP reported last year that the drugs -- marketed by names such as "K2" and "Spice" -- have been responsible for thousands of hospital visits. Military officials have also been alarmed by the rise of usage of synthetic marijuana by U.S. troops.

    More than 40 states have banned some of the chemicals in the drugs.

    [Originally posted on Huffington Post; having trouble including a plain text link for some reason. my bad]


  1. Rob Cypher
    Re: Sen. Rand Paul (R-TN) cites "radical Islam" as reason to block synthetic drugs ba

    Yeesh. I have mixed feelings about this ban (I don't like the idea of stuff being taken from folks, but I've tried various brands of this stuff in the past when it was legal and did not like it), but Rand Paul is using some stupid logic here IMO. [I really dislike him and his dad; I think they make the legalization movement look like a joke with their cultish followers and their rigid libertarian ideological stance.]

    When are we going to get more credible folks to represent the decriminalization/legalization movement in the US House/Senate? The Pauls are not it (the dad loves to hang out with racists and the son's followers engage in thuggish assault tactics on dissenters).
To make a comment simply sign up and become a member!