1. Dear Drugs-Forum readers: We are a small non-profit that runs one of the most read drug information & addiction help websites in the world. We serve over 4 million readers per month, and have costs like all popular websites: servers, hosting, licenses and software. To protect our independence we do not run ads. We take no government funds. We run on donations which average $25. If everyone reading this would donate $5 then this fund raiser would be done in an hour. If Drugs-Forum is useful to you, take one minute to keep it online another year by donating whatever you can today. Donations are currently not sufficient to pay our bills and keep the site up. Your help is most welcome. Thank you.
    PLEASE HELP
  1. Beenthere2Hippie
    View attachment 41829 Nearly half the states in the US now allow medical marijuana. But even as the drug's legal medicinal use spreads throughout the country, there's a lot of confusion over what, exactly, medical marijuana is all about. Some people question whether marijuana is really medicine in the first place. Opponents often say it's just a backdoor to the legalization of recreational pot. And some supporters make all sorts of wild claims about what the drug can treat.

    Some of the issues surrounding medical marijuana are entirely subjective or still being studied, but there are a few cases in which people simply get the facts wrong. Here are seven myths about medical marijuana. In a Fox Business interview, Gary Johnson, CEO of Cannabis Sativa and former Libertarian presidential candidate, suggested that marijuana could be used to cure Ebola. There is absolutely no scientific evidence to support that claim.

    Myth 1. Marijuana Can Treat Ebola


    But Johnson's remarks provide a glimpse at what the commercialization of marijuana could look like. It's common for big companies to use crises to justify policies that favor them, particularly deregulation. Johnson, in his comments, was doing exactly the same thing — regardless of the actual scientific evidence.

    Myth 2. Marijuana Can't be Medicine

    The federal government's classification for marijuana — schedule 1, the strictest category in the scheduling system — indicates that marijuana has no medical value.

    The available research and various reports disagree. Several studies and anecdotal evidence suggest marijuana can be used for various medical problems, including pain, nausea and loss of appetite, Parkinson's disease, inflammatory bowel disease, PTSD, epilepsy, and multiple sclerosis. Some of these treatments have been proven to work on children, particularly those with forms of epilepsy that can induce hundreds of seizures a day.

    For some people, marijuana seems to be the only thing that works. One cancer patient told me in 2013 that taking marijuana eased her epilepsy, nausea, and loss of appetite. She tried conventional medication first, but none of her prescriptions were effective in addressing all of her medical problems. "Without medical marijuana, I wouldn’t be alive today," she said. "It really has changed my life for the better."

    The federal government doesn't give credence to the available research and anecdotes because it has a much higher threshold for medical evidence. To validate medical value through the scheduling system, the entire marijuana plant must have large-scale clinical trials to back it up — similar to what the Food and Drug Administration would expect from any other drug entering the market. But this research has also been tough.

    Myth #3: Medical marijuana is de facto legalization

    Opponents often characterize medical marijuana legalization as a backdoor to the full legalization of recreational pot. The argument is that most people don't actually need marijuana for medical purposes; they're just obtaining medical marijuana cards to use the drug recreationally. Much of this sentiment is rooted in reports of the medical marijuana program in California, which has struggled for years to get its largely unregulated medical marijuana industry under control.

    But it doesn't have to be this way — and in some places, it's not. The medical marijuana program in New Jersey is so strict that fewer than 3,000 patients have signed up, far fewer than the tens of thousands expected. And some parents are leaving the state to get their sick children access to pot in places with laxer laws. The medical marijuana program in Washington, DC, is also fairly strict, and schemes in New York and Minnesota are expected to be tightly regulated as well.

    Medical marijuana programs can also vary in many ways from state to state. Some, like California, allow medical marijuana dispensaries and home cultivation; others, such as Alaska, only allow home cultivation; and a few, including Delaware, allow dispensaries but not home cultivation.

    Myth #4: Marijuana can always be broken down into components for medicine

    Maybe marijuana can be medicine, opponents say, but only if it's broken down into different components. "Many plants, including marijuana, have medicinal properties," writes Kevin Sabet of Smart Approaches to Marijuana. View attachment 41828 "But that doesn't mean that in order to derive those medicinal benefits, we should smoke or ingest its raw, crude form. After all, we don't smoke opium to get the benefits of morphine."

    The problem is there are hundreds of cannabinoids in marijuana — and it's not clear how they all interact with each other. CBD, a non-psychoactive component of marijuana, may work really well for some children suffering from seizures, but it doesn't appear to work by itself for everyone.

    Joanna Buffum at New Jersey Monthly reported: It is known that patients react to a variety of cannabinoids in the plant, not just THC and CBD. It is not known why certain cannabinoids, or a combination of several, work for some patients and not for others. For Jax Stormes, CBD by itself doesn’t work. He needs a mixture of THC, CBD and another cannabinoid, THCa.

    "Everyone sees CBD as some type of miracle treatment," says Dr. Lorraine Lazar, a pediatric neurologist at Morristown Medical Center's Goryeb Children's Hospital. She doesn’t agree. "I think CBD will be just like other therapies. It's not going to be the end-all for everyone."

    Researchers are still studying all the components of marijuana to determine the full effects of each major cannabinoid. It may be possible someday to break down marijuana into its various components for more precise forms of medicine, but the science just isn't there yet. In the meantime, many patients argue it's better for them to get some relief through the whole marijuana plant, even if it causes an unnecessary high.

    Myth #5: Marijuana isn't medicine because it's smoked

    Opponents of medical marijuana legalization, including SAM and the Drug Enforcement Administration, often argue that pot isn't medicine because it's smoked. Even a landmark study by the Institute of Medicine that supported medical marijuana suggested that smoking the drug is risky.

    But a lot of people who smoke medicinal marijuana get medical benefits from it. Marijuana also doesn't have to be smoked; it can be consumed through vaporization, pills, edibles, dabs, and patches. Some medical marijuana states, like New York and Minnesota, even prohibit patients from smoking pot.

    Myth #6: Medical marijuana is politically controversial

    With the way politicians approach medical marijuana, one would think that it's still a very touchy subject. Even Hillary Clinton, widely expected to be the Democratic presidential contender in 2016, has said she only supports medical marijuana "for people who are in extreme medical conditions" and "under appropriate circumstances," and she wants more research before she makes up her mind on the issue.

    But medical marijuana actually has massive bipartisan support among voters across the country. A 2010 Pew Research Center survey found 73 percent of American voters support medical marijuana, including 61 percent of Republicans. Even when the medical marijuana amendment lost in Florida on November 4, it got nearly 58 percent of the vote — more votes than re-elected Gov. Rick Scott, but not enough to meet Florida's 60 percent requirement for constitutional amendments.

    Myth #7: The federal government patents medical marijuana
    Almost every article I write about medical marijuana or the drug scheduling system is followed by tweets and emails asking about the federal government's patent on the medical use of marijuana. The messages, mostly from legalization supporters, argue that if the federal government patents medical marijuana, then surely the feds know the drug has medical value and should be rescheduled.

    But the federal government doesn't patent medical marijuana. It patents the medical use of some compounds in marijuana, including CBD. The patent specifically avoids psychoactive cannabinoids, like THC, and doesn't include the whole marijuana plant. The patent also doesn't prove marijuana has medical value, although it does acknowledge the drug's medical potential. For the purposes of rescheduling, though, the federal government needs large-scale clinical trials similar to what the FDA requires for other drugs, not a simple nod at potential.

    What is Medical Marijuana?

    Medical marijuana is just marijuana except, as the name implies, it's used for medical instead of recreational purposes. Some studies and anecdotal evidence suggest marijuana can be used for various medical problems, including pain, nausea and loss of appetite, Parkinson's disease, inflammatory bowel disease, PTSD (post-traumatic stress disorder), epilepsy, and multiple sclerosis.

    One study suggested the legalization of medical marijuana could even lead to fewer prescription painkiller deaths, since marijuana can relieve pain without the risks of overdose and dependency that come with opioid-based pharmaceuticals. In states that legalized marijuana for medical purposes, there were nearly 25 percent fewer deaths from prescription painkillers than expected, based on historical rates and trends in places that don't allow medicinal pot.

    But the federal government doesn't recognize this medical potential, largely because the studies have been small so far, and there have been no large-scale clinical trials proving pot's medicinal value.

    It's long been difficult to conduct thorough studies on the medical uses of marijuana, because of the drug's prohibition and the need for approval from a federal government that's more interested in studying marijuana's potential for abuse than its benefits. This creates a bit of a Catch-22: there needs to be a certain level of scientific research proving marijuana has medical value, but the federal government's restrictions make it difficult to conduct that research.

    Still, some experts now claim it's time to seriously look at marijuana's medical benefits. Dr. Sanjay Gupta of CNN in 2013 cited a loud chorus of legitimate patients when he announced his shift in position to support for medical marijuana. For marijuana advocates, Gupta's headline-grabbing support represented a major shift in the medical world's attitude toward the drug.

    Several states have already legalized medical marijuana, although the drug remains illegal for all purposes at the federal level. States' laws can significantly differ: some, like California, allow medical marijuana dispensaries and home cultivation; others, such as Alaska, only allow home cultivation; and a few, such as Delaware, allow dispensaries but not home cultivation.



    By German Lopez - Vox.com/Nov. 18, 2014
    http://www.vox.com/2014/11/18/7218893/medical-cannabis-legalization-ebola
    Newshawk Crew

    Author Bio

    Beenthere2Hippie
    BT2H is a retired news editor and writer from the NYC area who, for health reasons, retired to a southern US state early, and where BT2H continues to write and to post drug-related news to DF.

Comments

To make a comment simply sign up and become a member!