1. Dear Drugs-Forum readers: We are a small non-profit that runs one of the most read drug information & addiction help websites in the world. We serve over 4 million readers per month, and have costs like all popular websites: servers, hosting, licenses and software. To protect our independence we do not run ads. We take no government funds. We run on donations which average $25. If everyone reading this would donate $5 then this fund raiser would be done in an hour. If Drugs-Forum is useful to you, take one minute to keep it online another year by donating whatever you can today. Donations are currently not sufficient to pay our bills and keep the site up. Your help is most welcome. Thank you.
    PLEASE HELP

Stopping "Stop and Frisk" in New York City

Rating:
4.5/5,
  1. User-126494
    I want to make it very clear from this first line that I believe in safe streets, prosecuting crime, and in giving the New York Police Department and our criminal justice system the tools they need to do their jobs both effectively and constitutionally. Indeed, I have lived in Brooklyn, New York, New York City's largest borough, for two decades, and I am a community leader who works in neighborhoods where violence, mayhem, and crime are rampant.


    Yet the time has come to end New York's "stop and frisk" policy, as it is an arbitrary and unfair violation of an individual's right to privacy guaranteed by both the American and New York State constitutions.

    Furthermore, when these thousands of stops are combined, the disturbing result of stop and frisk is an amassing of the personal information of completely innocent people--mostly people of color--into a database utilized by the NYPD to assist them in identifying "future criminals."

    I know some will say this is an off-base accusation on my part. But not only am I speaking from detailed facts, but I am also speaking from personal experience. I too have been stopped and frisked, during my years in New York City, because, as I was told by one police office or another, "I fit a certain description" or "I was dressed the wrong way." Luckily I was never arrested after being stopped and frisked, but the harsh reality is that I could have been, as many are.

    And this is simply unacceptable in a nation that proclaims itself to be "post-racial" in the era of President Barack Obama.


    But what exactly is "stop and frisk?"

    Well, if you are stopped and frisked by the NYPD, your personal information is entered directly into a database for future use. It does not matter whether the officer found a gun on you or drugs of any sort. The officer has a bevy of options from which to choose his or her justification for your stop and frisk, all of which amount to little more than "you looked suspicious." If the officer wants your information entered into the database, he or she will get it entered into the database.

    In raw data provided by the Center for Constitutional Rights here in New York, 53,000 White people were stopped and frisked compared to 490,000 Blacks and Latinos. On the other hand, Blacks, Latinos, and Whites had almost exactly the same rate of arrest: six percent, according to a recent New York Times article: http://www.nytimes.com/2010/05/13/nyregion/13frisk.html?scp=2&sq=baker stop frisk data&st=cse

    That's a stop and frisk rate of more than nine people of color for every one White person. Or, from another perspective, 49,820 innocent White people were entered into the NYPD's database, compared to 460,600 innocent people of color. In 2009. Alone.

    Again, let me be perfectly clear. Effective policing is an absolutely critical part of keeping our communities strong and safe. As we have seen in the past right here in New York, a critical aspect of effective policing is a strong relationship between the NYPD and the communities it serves, regardless of the ethnicity, race, or religion of those communities. Not only does a police force interwoven into a community deter crime and provide positive role models for our children, such a force is far more effective at gathering evidence and solving crimes because neighborhoods communicate with police officers they trust. We want and need an effective police force in New York. We want and need a police force we can trust.

    For sure, an effective police force is not built by amassing the personal data of one community. The result is mistrust and hatred of a police force that applies those tactics in only some neighborhoods, as we've already seen in the Brownsville section of Brooklyn, where the NYPD has conducted 52,000 stops in just four years over a few city blocks: http://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/12/nyregion/12frisk.html?emc=eta1

    Yet, Mayor Bloomberg of New York City, and others, are pushing Governor Paterson to veto a bill on his desk now that attempts to reign in the NYPD's unfair application of stop and frisk to communities of color:
    http://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/03/nyregion/03frisk.html

    Advocates for the stop and frisk policy claim that both the procedure and the database are effective tools in helping them make our communities safer. As we've already seen with the data, 94% of the time stop and frisk is wrong, regardless of the racial category of the person involved. That's hardly effective.

    But even more disturbing is that our law enforcement believes that by gathering the personal information of every single person they've ever mistakenly stopped and frisked, they are closer to solving future crimes. They must actually believe these innocent citizens are future criminals. And the fact that the overwhelming majority of these citizens come from communities of color suggests a deep, deep rift between our police force (and some of our elected officials) and our communities, and a sincere and mistaken belief held by the NYPD that we who are Black and Latino will be committing 90% of the crimes in the future, based on this database.

    However, if the NYPD, again, simply looked at the arrest rate, 6% for Blacks, Latinos and Whites, it would see all it needs to know. We are people with rights. We believe in community. We work hard. We are the same, regardless of background, and all of us deserve basic civil and human rights.

    So let us find a way to deal with crime that does not take us back to the days of racial and ethnic segregation in America. That is not the America that elected Barack Obama president. Nor is that the America, or New York City, we need in the 21st century.


    Kevin Powell
    2010 Democratic candidate for Congress, Brooklyn
    Posted: July 15, 2010 09:41 AM
    HuffingtonPost.com


    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/kevin-powell/stopping-stop-and-frisk-i_b_647298.html

Comments

  1. Chemically Dependant
    Hey, whatever works. NYC used to have one of the highest murder rates in the country. Now small cities when compared to NYC have eclipsed the old murder rates. Take a look at Baltimore, Maryland a.k.a Bodymore Murderland. I wish they would do something like that there. All the bleeding heart liberals in the aclu should resign. There actually perpetuating the problem by letting these little thugs, murderer's, and animals run the street with no fear or remorse for the wrong their doing.
  2. Sven99
    Got any evidence that stop and search reduces murder rates? Any evidence that racially motivated stop and search more effectively reduces murder rates?
  3. Coconut
    There is a difference between trying to get everyone off the hook and defending rights and civil liberties. I am not American, nor do I reside in the US, but I have seen cases where the ACLU has done insurmountable good for the purpose of defending liberty in your country.

    Your animosity would be better directed at all defence lawyers.
  4. User-126494
    New York probably has a lower murder rate because the police make a visible presence in the city. The number of police has increased much over the years. Residents of the city have also taken steps to promote neighborhood watches, and people are typically more vigilant regarding what goes on around them and in their neighborhoods.

    SWIM lived in NYC and the area for almost 15 years and never had a problem just about any time of day or night in Manhattan, on the subway, Brooklyn or Staten Island. Likewise in Hoboken, NJ.

    Having the police visible and on patrol in areas does make a difference in reducing crime, also having those same officers get to know who lives in those neighborhoods and establish good relations with the people there. Not to treat the people badly, but to be there for the people. This means, not arresting the junkie passed out leaning against the building, but getting him to the hospital and medical treatment.

    SWIM has a lot of problems with the police in most police forces, however, in SWIM's experience the NYC police are friendly, courteous, and helpful for the most part. Changing the image of the police in NYC has gone a long way to help them be part of the community rather than hard-core jackbooted law enforcers with zero tolerance for anything. SWIM has even been arrested in NYC and was treated rather well by the arresting officers and officers in the precinct.

    SWIY may have a different opinion, but SWIM sees this as how NYC has been successful in reducing crime. NYC had a crime problem and it was one of the worst places to be, now it is one of the safest. It has all been through image management. The police have focused on "serious" crime and left mostly victimless criminal behavior alone, except when they have to make a periodic show of force.
  5. Chemically Dependant
    There on my list too. Bastards, swims friend was shot and killed during a drug deal it wasn't some small amount, but it was a truckload either. The shooter got off because of botched police work, and a Johnny Cocran (sp?) like defense lawyer.

    I'm sorry for my earlier rant, and if I offended anyone I apologize. This whole system needs a revamping.
To make a comment simply sign up and become a member!