1. Dear Drugs-Forum readers: We are a small non-profit that runs one of the most read drug information & addiction help websites in the world. We serve over 4 million readers per month, and have costs like all popular websites: servers, hosting, licenses and software. To protect our independence we do not run ads. We take no government funds. We run on donations which average $25. If everyone reading this would donate $5 then this fund raiser would be done in an hour. If Drugs-Forum is useful to you, take one minute to keep it online another year by donating whatever you can today. Donations are currently not sufficient to pay our bills and keep the site up. Your help is most welcome. Thank you.
    PLEASE HELP
  1. Joe-(5-HTP)
    Why is there this trend, this force, in 'stoner culture', to deny any harms of cannabis, especially its addictive potential? It essentially amounts to glorification, which no one who believes in harm reduction should tolerate.

    There are many reasons for this. Doubtless it is a reaction to the decades (bordering on centuries now) of slander hurled at Cannabis and its users by politicians and the religious right-wing. The now infamous 'reefer madness' (1936) propaganda hatchet job of a film claimed that Cannabis use led to violent crime and madness. The most popular argument today is the sheer incredulity anyone of sense has over Alcohol's relative harmfulness to Cannabis and yet their respective legal status' seeming to bear no relation to that reality. Defending this absurd status quo causes politicians today to continue spreading lies against cannabis. The ex-Prime minister of the UK Gordon Brown claimed that the 'skunk' variety of Cannabis was 'Lethal'. Hopefully a breaking point is reached sometime soon.

    Now I could easily understand why this systematic campaign of propaganda against cannabis by 'the system' would cause stoners to be a bit sensitive and touchy about any claims about the harms of cannabis. But Cannabis has harms. What has to be realised is that glorification is just as bad as exaggeration of harm, at least when it comes to the criteria of rationality. For sure, the consequences and despicable nature of the exaggeration has been worse than the glorification I want to talk about here. But they are equally inaccurate deviations from the truth. So when it comes to accurately portraying the harms of Cannabis, as any ideal future harm reduction based approach to drug use must strive towards - the glorification of stoner culture and the propaganda of the political class are simply two opposing extremes of the same spectrum. They are both lies. Lies told with very different intent, for very different reasons and with a malignant system of power behind one and a victimised culture of minorities behind the other - but both lies nonetheless.

    So I want to encourage people to realise that as drug users who believe in harm reduction, we should try to be better than the political class and other the other puritanical social classes who lied about the harms of Cannabis. We can be those who rationally accept the harms yet judge the benefits to outweigh them. That is the future. That is the attitude which will give us the best shot at legalizing too in my view.

    There's another reason I think there is this denialist force in stoner culture especially against admitting that Cannabis addiction is real. The reason is, I think, that they are addicts. It's a common theme that those who are addicted to something deny it if they can. "I've got my use under control" is a phrase we all know the true meaning of. Now for harder drugs than Cannabis, addiction very quickly becomes pathological and destructive to the addicts life. However the Cannabis addict can muddle on without the same level of interference. So the "I've got my use under control" illusion isn't brought to a crushing impact with rock-bottom-reality in the same way.

    This means that the denial can continue and spread. What I'm claiming then is that the belief in stoner culture that cannabis isn't addictive is actually a reflection at the cultural level of the addiction of its individuals. Once such a thing has gotten started, of course new addicts will gladly accept what is at this point essentially a fine-tuned excuse to use.

    So of course stoner culture doesn't believe in Cannabis addiction. Stoner culture in many ways is just a reflection of cannabis addiction, and the denialism that comes with any addiction.

    One final reason people give is that Cannabis addiction is not as bad as addiction to harder drugs and so it's somehow inaccurate or even insulting to addicts of harder drugs to suggest Cannabis is also addictive. This argument can be dealt with pretty swiftly. There is a spectrum of addictive potential and cannabis is simply less addictive and addiction to it is less harmful than addiction to harder drugs. There is no need to imply some sort of equality.

    So that's that! We should be open minded about the evidence of potential harms of Cannabis, including research into addiction. It's not going to curtail the legalization movement. Presenting ourselves as wanting policy to be based on actual data can only help us. This will involve accepting that Cannabis has some harms however.

    This means there is a fundamental incompatibility between harm reductionists and stoner glorifiers.

Comments

  1. aemetha
    I agree with everything you said here. I've seen it first hand, cannabis addiction can be every bit as crippling and have as serious consequences as any other addiction.

    My best friend in high school became addicted to cannabis. Every single time I've mentioned it people have told me "Oh you just didn't know him well enough, there was other stuff going on." Yeah he was depressed, and yeah he did hide it, but he wasn't depressed or hiding it before he became addicted to cannabis. He didn't have to work every hour of the day to pay for it before he became addicted. He didn't have massive debts he couldn't repay before he became addicted. The truth is cannabis led to his spiral that ultimately ended in his suicide. Any pleasurable activity can lead to addiction, and addiction can have serious consequences.

    Thank you for posting this. It's an unpopular view, but it is one that I subscribe to based on my personal observations.
  2. detoxin momma
    I happen to agree with you to joe. cannabis is no different than any other medication/drug. There will always be those who abuse.

    Under the right, or wrong, (depending on how you wanna look at things) circumstances, cannabis can be just as dangerous as other drugs.

    I have used cannabis regularly for 17 years, and last year, at the ripe age of 33, i self induced myself into cannabis psychosis. I do have "mentall illnesses" technically, but i believe it was from several days of insomnia and continuing to use marijuana.
    It took me 10 months of reading and contemplating every possibility to come to this conclusion.

    When i spoke with my psychiatrist after this "episode", he said to me, "you need to stop smoking weed, its the father that rapes you"....

    I didn't understand this analogy at first, but I do now. That means, you don't want to believe weed could do that to you.

    This event didn't deter me from using marijuana, but it definitely did give me alot more respect for the plant.

    good blog joe, I enjoy reading what you put out:vibes:
  3. Beenthere2Hippie
    Add me in on this one.

    Although I`m in a '"maijuana period" of my life currently (older, disabled in pain and legally on my red stats` medical cannabis list!), cannabis is no different in its nature to be or become addictive than any other substance that alters perspective.

    Thank you for this smart offering, Sir Joe. I believe you are more than a lttle onto something. ;)
  4. hunterhoffman
    I completely agree. I think that cannabis is most definitely addictive; and as far as the "equality" of drug addictions is concerned, although cannabis is less of an obvious addiction (compared to, for example, cocaine or methamphetamine), I personally believe that the ritualistic side of cannabis use (namely the smoking ROA; rolling a joint, packing a bowl, grinding your buds) is one of the most addictive acts of drug administration. Of course prepping a shot or racking up a line is an addictive habit, but for me (and a lot of people I know) there's just something about packing a bowl and hitting it, or rolling a zoot, sparking it up and passing it, that is almost irresistible.
    I used to smoke extremely large quantities of cannabis every day, and even though ai rarely smoke these days (unless my seizures are serious), I still sometimes smoke tobacco bongs just so I can pull out the bowl, exhale a fat cloud and feel satisfied, as do many people I know.

    I tweaked out for weed once, mid-last year, to the point where I was seriously tempted to purchase some RC smoking blends to feel stoned, even though I absolutely depise them. I found a nug in my vaporizer and felt no different than I've ever felt when I've found a good bit of smack resin in an old toot.

    I completely agree with you Joe when you say that stating the facts in a realistic, rather an idealistic, fashion will push u closer than towards legalisation than hiding the facts and telling just plain lies will ever get us.
    Great post, found it very encouraging to see that not all cannabis users are in denial about the realities of the harms.
To make a comment simply sign up and become a member!