1. Dear Drugs-Forum readers: We are a small non-profit that runs one of the most read drug information & addiction help websites in the world. We serve over 4 million readers per month, and have costs like all popular websites: servers, hosting, licenses and software. To protect our independence we do not run ads. We take no government funds. We run on donations which average $25. If everyone reading this would donate $5 then this fund raiser would be done in an hour. If Drugs-Forum is useful to you, take one minute to keep it online another year by donating whatever you can today. Donations are currently not sufficient to pay our bills and keep the site up. Your help is most welcome. Thank you.

Tobacco plain packaging law takes another step towards reality

By aemetha, Aug 24, 2016 | |
  1. aemetha
    Plain packaging for cigarettes has taken another step towards reality, despite suggestions that manufacturers and retailers should be given more time to sell their old stock.

    The Smoke-free Environments (Tobacco Plain Packaging) Amendment Bill is heading to its third and final reading at Parliament, after passing the committee stage by 108 votes to 13 on Wednesday morning. The law would make it illegal for tobacco companies to print any branding on cigarette boxes, only allowing the name in small plain type with graphic warnings about the risks of smoking.

    NZ First MP Barbara Stewart accused the Government of rushing through the change, saying the transition period for retailers and manufacturers to replace their old stocks should be extended from 12 weeks to six months. "The bottom line is that 12 weeks is not sufficient to basically get rid of all your old stock and sell it on," she said. "No doubt the minister would be very happy when some of these ram raids [by thieves] are carried out, because then all of the [branded] cigarettes and all of the tobacco is taken by these people." Stewart said although the bill had been introduced three years ago, a date had never been set for the law change.

    Labour health spokesman Chris Hipkins took issue with Stewart's stance and showed less sympathy for business owners.


    Hipkins said the burden and cost of the plain packaging bill would fall on the tobacco industry. "It is an industry entirely without conscience and entirely without any moral compass. This is an industry that sets out to kill its customers. "I have to say to the members opposite that they should search deeply within themselves to find their own moral conscience." Hipkins argued against Stewart's support of business owners and said businesses had known about the law change since 2013 and "had plenty of time to prepare". "The cost will predominantly fall on the tobacco companies whose job, as I've said, is to kill people. That is what they set out to do."

    24 August 2016
    Rachel Clayton


To make a comment simply sign up and become a member!