1. Dear Drugs-Forum readers: We are a small non-profit that runs one of the most read drug information & addiction help websites in the world. We serve over 4 million readers per month, and have costs like all popular websites: servers, hosting, licenses and software. To protect our independence we do not run ads. We take no government funds. We run on donations which average $25. If everyone reading this would donate $5 then this fund raiser would be done in an hour. If Drugs-Forum is useful to you, take one minute to keep it online another year by donating whatever you can today. Donations are currently not sufficient to pay our bills and keep the site up. Your help is most welcome. Thank you.

US drug czar: Why we need to end 'War on Drugs'

  1. Balzafire
    Drug use affects the lives of millions of people and contributes to many of the other challenges our Nation faces - from public health and safety to economic stability, military preparedness, and quality education for America's young people.

    While drug use and its consequences affect every community in this country, African-American communities have been among the hardest hit. These consequences include public health problems arising from drug use, children who become part of the child welfare system, and those who become victims of drug-related crime, among other issues.

    At the same time, African-American communities and leaders have long been leading voices in the call for a more balanced national drug policy, as earnest and consistent critics of a policy approach that relied too heavily on the criminal justice system to address a multi-faceted drug problem.

    Shortly after my confirmation by the Senate as Director of National Drug Control Policy, I said the time had come to retire the phrase "War on Drugs," and to address drug use not only as a public safety issue, but also as an issue of public health.

    Our drug control policy must be fair, and must be flexible enough to address the evolving drug issues we face. Overdose deaths have more than doubled over the last 10 years, now exceeding automobile fatalities as the number one cause of injury death in 16 states.

    Prescription drug abuse is at record levels. In 10 states, drugged driving is more prevalent than drunken driving. And recent data show troubling signs among youth of increased use of some drugs, and softening attitudes toward drug use.

    ONDCP is committed to pursuing evidence-based policies grounded in objective facts and data, which can help counter harmful racial stereotypes. For instance, 85 percent of Federal crack cocaine defendants are African-American, and the existing mandatory minimum disparity between crack and powder cocaine cannot be justified based on pharmacological differences.

    This administration is actively working with Congress to promote equity in penalties for cocaine-related crimes, while retaining the tools needed by law enforcement to protect communities from the violence associated with drug trafficking. There's an obvious incentive to change laws with disproportionate racial impact, but an additional benefit to promoting equitable sentencing is that it will increase the public's confidence in our criminal justice system. That confidence is critical, because the criminal justice system has an important role to play in a balanced approach to the drug problem.

    In May, President Obama announced this administration's 2010 National Drug Control Strategy, a comprehensive and balanced plan built upon the experience and insights of people who deal with drug issues on a daily basis across this nation.

    This new approach to the effort to curb drug use and its consequences is grounded in three basic truths:

    Drug use takes a terrible toll on public health, and requires a public health policy response on the same scale as our public safety response to the issue. The U.S. public health and healthcare systems need to assume a larger role in addressing drug use, and addiction treatment programs need to be integrated into mainstream medicine.

    Because the drug problem stems primarily from drug use within the United States, effective drug policy must begin at home. We must and will continue multi-national, collaborative efforts to reduce the international production and trafficking of drugs. But we must also realize that the most promising solution to the U.S. drug problem starts right here: in curbing our enormous demand for drugs.

    We now have an unprecedented number of scientifically evaluated tools and best practices to use in response to the drug problem. Evidence-based policing programs can disrupt drug markets. Prevention research has shown us how communities can more effectively protect their young people from substance use, and advances in pharmaceutical and psychological treatment offer new hope to those struggling with the disease of addiction.

    Our overall anti-drug budget requests over $15 billion for prevention, treatment, research, law enforcement, interdiction, and international support. The president's FY 2011 Budget request proposes increasing our prevention budget by more than 13 percent and our treatment budget by more than 3 percent, while maintaining strong support for law enforcement.

    Additionally, the Obama administration's drug control budget would devote significant resources for law enforcement actions against drug traffickers, for community-oriented policing, protecting public lands from illicit drug cultivation, and for reinforcing our borders with stepped-up drug interdiction.

    With this new strategy and added resources, we will be better able to intervene early once substance abuse has started, to treat cases of abuse and dependence, to reduce drug-related crime, promote recovery from addiction, and to enhance our domestic border control, community and enforcement efforts to disrupt drug production, sales and trafficking.

    This is our strategy. This is our blueprint for action. Together, we can work to reduce the human suffering caused by drug use and its consequences, and create a safer, healthier nation.

    By R. Gil Kerlikowske
    8:04 AM on 07/13/2010


  1. Balzafire

    [SIZE=+1]R. Gil Kerlikowske is:[/SIZE]
    [SIZE=+1]Director [/SIZE]
    [SIZE=+1]White House Office of National Drug Control Policy[/SIZE]
    R. Gil Kerlikowske was nominated by President Obama and confirmed by the U.S. Senate as the Director of the Office of National Drug Control Policy. He was sworn in on May 7, 2009, as the Nation's sixth "Drug Czar." In his position, Mr. Kerlikowske coordinates all aspects of Federal drug control programs and implementation of the President's National Drug Control Strategy.
    Mr. Kerlikowske brings 37 years of law enforcement and drug policy experience to the position. He most recently served 9 years as the Chief of Police for Seattle, Washington. When he left, crime was at its lowest point in 40 years. Previously, he was Deputy Director for the U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Community Oriented Policing Services, where he was responsible for over 6 billion dollars in Federal assets. Mr. Kerlikowske was also Police Commissioner of Buffalo, New York. The majority of his law enforcement career was in Florida where he served in the St. Petersburg Police Department and later as Chief of Police in Port St. Lucie and Fort Pierce.
    He was elected twice to be President of the Major Cities Chiefs, which is comprised of the largest city and county law enforcement agencies in the United States and Canada, and was also elected President of the Police Executive Research Forum. He has received numerous awards and recognition for leadership, innovation, and community service. He served in the U.S. Army where he was awarded the Presidential Service Badge.
    He served as the Chair of the Board of Directors of Fight Crime: Invest in Kids, a national organization that advocates for evidence-based programs that prevent youth from being involved in crime. He has also served on the advisory boards of the Salvation Army in Buffalo and Seattle, feeding the hungry and helping the homeless.
    Mr. Kerlikowske holds a B.A. and M.A. in criminal justice from the University of South Florida in Tampa, and is a graduate of the F.B.I. National Executive Institute in Quantico, Virginia.
  2. steez
    Soooo their plan to end the "war on drugs" is to continue fighting it with slightly different tactics?
  3. Nacumen
    Saying "we'll end the war on drugs!" while not legitimizing use and distribution is petty politcal pandering. The only way to stop the real drug wars in America's neighborhoods and along Mexico's border is to remove the financial incentive for cartels to wage war.
  4. Terrapinzflyer
    While it may not be the right answer, at least its a step in the right direction. I came of age in the Reagan/Bush (senior) years- head shops and waterpipe companies put out of business right and left, the beginning of use of armored vehicles and military style police raids, mandatory minimums...all the while the goverment is wheeling and dealing cocaine and arms (Iran/Contra).

    We still have a long way to go, but things are generally getting better, not worse...

    And I lived in Seattle during Kerlikowski's reign- and by and large things moved in a better direction with him heading the police...
To make a comment simply sign up and become a member!