1. Dear Drugs-Forum readers: We are a small non-profit that runs one of the most read drug information & addiction help websites in the world. We serve over 4 million readers per month, and have costs like all popular websites: servers, hosting, licenses and software. To protect our independence we do not run ads. We take no government funds. We run on donations which average $25. If everyone reading this would donate $5 then this fund raiser would be done in an hour. If Drugs-Forum is useful to you, take one minute to keep it online another year by donating whatever you can today. Donations are currently not sufficient to pay our bills and keep the site up. Your help is most welcome. Thank you.
    PLEASE HELP

Utah judge condemns sentencing laws, give

  1. nikonikad
    Utah judge condemns sentencing laws, gives drug offender 55 years

    Paul Foy THE ASSOCIATED PRESS


    SALT LAKE CITY -- A judge who condemned federal sentencing laws as "unjust, cruel and irrational" said Tuesday he had little choice but to sentence a first-time drug offender to 55 years and one day in prison.

    U.S. District Judge Paul Cassell gave record producer Weldon Angelos the minimum 55 years for carrying a gun and one day for dealing marijuana and money laundering.

    Cassell said Angelos will serve more time than rapists, murderers or airline hijackers.

    The courtroom was packed with Angelos's family, friends and supporters for what promised to be a dramatic sentencing.

    Cassell made an impassioned speech against draconian sentencing laws and appeared ready to defy them, but "he wasn't willing to step out of his role to be a lawmaker," said University of Utah criminal law professor Erik Luna.

    "I'm disappointed the judge didn't go the extra step," said Angelos' attorney, Jerry Mooney.

    Cassell said Angelos, 25, could have gotten another 78 months under sentencing guidelines, but the judge imposed the minimum. Angelos's lawyer plans to appeal. If that's unsuccessful, Angelos won't be eligible for release until he's 70, the judge said.

    In his reluctant ruling, Cassell said he would call on President Bush to commute Angelos's sentence and Congress to change sentencing laws for drug offenders.

    "This is the most difficult case I've decided since I took the bench two and a half years ago," Cassell said.

    Angelos could have gotten up to eight years for the marijuana sales and money laundering offenses. Carrying a gun while committing the crimes piled on 55 more years.

    Before trial, Angelos was offered a plea bargain with a 16-year sentence, but he strongly denied carrying a gun outside his home during three alleged drug transactions. That testimony came from an informant "of some disreputable background," Mooney said.

    A jury exonerated Angelos of two other gun charges but convicted him of twice wearing a gun in an ankle holster and once carrying it in a briefcase. Angelos maintained the guns never left his home, where he kept them in a safe.

    Prosecutor Robert Lunt said Angelos had been suspected of drug trafficking and money laundering for years and got what he deserved.

    Last year's trial made news when the witness list included Snoop Dogg and other artists who had worked with Angelos, but Bad Azz was the only big name artist who ended up testifying. The defense argued Angelos made money legally through his work, while prosecutors claimed he used drug money to finance his music business, Extravagant Records.

    On Tuesday, Lunt contended Angelos "habitually armed himself" and that his conviction stopped him from using it.

    The stiff sentence was a deterrent: Utah gang leaders have told Lunt and other prosecutor that the Angelos case persuaded them to stop carrying guns, he said.

    A group called Family Against Mandatory Minimum held signs protesting outside the courtroom, where Mooney cautioned them to blame Congress, not the judge.

    A spokeswoman for U.S. Attorney Paul Warner criticized Cassell for making an issue of the laws at a sentencing.

Comments

  1. white_lighter
    man bush is fucking us all over and i knew snoop was a snitch
  2. Veteran Joker
    Snoops scared, because he can so easily be made into a scapegoat. He didn't use the SWIM defense.
  3. Broshious
    For carrying a gun(I'm assuming it was unregistered) you should get in big trouble.
  4. grandbaby
    He tried, but the judge didn't know what he meant by "SWIZzle".
  5. fnord
    quote: For carrying a gun(I'm assuming it was unregistered) you should get in big trouble.

    thats a matter of opinon swims never shot a gun in his life,nor will he,yet that dosent mean he dosent belive everyone should be armed and that registering guns is a silly idea.
  6. stoneinfocus
    That´s just artificially driving up the sentence, ... I don´t think someone in this business has an unregistred gun ( at least not the way it could be found by cops), but I do believe, that someon elike Snoop et al. likes to have a registerd gun around.

    So, e.g. if I was raided and a gun was found and someone said, I was selling MJ or drugs, they could eventually make it look like I was a big thread to society, armed and willing to shot someone, getting into the way while delivering pot to Snoop -come-on, that´s just ridiculous, another black man or black supporting man that´s getting life time, for some weed??? what´s that ?
  7. Broshious
    Why is registering guns silly?
To make a comment simply sign up and become a member!