1. Dear Drugs-Forum readers: We are a small non-profit that runs one of the most read drug information & addiction help websites in the world. We serve over 4 million readers per month, and have costs like all popular websites: servers, hosting, licenses and software. To protect our independence we do not run ads. We take no government funds. We run on donations which average $25. If everyone reading this would donate $5 then this fund raiser would be done in an hour. If Drugs-Forum is useful to you, take one minute to keep it online another year by donating whatever you can today. Donations are currently not sufficient to pay our bills and keep the site up. Your help is most welcome. Thank you.
    PLEASE HELP
  1. Greenport
    Will Pentagon Ban Tobacco Use in the Military?[IMGR="white"]http://www.drugs-forum.com/photopost/data/502/image4795548x.jpg[/IMGR]
    Posted by Prerana Swarmi

    Health experts at the Pentagon want a ban on the sale and use of tobacco in the military, USA Today reports.

    A study commissioned by the Pentagon and Veteran Affairs recommends banning the product in phases over the next several years. Additionally, it suggests that “achieving a tobacco-free military begins by closing the pipeline of new tobacco users entering the military and by promoting cessation programs to ensure abstinence” – which means requiring all enlisting members to be tobacco-free, Army.com reports.

    As the head of the Pentagon’s office of clinical and program policy, Jack Smith told USA Today that he will be urging Defense Secretary Robert Gates to adopt the proposals set forth by the study. It finds that tobacco use costs the Pentagon nearly $846 million each year. $6 billion is spent by the Department of Veteran Affairs on treating tobacco-related illnesses as well.

    The Pentagon requested the study in 2007, according to Army.com. It found one in three service members currently use tobacco products, and that the heaviest smokers are in the Army and Marines. The study also found that tobacco use has risen since the start of the Afghanistan and Iraq wars, suggesting a direct correlation between combat and tobacco use.

    Heavy smoking has been part of military culture for years. “The image of the battle-weary soldier in fatigues and helmet, fighting for his country, has frequently included his lit cigarette,” the study says. A ban would mean fewer such associations, possibly changing the culture altogether, the study suggests.

    Although tobacco use in the military is not encouraged, anti-tobacco advocate Kenneth Kizer told USA Today that such products are subsidized for troops. Much of the profits from their sale to troops go to recreation and family support programs.

    If the proposals are adopted, tobacco products will not be sold at military commissaries. In addition, tobacco use would be banned on military property and tobacco use would be treated similarly to alcohol abuse and poor fitness, according to Army.com.

    http://www.cbsnews.com/blogs/2009/07/10/politics/politicalhotsheet/entry5150763.shtml

Comments

  1. EscapeDummy
    Jeez, I always thought the military would be the last bastion of tobacco use in America. With the recent Tobacco bill, and now this, it looks like the tobacco lobby has really lost a ton of power recently.
  2. Greenport
    Yeah I disagree with this...our armed forces work to protect this country and they're going to ban one of the perhaps two things that might help to keep them sane after a day's work?

    If they want to smoke a fag let them! Damn the health consequences it's their choice and they are the ones fighting for our country.

    I sure wouldn't stand up for seeing people getting kicked out of the military for smoking.
To make a comment simply sign up and become a member!