1. Dear Drugs-Forum readers: We are a small non-profit that runs one of the most read drug information & addiction help websites in the world. We serve over 4 million readers per month, and have costs like all popular websites: servers, hosting, licenses and software. To protect our independence we do not run ads. We take no government funds. We run on donations which average $25. If everyone reading this would donate $5 then this fund raiser would be done in an hour. If Drugs-Forum is useful to you, take one minute to keep it online another year by donating whatever you can today. Donations are currently not sufficient to pay our bills and keep the site up. Your help is most welcome. Thank you.
    PLEASE HELP

WPF Hallucinogens or Lucidogens? The Debate is Open

By moda00, Apr 3, 2008 | |
Rating:
3/5,
  1. moda00
    Hallucinogens vs. Lucidogens: The Debate is Open
    Juan C. Gonzalez, PhD
    www.categorizacion.org (Spanish)
    http://hallucinations.risc.cnrs.fr (French, short section is English if you click English content)
    "Rising Researchers" March 23, 2008 Basel

    What issues are at stake?
    Conceptual issues (not only terminology)
    Epistemological issues
    Mental health issues
    Socio-political issues
    Religious/spiritual issues
    Legal issues

    "Hallucinogen" as a standard term
    Contextualized in cognitive science and philosophy

    Overview:
    1. Analysis of "hallucinogen" (negative and positive claims)
    2. Question: Can some be classified as "lucidogens?"

    Charles Duits- French writer- ate peyote in 1956 (1969)- commented that it produced purification of senses, satisfaction, increased strength, increased vitality, flexibility, health
    Terms peyote as a Lucidogen

    What is a Hallucinogen? "A substance that induces hallucinations"
    What is a hallucination? "A perception that is unfounded, mistaken, or deluded; a perception that is not linked to reality"
    What is a Lucidogen? A consciousness or cognition inducing/enhancing (vs. Hallucinogen, see above- often perceived negative connotation)

    Negative claim- No realistic concept of hallucination (false perception of perception with with no object or objective reality for its basis) can simultaneously satisfy these requirements:

    1. Reliability condition ("A physically and mentally sound and otherwise reliable subject...")
    2. Delusional condition ("...who claims to or shows that they are perceiving something that is not there...")
    3. Background condition (but other vision and behavior remains the same except those directly involved with the hallucination)
    4. Critical condition (self/others subject to) (?)
    Negative claim is that any account of these 4 things occurring simultaneously (as a hallucination by definition) is inaccurate

    Positive claim: Four senses- not mutually exclusive:

    a) Profane or mystical state, visions, modified inner state- can overlap or coexist with ordinary states (substance induced or other causes)
    b) Endogenous visions and other states that have a dreamlike quality (ex. Salvia)
    c) Hyper-perception- states whose cognitive scope reaches beyond ordinary objects or contents of perceptual consciousness
    d) Perceptual distortions and visual phenomenon, effects within visual field but still in contact with the world and objects in it (ex. some visual phenomenon of LSD or mushrooms)

    Can we say some substances or uses can be classified as Lucidogens or Lucidogenic use?
    YES. In situations "a" and "c" above especially/particularly

    Term depends on the situation at hand- detailed and specific considerations for determination- but Lucidogen is very often appropriate
    Opinion that only plant that induces true hallucinations in the classic sense something like Datura

    If one must choose one or the other for whatever reason, rather than judging on specific use/substance/circumstance/effects, data and analysis seem to support "Lucidogen" as the preferred term

Comments

To make a comment simply sign up and become a member!