1. Dear Drugs-Forum readers: We are a small non-profit that runs one of the most read drug information & addiction help websites in the world. We serve over 4 million readers per month, and have costs like all popular websites: servers, hosting, licenses and software. To protect our independence we do not run ads. We take no government funds. We run on donations which average $25. If everyone reading this would donate $5 then this fund raiser would be done in an hour. If Drugs-Forum is useful to you, take one minute to keep it online another year by donating whatever you can today. Donations are currently not sufficient to pay our bills and keep the site up. Your help is most welcome. Thank you.
  1. Beenthere2Hippie
    A 21-year-old woman in the small town of Hawley, Pennsylvania is facing life in prison for selling heroin to a person who then died of an overdose. Brittany Ann Banscher is being charged under a new initiative that’s aggressively targeting heroin trafficking in Pennsylvania. It’s part of a growing number of states that are using “drug dealer liability” or “death by delivery” laws to stringently punish drug dealers. An earlier version of Pennsylvania’s law was ruled unconstitutional by the state Supreme Court.

    The Pocono Record reports that Banscher was indicted Tuesday by a federal grand jury in Scranton, charged with “knowingly and intentionally” possessing heroin with intent to distribute, “resulting in the death of another person.” She faces up to life in prison and $1,000 in fines, and separately is facing more charges of possession with intent to distribute, which would carry another maximum of 20 years.

    Banscher’s arrest is part of a broad swath of aggressive prosecutions of people in Pennsylvania accused of selling heroin and fentanyl. In August, a Scranton man was also charged with “drug distribution resulting in death” for selling fentanyl to a pregnant woman. He faces a maximum of 40 years because the sale occurred within 1,000 feet of a daycare center with an outdoor playground, considered a “protected area,” where potential penalties are doubled.

    Alternet reported last year the “drug dealer liability” laws are a popular new tool for law enforcement, though critics argue the laws are on shaky legal ground in holding the alleged dealer directly responsible for another person’s death:

    Many legal experts and justice advocates argue that these drug death prosecutions are not only unfair, but probably unconstitutional. As Rutgers University law professor Douglas Husak put it: “Heroin distributors are not murderers, and they’re not murderers when their customers die from an overdose.”

    The National Criminal Justice Reference Service agreed in its harshly critical report on the practice, Unconstitutional Fiction. “Regardless of the felony committed by a drug supplier, the act of supplying the drug does not legally cause a user’s overdose and death,” the NCJRS found.”Courts that use the rule [felony murder in drug prosecutions] violate the accused’s constitutional guarantee of due process of law by failing to prove the causation of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt.”​

    Thus far, Alternet reported at the time, California, Florida, Illinois, Kentucky, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Massachusetts, Michigan, Missouri, Tennessee, Virginia and Washington have all enacted some form of a drug dealer liability law in the past two decades.

    In Pennsylvania, the first version of the law was overturned in the 1997 case of Gloria Highhawk, who injected a man named Steve Wilson, who was quadriplegic, with heroin at his request. Wilson became unresponsive and died soon after of “acute heroin toxicity.”

    The updated version of the “death by delivery” law, passed in 2011, doesn’t require the prosecution to prove that the alleged dealer acted with “malice” in selling the drugs, only that they were “knowingly delivered,” Assistant District Attorney Matt Weintraub told Levittown Now at the time. The cases were still often difficult to prove, he added: “We still need to prove that the delivered drugs were the drugs that killed. Sometimes it’s hard to establish that chain.”

    Other states are also increasingly used liability or “death by delivery” laws, beginning around 2013.

    “We’re going to be ruthless,” prosecutor Joseph Coronato of Ocean County, New Jersey told the Associated Press at the time.

    “We’re looking for long-term prison sentences.”

    By Anna Merian - Jezebel/Sept. 2, 2016
    Art: bareng.tk
    Newshawk Crew

    Author Bio

    BT2H is a retired news editor and writer from the NYC area who, for health reasons, retired to a southern US state early, and where BT2H continues to write and to post drug-related news to DF.


  1. hunterhoffman
    I think this is a ridiculous and hypocritical excuse for a law. The reason people die of drug overdoses is either
    A) the dealer sells fake/dodgy/mixed/intentionally or unintentionally mislabelled substances to the user
    B) the naivety of the user
    C) the irresponsibility of the user

    How is attempting to lock up a many low level dealers as possible supposedly going to do anything to cut down on the number of drugs being sold and drig related deaths?
    They're just cutting down thr competition for other dealers.
    What needs to happen is the decriminalisation/legalisation of all drugs, but seeing as that isn't going to happen anytime in the foreseeable future, at the very least there needs to be more comprehensive and realistic drug education in ALL schools, instead of this "drugs are bad" bullshit. Harm reduction is thrown out the window to make way for political agendas.

    Legalisation would lead to clean and safer drugs, keep the money out of the hands of the cartels and the black market, and ensure that people didn't have to get mixed up with dangerous people just to get drugs.

    Honest, unbiased and non judgemental drug education would lead to less naivety and, in turn, less irresponsible use. Maybe Alfa could run it lol.

    I think it's only fair that for every person in the states following these laws who dies of an alcohol overdose, the person who sold them alcohol should face these same charges, but that is obviously never going to happen.
    It's just another chapter in the bizarre war on freedom.
  2. mastermind22
    Nothing to say but strongly agree with hunterhoffman.
  3. Beenthere2Hippie
    It is a crazy law but no crazier than the original US crack cocaine, and mandatory minimum laws enacted back as early as 1987, laws that reflect this type of "we'll get them" thinking and actions that help no one and harm many.

    I've attached a Chrome pdf that anyone shocked and wondering about cases like this may find of interest.
To make a comment simply sign up and become a member!