1. Dear Drugs-Forum readers: We are a small non-profit that runs one of the most read drug information & addiction help websites in the world. We serve over 4 million readers per month, and have costs like all popular websites: servers, hosting, licenses and software. To protect our independence we do not run ads. We take no government funds. We run on donations which average $25. If everyone reading this would donate $5 then this fund raiser would be done in an hour. If Drugs-Forum is useful to you, take one minute to keep it online another year by donating whatever you can today. Donations are currently not sufficient to pay our bills and keep the site up. Your help is most welcome. Thank you.

Buying ‘legal’ recreational drugs does not mean that you are not breaking the law

Buying ‘legal’ recreational drugs does not mean that you are not breaking the law

  1. Anonymous
    QJM. 2010 Jul 30.
    Ramsey J, Dargan PI, Smyllie M, Davies S, Button J, Holt DW, Wood DM.
    PMID: 20675395

    Background: Recreational drug use in the UK is
    common; sources of recreational drugs are changing, with increasing purchase of legal highs from the Internet. Previous studies have shown that there is not consistency of active ingredient(s) in legal highs purchased from the Internet.

    Aim: The aim of this study was to determine the
    impact of the 16 April 2010 change to the Misuse
    of Drugs Act (1971) on the content of ‘legal highs
    purchased over the Internet and supplied within the UK.

    Methods: Legal highs were purchased from a
    number of different Internet suppliers and the
    active ingredients determined by analysis undertaken within a Home Office approved and licensed laboratory set in a UK academic institution. The active ingredient(s) detected on screening were then compared to the UK legislation in force at the time of purchase to determine whether each individual ‘legal’ high was in fact legal or not.

    Results: All 18 products purchased prior to the
    change in the UK legislation contained active ingredients that were legal under the Misuse of Drugs Act (1971) in force at that time. Six products were purchased and analysed after the changes to the UK Misuse of Drugs Act (1971) on the 16 April 2010. Five of the products contained information, either on the Internet site or the packaging, stating that the product contained legal substances; the final product did not specify the active ingredient and so purchasers would be unable to determine if this was truly a legal product. Five of the six products contained
    an active ingredient that is a Class B drug
    under the Misuse of Drugs Act (1971); the other
    product contained an unlicensed medicine not controlled under the Misuse of Drugs Act (1971).

    Conclusions: We have shown in this study that some drugs sold as ‘legal’ highs contain drugs that are controlled under the Misuse of Drugs Act (1971). Under current UK legislation, individuals purchasing legal highs that contained controlled drugs would be subject to the same penalties as if they had knowingly purchased a controlled drug.
    Dissemination of information on the harm associated with the use of legal highs should also
    inform individuals that they may be purchasing controlled substances and the potential legal consequences of this.