ALMOST laughed but now confused...wtf!?

Discussion in 'Amphetamine' started by brandonBOYDrox, Jun 7, 2005.

  1. brandonBOYDrox

    brandonBOYDrox Silver Member

    Reputation Points:
    5
    Messages:
    52
    Joined:
    May 31, 2005
    31 y/o
    "Meth is highly toxic; with chronic use, the user’s body essentially burns itself up."



    i found it when i was tryin to figure out the actual # of deaths from meth. hmmmmmmm.....this has got to be the most overexaggerated statement made to scare people.


    maybe its true? i mean i don't know about any of you guys but i have never heard of any meth addicts dying from spontaneous combustion...how about ya'll?
     
    Last edited by a moderator: May 14, 2012
  2. Motorhead

    Motorhead Platinum Member & Advisor

    Reputation Points:
    988
    Messages:
    1,126
    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2005
    44 y/o from Canada
    I dont think they were talking about the scientifically unprovenphenomenon of 'spontaneous combustion', wherein people suddenly burst into flames. I think they were just trying to say that, with most hard drugs, prolonged abuse takes a severe toll on the human body. I think the biggest line of BS on the page is when they say meth is easy to produce. lol look around this forum and you will agree this isnt true.
     
  3. brandonBOYDrox

    brandonBOYDrox Silver Member

    Reputation Points:
    5
    Messages:
    52
    Joined:
    May 31, 2005
    31 y/o
    lol yeah i didn't really think itmeant cause spontaneous combustion...just the first thing that came to mind.


    damn i didn't even notice that one...if it were so easy I would be makin an oz for $100 instead of buyin a g for $80!
     
  4. Muirner

    Muirner Gold Member

    Reputation Points:
    38
    Messages:
    983
    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2005
    from U.K.
    As for the toxic part i honsetly have no idea. But taking a spin off of the burning the body up, i can interperate that. What if they are talking about the meth binges that people go on where they can be up for a few days to a week just doing meth to keep them going. This is very hard on the body, thus causing the body to work harder at the things that were once easy. This in turn will burn you up.

    Maybe this isnt how they wanted it said but that's my take on it.


    Muirner
     
  5. radiometer

    radiometer bananadine addict Platinum Member & Advisor

    Reputation Points:
    3,376
    Messages:
    3,273
    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2005
    from U.S.A.
    I'd also imagine that not eating for several days in a row would cause the
    body to, in layman's terms, "essentially burn itself up".
     
  6. brandonBOYDrox

    brandonBOYDrox Silver Member

    Reputation Points:
    5
    Messages:
    52
    Joined:
    May 31, 2005
    31 y/o
    yeah that makes sense... probably what they meant



    it's just funny that even if that's what they really meant, they try to
    use the most horrible diction to twist it even a little bit. i can
    imagine a kid reading that and getting the idea that your body would
    actually "burn up"



    but i guess thats their goal
     
  7. Muirner

    Muirner Gold Member

    Reputation Points:
    38
    Messages:
    983
    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2005
    from U.K.
    propaganda works in fucked up ways. It is stupid how that goes down, but did you see the link that someone posted, i saw it last night it was the wierdest site that i've seen. It had all these people who were dead from drugs or, killed themselfs, it had a marijuana section, psychadelics section, coke and amph's. etc, i cant find the link i'll look around


    Muirner
     
Tags: