Drug info - AMT Effects and Ratings Survey Results

Discussion in 'Tryptamines' started by illuminati boy, Apr 8, 2006.

  1. illuminati boy

    illuminati boy Gold Member

    Reputation Points:
    989
    Messages:
    159
    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2005
    Attached should be a zipped file with 5 files in it that contain the data on AMT gathered from the recent survey project on largely unresearched compounds.

    General information about the survey project on largely unresearched compounds.

    This project consisted of posting 28 surveys for about 60 days at 6 different internet discussion boards. 25 of the surveys received at least one response in that time. There were a total of 701 responses to all of the surveys with 5-MeO-DPT receiving the fewest responses (2) and 2C-I receiving the most (123). 11 surveys received 25 or more responses and probably give a somewhat reliable overview of the compounds in question.
    There are 3 different types of surveys. The Phenethylamines, the Tryptamines, and the DOB-DFLY survey. The phenethylamine and tryptamine surveys are almost identically with 2 exceptions; the tryptamine surveys have an additional item labeled x01 and a freeform response at the end. The DOB-DFLY survey has numerous additional sections etc. due to it being a later addition. Despite these differences, each subsection should allow for apples to apples comparisons. The only real difference in the data might be a slightly higher skip rate on section 5 with regard to the phenethylamines, though looking at the actual data the difference appears to be minimal if any.

    What was looked at across all surveys was 1. What people thought of the compound overall, 2. What people thought about the general pleasurableness of the compound, 3. What people thought about the general stimulant/sedative tendencies of the compound, 4. What people reported in the way of ‘primary effects,’ 5. What people reported in the way of ‘side effects,’ and 6. The number of times people reported taking a given compound.

    For items 1, 2, & 3 a ‘score’ can be worked out.

    For the overall rating one can either calculate the % of persons that consider the compound ‘worthwhile’ by adding the number of persons reporting ‘B,’ ‘A,’ and ‘A+’ and dividing by the total number of persons answering that item; or one can calculate an ‘average rating’ by giving a score of 6 to every ‘A+,’ 5 to every ‘A,’ 4 to every ‘B,’ 3 to every ‘C,’ 2 to every ‘D,’ 1 to every ‘E,’ and 0 to every ‘F’ (the results then divided by the number of total respondents).

    For the overall pleasure direction one simply assigns a weighted score to the responses according to the value to the left (i.e. +3, +2, +1, 0, -1, -2, -3) and divides by the total number of responses. A net positive score indicates a compound that is reportedly more positive and a net negative score indicates a compound that is reportedly more negative. A score close to or at 0 indicates a compound that is not very particularly prone one way or another with regard to pleasurable experiences (it could have no discernable ‘push’ or it could be equally prone toward pleasurable or disconcerting experiences).

    The overall energy direction is calculated much the same as the overall pleasure direction, with the difference being that the results will show the overall tendency of the compound toward stimulation or sedation. If the net score is positive it indicates a trend toward stimulation, if the net score is negative it indicates a trend toward sedation. If the score is close to or at 0 it indicates that a compound is not particularly prone toward one direction or the other (this could mean neither stimulation nor sedation or it could indicate that people are more or less equally prone to the experience of either).

    Compound specific discussion.

    AMT is a compound that has been around for many years. It has been the focus of some actual clinical research.

    Looking at the data here, 66.7% of respondents considered the material ‘worthwhile.’

    The overall average pleasure score is +1.30 or about midway between ‘Pleasant / Mildly Elevated Mood’ and ‘Elated / Euphoric / Very Upbeat.’ This statistic does not really capture the flavor of the reports in this instance. They seem to be spread between notably positive and markedly negative, with no neutral scores reported.

    The respondents generally reported that this is a noticeably stimulating compound with a stimulation score of +1.96 or about equivalent to ‘Moderately Stimulating.’ This should not be surprising since AMT is effectively the tryptamine version of amphetamine.

    The most commonly reported side-effect for this compound was nausea / upset stomach, with 75% of those responding noting it. 29.2% reported vomiting. 8.3% of respondents checked the ‘No Appreciable Side Effects Whatsoever’ item.

    Like most all other compounds surveyed, the most frequently reported number of uses was 2-5 times (52%). Uses reported ranged between 1 and 50 times.

    There were the following freeform items:

    “Feels like your stimulated so hard you trip. “

    “I saw Aliens! They were Mayan insectoids with dreadlockish looking hair. One worked on a "Spacecraft, while the other showed me a "Pop-Up" video from the palm of its hand which depicted the destruction of a solar system (Clearly not our's). It was very strange, but absolutely 'Real'!!!!”

    “Nausea wasn't an issue with high doses(90mg+). The stimulant type body load is much lower than expected at even very high doses; 300mg produced less body load than a standard dose of MDMA or methamphetamine.”

    “Garbage.”

    “A psychedelic body-load. That's the best way to describe this drug. Not a pleasant bodyload either -- a sick and feverish one.”

    “Apon coming down, around the 12th hour or so some 5-MeO-DMT was smoked. What followed was contact with 3 entities, one for each state of matter. It was one of the most intense and frightening experiences, and totally real to me at the time. I don't know whether this would count or not because of the inclusion of another chemical, but thought that it was important because of the concrete nature of the entities I seen.”

    I B
     

    Attached Files:

    Last edited by a moderator: Sep 10, 2017
  2. allyourbase

    allyourbase Palladium Member

    Reputation Points:
    651
    Messages:
    1,601
    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2005
    from U.S.A.
    experiences:

    oral 250 mg: speedy, mild purple and pink visuals without movement

    smoked 100 mg: I felt like I was on speed apart from the visuals
     
Tags: