Alright, wasnt sure if this should be here or in funny shit... depending on the responses i guess. I have never done crack but from a outsider's view one can draw comparisons between the two. 1. both short acting stimulants, obviously one is far stronger. 2. Both highly addictive, one purely mental I has heard (crack) 3. Both make enormous amounts of money for the dealers, be it Philip morris or crack cook/dealer. 4. Both though not extremely expensive can easily deplete your funds in a matter of time, smoking packs a day, smoking rocks round the clock. Any ideas? I thought of this thread as a joke but realized that there are some legit similarities... and I am sure that if coke was legal, Philip morris and rj Reynolds would corner the market!